Ukraine urged to destroy Russia's bridge to Crimea

I’m not a fan of either men, both are no longer relevant, thank goodness.

You are not a fan of a man (Ron Paul) who was for peace?
A FAR, smaller US military?
And free speech?
And free trade?
And for America not getting involved in foreign conflicts that were none of our business?
And was strongly against US invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan?

nd he had the guts - on numerous occasions - to be the sole voter against his party on things he felt strongly about.
Right or wrong...the man has principles and he stood buy them...no matter the cost (politically).


I do not agree with everything he stands for.

But I certainly hope his desire for peace, a smaller military, fiscal responsibility and individual freedoms/liberties for ALL Americans.
Plus, having the guts to stand up for what he believes?

Is something DESPERATELY needed in America, right now.


And you say 'thank goodness' he is 'no longer relevant' to someone like that?
So noted.
 
Last edited:
You clearly, just made that up.

Show me a link to a respected site that says SPECIFICALLY that a 'neutron bomb is designed to produce ZERO/NO fallout'?

Not 'little' or 'some'.
'NO fallout'

I GUARANTEE that you cannot.



You clearly do not even know what neutron bombs are.

Neutron bombs are designed to produce GREATER levels of certain types of radiation.
They are called enhanced radiation weapon's (ERW).

They were designed to produce, intense radiation that would penetrate Warsaw Pact tanks (that had NBC protection) and kill their crews.
With 'REDUCED' fallout/destruction for use in West Germany battlefields.

The only nuclear weapon that could even, theoretically, produce almost no fallout is a pure, fusion bomb.
And that has not been invented yet.

You're just being an obnoxious prick now, sayanora!
 
You are not a fan of a man (Ron Paul) who was for peace?
A FAR, smaller US military?
And free speech?
And free trade?
And for America not getting involved in foreign conflicts that were none of our business?
And was strongly against US invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan?

nd he had the guts - on numerous occasions - to be the sole voter against his party on things he felt strongly about.
Right or wrong...the man has principles and he stood buy them...no matter the cost (politically).


I do not agree with everything he stands for.

But I certainly hope his desire for peace, a smaller military, fiscal responsibility and individual freedoms/liberties for ALL Americans.
Plus, having the guts to stand up for what he believes?

Is something DESPERATELY needed in America, right now.


And you say 'thank goodness' he is 'no longer relevant' to someone like that?
So noted.
Yes, though I agree with some of his positions, others aren’t based on smart foreign policy, like withdrawing from NATO. He also supported Pat Buchanan for President. That’s when he lost my respect.
 
Russia: US ‘encouragement’ of Ukraine complicates diplomatic solution
Russia is open for diplomacy, but Washington’s encouragement of Ukraine’s “bellicose mood” complicates diplomatic efforts to solve the conflict, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova has said.

“We repeat once again specially for the American side: the tasks that we set in Ukraine will be solved,” Zakharova wrote on the ministry website.

“Russia is open for diplomacy and the conditions are well known. The longer Washington encourages Kyiv’s bellicose mood and encourages rather than hinders the terrorist undertakings of Ukrainian saboteurs, the more difficult will be the search for diplomatic solutions.”


https://www.aljazeera.com/news/liveblog/2022/10/10/several-explosions-heard-in-ukraine-capital-kyiv

NATO is the encouragement. It is a self-fulfilling prophesy.
 
Maybe attacking their bridge was a major strategic clusterfuck ? Small wonder that nobody has put their hand up.

You and Putin are one trick ponies. You can't defeat the Ukrainian army so you end up attacking apartment buildings, schools, and civilian power plants.
 
Last edited:
You and Putin are one trick ponies. You can't defeat the Ukrainian army so you end up attacking apartment buildings, schools, and civilian power plants.

If you put down your bugle and took off your blindfold you'd appreciate the message behind the missile salvos . The fact that the death toll was very small- some eleven poor victims, I believe, following over eighty missiles fired at a dozen cities- should indicate to any clear-sighted observer- which you're not- that these strikes were merely a warning. The Russians targeted open areas, parks, road junctions , rural areas etc. The western press can holler and bawl about ' childrens' playgrounds, university grounds, hospital car-parks and so on but none of them mention the extremely low casualty figures from such a heavy bombardment. The fact that these- apparently high-precision- strikes took out a few dozen pigeons, some statues, the odd water fountain and some traffic lights goes unmentioned in your daily hogwash trough should alarm you.
You should bear in mind that a great many Ukrainians are pro-Russian. That, imo, is what has saved Zelensky and his Azov Nazi wannabes so far. Russia's problem is not how to kill NATO's Ukrainian Nazis, it's how to defend Ukraine's pro-Russians at the same time.
So- you were saying something about ' one-trick ' ?
 
Neither NATO nor Ukraine attacked Russia, and Ukraine is legally and morally justified in defending it's sovereign territory from invaders.

I doubt you will listen to me but be wary of the lessons of history. If Russia is totally humiliated and reduced to penury like Germany in the interregnum between the world wars, then maybe another Stalin will emerge.
 
Moon Moon Moon did I hit a nerve? Would you like to take a poll to decide if more people here agree with me about Russia or you.:laugh:

Let's hear you bleat, Lame . You are suggesting polling the herd about the popularity of the sheep-dog.

Baaaaaa .



Haw, haw, haw, haw, haw..................................haw, haw................................haw.
 
If you put down your bugle and took off your blindfold you'd appreciate the message behind the missile salvos . The fact that the death toll was very small- some eleven poor victims, I believe, following over eighty missiles fired at a dozen cities- should indicate to any clear-sighted observer- which you're not- that these strikes were merely a warning. The Russians targeted open areas, parks, road junctions , rural areas etc. The western press can holler and bawl about ' childrens' playgrounds, university grounds, hospital car-parks and so on but none of them mention the extremely low casualty figures from such a heavy bombardment. The fact that these- apparently high-precision- strikes took out a few dozen pigeons, some statues, the odd water fountain and some traffic lights goes unmentioned in your daily hogwash trough should alarm you.
You should bear in mind that a great many Ukrainians are pro-Russian. That, imo, is what has saved Zelensky and his Azov Nazi wannabes so far. Russia's problem is not how to kill NATO's Ukrainian Nazis, it's how to defend Ukraine's pro-Russians at the same time.
So- you were saying something about ' one-trick ' ?
The Ukrainians shot down 42 missiles. Putin's response was against civilians and infrastructure because he can't do significant damage to Ukraine's military. Putin is trying to intimidate the Ukrainians but it didn't work. Their army is going to chase the Russians off their soil. Putin's miscalculation may well result in his ouster from power. The view of Russia as the World's 2nd most powerful army has already been destroyed. The Russian army is running for it's life .

Haw....haw...haw
 
Let's hear you bleat, Lame . You are suggesting polling the herd about the popularity of the sheep-dog.

Baaaaaa .



Haw, haw, haw, haw, haw..................................haw, haw................................haw.
The sheep dog has no teeth. Haw, haw, haw, haw, haw..................................haw, haw................................haw
 
I support international law.

Russia's recent wave of attacks on Ukraine may have violated the laws of war and would amount to war crimes if civilians were deliberately targeted, the United Nations said Tuesday.

"These strikes may have violated the principles of the conduct of hostilities under international humanitarian law," Ravina Shamdasani, a spokeswoman for the UN human rights office, told reporters in Geneva, adding that intentionally targeting civilians and civilian objects, "amounts to a war crime."

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022...ues-strikes-on-civilian-infrastructure-a79049
 
Russia's recent wave of attacks on Ukraine may have violated the laws of war and would amount to war crimes if civilians were deliberately targeted, the United Nations said Tuesday.

"These strikes may have violated the principles of the conduct of hostilities under international humanitarian law," Ravina Shamdasani, a spokeswoman for the UN human rights office, told reporters in Geneva, adding that intentionally targeting civilians and civilian objects, "amounts to a war crime."

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022...ues-strikes-on-civilian-infrastructure-a79049
Putin believes that he will never be captured and forced to answer for his crimes.
 
Russia's recent wave of attacks on Ukraine may have violated the laws of war and would amount to war crimes if civilians were deliberately targeted, the United Nations said Tuesday.

"These strikes may have violated the principles of the conduct of hostilities under international humanitarian law," Ravina Shamdasani, a spokeswoman for the UN human rights office, told reporters in Geneva, adding that intentionally targeting civilians and civilian objects, "amounts to a war crime."

https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2022...ues-strikes-on-civilian-infrastructure-a79049

The Azov Nazis will have eight years of shelling pro-Russian civilians to answer for.
 
I do not agree with everything he stands for.

But I certainly hope his desire for peace, a smaller military, fiscal responsibility and individual freedoms/liberties for ALL Americans.
Plus, having the guts to stand up for what he believes?

Is something DESPERATELY needed in America, right now.


And you say 'thank goodness' he is 'no longer relevant' to someone like that?
So noted.
With all other manufacturing offshored, there is big money in weapons manufacturing.

Our policy is built upon the blood of the lower/middle class sodiers, and the investments of the 1%.

That will never change.
 
Back
Top