Obama artificial economics exposed by job losses?

Southern Man said:
Liberal policies started this whole slide, now your side has complete unfettered control, and it's gotten worse with no end in sight. So you blame the GOP. LOL
Click to expand...

:rolleyes: Would someone take laughing boy here by the hand to the local library so he could do some research on reaganomics? Thank you.

In the meantime, read this to him and then explain it....slowly!

[ame="http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=531239&postcount=19"]Just Plain Politics! - View Single Post - Obama artificial economics exposed by job losses?[/ame]
 
Southern Man said:
So reductions in taxes and regulations caused a depression 30 years later? Wow you're so full of shit your eyes must be brown.
Click to expand...

Reagan was in office for 2 terms
His VP, Daddy Bush, was in office for 1 term
Clinton straddled the fence for 2 terms
The Shrub put reaganomics on steriods for 2 terms

That's twenty years of straight up reaganomics, you blithering idiot! With 8 years of fence straddling by Slick Willy.

FACTS.....something you should become familiar with. Now please find an adult you trust to explain it all to you....again. :rolleyes: See ya!;)
 
Taichiliberal said:
Reagan was in office for 2 terms
His VP, Daddy Bush, was in office for 1 term
Clinton straddled the fence for 2 terms
The Shrub put reaganomics on steriods for 2 terms

That's twenty years of straight up reaganomics, you blithering idiot! With 8 years of fence straddling by Slick Willy.

FACTS.....something you should become familiar with. Now please find an adult you trust to explain it all to you....again. :rolleyes: See ya!;)
Click to expand...
Dady Bush and Clinton both raised taxes, you brown-eyed blithering idiot. *shrug*

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/wm1835.cfm
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Reagan was in office for 2 terms
His VP, Daddy Bush, was in office for 1 term
Clinton straddled the fence for 2 terms
The Shrub put reaganomics on steriods for 2 terms

That's twenty years of straight up reaganomics, you blithering idiot! With 8 years of fence straddling by Slick Willy.

FACTS.....something you should become familiar with. Now please find an adult you trust to explain it all to you....again. See ya!
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
Dady Bush and Clinton both raised taxes, you brown-eyed blithering idiot. *shrug*

http://www.heritage.org/Research/Taxes/wm1835.cfm
Click to expand...

No shit sherlock! Why the hell did you think I called Slick Willy a fence straddler? Must I explain everything to you (biased sources like the heritage foundation nonwithstanding)? Hell, even Michael Moore called the Slickster the best thing that happened to the GOP.

But let's focus here....YOU made some assinine statement that liberals were to blame for our current problems via 30 years of gov't control. As I demonstrated using just general information, that is NOT the case. But you don't even have the courage to admit your error there. You pathetic Southie. Grow up.
 
There are some things you just can't deny......like videos...



[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cMnSp4qEXNM&feature=related"]YouTube - Timeline shows Bush, McCain warning Dems of financial and housing crisis; meltdown[/ame]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ivmL-lXNy64&feature=related"]YouTube - EVIDENCE FOUND!!! Clinton administration's "BANK AFFIRMATIVE ACTION" They forced banks to make BAD LOANS and ACORN and Obama's tie to all of it!!![/ame]
 
Taichiliberal said:
No shit sherlock! Why the hell did you think I called Slick Willy a fence straddler? Must I explain everything to you (biased sources like the heritage foundation nonwithstanding)? Hell, even Michael Moore called the Slickster the best thing that happened to the GOP.

But let's focus here....YOU made some assinine statement that liberals were to blame for our current problems via 30 years of gov't control. As I demonstrated using just general information, that is NOT the case. But you don't even have the courage to admit your error there. You pathetic Southie. Grow up.
Click to expand...
Raising taxes ain't exactly fence straddling, you pathetic Brown Eyes.
 
tinfoil said:
The same amount less my share of the bailout(+interest)

Do you think taxpayers didn't pay for it?
How much would my taxes be if the bailouts worked?

Face it dumbass, you have no clue why you evenb supported it because you're an economic simpleton.
Click to expand...

That's projection; I love it when you try to talk about economics.

Seriously - what do you think happens to job holders when the economy loses 2-3 trillion dollars in about 3 months? What do you think happens to big businesses, and small businesses, and everyone who relies on any kind of commerce for their paycheck (which is, btw, pretty much everyone)?

LOL
 
bravo said:
There are some things you just can't deny......like videos...



YouTube - Timeline shows Bush, McCain warning Dems of financial and housing crisis; meltdown

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
YouTube - EVIDENCE FOUND!!! Clinton administration's "BANK AFFIRMATIVE ACTION" They forced banks to make BAD LOANS and ACORN and Obama's tie to all of it!!!
Click to expand...

This guy pretty much had to deal with a similar intellectually impotent neocon parrot like you on this subject.

http://www.alternet.org/workplace/1...laming_wall_street_for_the_financial_crisis_/
 
Southern Man said:
Raising taxes ain't exactly fence straddling, you pathetic Brown Eyes.
Click to expand...

Evidently I do have to explain the facts of life to you. I forget you're not really that familiar with recent history.

Daddy Bush followed the tax philosophy of giving breaks to the wealthy, while Clinton's NAFTA did no favors for the working man, his tax raises were NOT exactly in the same vein of reaganonmics. Here's a sample of the discussion at the time
http://www.pkarchive.org/economy/ClintonTaxPlan.html

Okay, so let's review: YOU claimed the liberals and Dems actions over 30 years were responsible for our current economic problems. I pointed out that 20 of those years were under your gods Reagan and the Bush family. So right off the bat, YOU'RE wrong. So stop acting like a stubborn child and just acknowledge the logical conclusion.....YOU'RE WRONG.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Evidently I do have to explain the facts of life to you. I forget you're not really that familiar with recent history.

Daddy Bush followed the tax philosophy of giving breaks to the wealthy, while Clinton's NAFTA did no favors for the working man, his tax raises were NOT exactly in the same vein of reaganonmics. Here's a sample of the discussion at the time
http://www.pkarchive.org/economy/ClintonTaxPlan.html

Okay, so let's review: YOU claimed the liberals and Dems actions over 30 years were responsible for our current economic problems. I pointed out that 20 of those years were under your gods Reagan and the Bush family. So right off the bat, YOU'RE wrong. So stop acting like a stubborn child and just acknowledge the logical conclusion.....YOU'RE WRONG.
Click to expand...
The current economic problems stem from Carter era policies of forcing banks to lend to folks with bad credit in order to lend money to their minority constituents, buying votes with taxpayer money. Constant screw-ups from Democrat policy makers, culminating with Bwarney Frank (The Banking Queen) Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac caused the "Great Recession". So stop acting like a stubborn child and just acknowledge the logical conclusion.....YOU'RE WRONG.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Evidently I do have to explain the facts of life to you. I forget you're not really that familiar with recent history.

Daddy Bush followed the tax philosophy of giving breaks to the wealthy, while Clinton's NAFTA did no favors for the working man, his tax raises were NOT exactly in the same vein of reaganonmics. Here's a sample of the discussion at the time
http://www.pkarchive.org/economy/ClintonTaxPlan.html
Click to expand...

Okay, so let's review: YOU claimed the liberals and Dems actions over 30 years were responsible for our current economic problems. I pointed out that 20 of those years were under your gods Reagan and the Bush family. So right off the bat, YOU'RE wrong. So stop acting like a stubborn child and just acknowledge the logical conclusion.....YOU'RE WRONG.

Southern Man said:
The current economic problems stem from Carter era policies of forcing banks to lend to folks with bad credit in order to lend money to their minority constituents, buying votes with taxpayer money. Constant screw-ups from Democrat policy makers, culminating with Bwarney Frank (The Banking Queen) Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac caused the "Great Recession". So stop acting like a stubborn child and just acknowledge the logical conclusion.....YOU'RE WRONG.
Click to expand...

For your education: Carter INHERITED an economy headed for the toilet from NIXON (with finishing touches by Gerald "Drop dead, New York" Ford)...Nixon's economic "5 year plan" was touted by leading economist at the time as a screw-up that would have implications on our nation's economy for an estimated 30 years. I note that all you've done is just regurgitate the same LIE that neocons hold on for dear life....yet to date you cannot produce one piece of legislation that states that banks HAD TO take on bad loan risks. You imply such, but you have no paper trail to prove it. Like I said before, thanks to deregulation under Reagan, the banks were FREE to essentially commit fraud.....handing out loans willy-nilly as a nose thumbing reply to legislation that made them give the same loan status to minorities as they did to non-minorities. Then the banks mixed their bad loans with their good loans portfolios, then bought/sold them between each other. This went on LONG before Barney Frank came onto the seen, so to solely blame him and the Dems is just plain incorrect.

Bottom line: you made a statement that liberal Dems for the past 30 years were solely responsible for our current economic woes. All I did was just remind you there were Republican Presidents for 20 of those years. Remember, the Dems may have had a House edge for years, but the GOP held it's own in the crucial Senate. (i.e., little things like Gingrich's walkout that STOPPED gov't for a bit).

Bottom line: it is a matter of fact and history that your statement was WRONG....and your stubborn refusal just to acknowledge this has reached the point of insipidness.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Okay, so let's review: YOU claimed the liberals and Dems actions over 30 years were responsible for our current economic problems. I pointed out that 20 of those years were under your gods Reagan and the Bush family. So right off the bat, YOU'RE wrong. So stop acting like a stubborn child and just acknowledge the logical conclusion.....YOU'RE WRONG.



For your education: Carter INHERITED an economy headed for the toilet from NIXON (with finishing touches by Gerald "Drop dead, New York" Ford)...Nixon's economic "5 year plan" was touted by leading economist at the time as a screw-up that would have implications on our nation's economy for an estimated 30 years. I note that all you've done is just regurgitate the same LIE that neocons hold on for dear life....yet to date you cannot produce one piece of legislation that states that banks HAD TO take on bad loan risks. You imply such, but you have no paper trail to prove it. Like I said before, thanks to deregulation under Reagan, the banks were FREE to essentially commit fraud.....handing out loans willy-nilly as a nose thumbing reply to legislation that made them give the same loan status to minorities as they did to non-minorities. Then the banks mixed their bad loans with their good loans portfolios, then bought/sold them between each other. This went on LONG before Barney Frank came onto the seen, so to solely blame him and the Dems is just plain incorrect.

Bottom line: you made a statement that liberal Dems for the past 30 years were solely responsible for our current economic woes. All I did was just remind you there were Republican Presidents for 20 of those years. Remember, the Dems may have had a House edge for years, but the GOP held it's own in the crucial Senate. (i.e., little things like Gingrich's walkout that STOPPED gov't for a bit).

Bottom line: it is a matter of fact and history that your statement was WRONG....and your stubborn refusal just to acknowledge this has reached the point of insipidness.
Click to expand...

Who controlled the House during those 30 years?
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Okay, so let's review: YOU claimed the liberals and Dems actions over 30 years were responsible for our current economic problems. I pointed out that 20 of those years were under your gods Reagan and the Bush family. So right off the bat, YOU'RE wrong. So stop acting like a stubborn child and just acknowledge the logical conclusion.....YOU'RE WRONG.



For your education: Carter INHERITED an economy headed for the toilet from NIXON (with finishing touches by Gerald "Drop dead, New York" Ford)...Nixon's economic "5 year plan" was touted by leading economist at the time as a screw-up that would have implications on our nation's economy for an estimated 30 years. I note that all you've done is just regurgitate the same LIE that neocons hold on for dear life....yet to date you cannot produce one piece of legislation that states that banks HAD TO take on bad loan risks. You imply such, but you have no paper trail to prove it. Like I said before, thanks to deregulation under Reagan, the banks were FREE to essentially commit fraud.....handing out loans willy-nilly as a nose thumbing reply to legislation that made them give the same loan status to minorities as they did to non-minorities. Then the banks mixed their bad loans with their good loans portfolios, then bought/sold them between each other. This went on LONG before Barney Frank came onto the seen, so to solely blame him and the Dems is just plain incorrect.

Bottom line: you made a statement that liberal Dems for the past 30 years were solely responsible for our current economic woes. All I did was just remind you there were Republican Presidents for 20 of those years. Remember, the Dems may have had a House edge for years, but the GOP held it's own in the crucial Senate. (i.e., little things like Gingrich's walkout that STOPPED gov't for a bit).

Bottom line: it is a matter of fact and history that your statement was WRONG....and your stubborn refusal just to acknowledge this has reached the point of insipidness.
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
Who controlled the House during those 30 years?
Click to expand...

Who controlled the Senate? Again, you remember Gingrich's infamous walk out before they canned his hypocritical butt? Contrary to popular belief the Dems DID NOT have the total control of both Houses prior to the neocon takeover under the Shrub. Couple this with what I pointed out before, and your stubborn premise just won't stand against ALL the facts of history. But you just keep repeating the SOS and ingoring what doesn't fit your belief pattern...as useless as that ploy of yours is.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Who controlled the Senate? Again, you remember Gingrich's infamous walk out before they canned his hypocritical butt? Contrary to popular belief the Dems DID NOT have the total control of both Houses prior to the neocon takeover under the Shrub. Couple this with what I pointed out before, and your stubborn premise just won't stand against ALL the facts of history. But you just keep repeating the SOS and ingoring what doesn't fit your belief pattern...as useless as that ploy of yours is.
Click to expand...
I asked you who controlled the Senate, not who the Speaker of the House was.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top