Bills would curtail objections at future Jan. 6 vote counts

PostmodernProphet said:
each objection should be considered and voted on.......if a majority do not accept the objection the matter moves on.......not sure why lib'ruls feel that is dangerous......
Click to expand...

Because none of it has been done in good faith.

It's all been about lies; lies you've been telling here on JPP.

So I hope you really understand what you're arguing for here, because Harris is going to be the VP overseeing this certification in January 2025, so if she wants to throw out a GOP/Trump win, you're giving her the power to do that.

If you object or oppose this bill, you are all but guaranteeing that Harris will refuse to certify any GOP win.
 
LV426 said:
We had one in November 2020, which at the time you said was fraudulent, and then continued to say that for two months after the election, but were conspicuously on JPP all day 1/6 when you could have been fighting the fraud in DC.

So how come you did that?
Click to expand...

I said it was unconstitutional......so did the WI Supreme Court......why didn't you object to the unconstitutional election like people who were concerned about the constitution did?......
 
LV426 said:
Because none of it has been done in good faith.
Click to expand...

hopefully you realize that it is wrong to prohibit any examination of the process because YOU believe some previous action was not done in good faith.......anything done in bad faith can be rejected by a majority of the House or the Senate......pass this bill and you will never again be allowed to raise your GOOD FAITH objections........
 
PostmodernProphet said:
.so did the WI Supreme Court
Click to expand...

LIAR.

The 4 Conservatives on the WI SCOTUS said drop boxes were unconstitutional IN 2022.

They did not rule that prior to the 2020 election, nor did they say the 2020 election was unconstitutional.

So you don't seem to know what the fuck you're talking about.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
hopefully you realize that it is wrong to prohibit any examination of the process because YOU believe some previous action was not done in good faith..
Click to expand...

There was no fraud in the 2020 election, the WI SCOTUS made their ruling 2 years after the 2020 election, and you have been spreading the lies that there was fraud but you don't stand behind what you say here.

You're a phony.

And even throwing WI's votes out, TRUMP STILL LOSES THE ELECTORAL COLLEGE.

So this isn't about correcting a wrong, this is about you trying to rig the game because you can't win a majority of votes and haven't been able to in 20 years.
 
PostmodernProphet said:
anything done in bad faith can be rejected by a majority of the House or the Senate..
Click to expand...

Actually, it's not on either of those, and it's on the VP.

And who is the current VP?

So do you really, really think Harris is going to certify a questionable election for Trump?
 
PostmodernProphet said:
pass this bill and you will never again be allowed to raise your GOOD FAITH objections........
Click to expand...

Sure I can! At the state level.

That's where the objections need to be because State Legislatures certify those results.

By saying Congress should object, you're also saying that you don't think states should certify the results.

So once again, your position is completely contradictory and shortsighted.

Why would you object to election results that a state legislature has already certified? Because you're trying to pull off a coup.
 
LV426 said:
LIAR.

The 4 Conservatives on the WI SCOTUS said drop boxes were unconstitutional IN 2022.

They did not rule that prior to the 2020 election, nor did they say the 2020 election was unconstitutional.

So you don't seem to know what the fuck you're talking about.
Click to expand...

lol.....if they were unconstitutional in 2022 how would they have not been unconstitutional in 2020?.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
why do you keep asking the same stupid question?.....
Click to expand...

Because you won't answer it.

The reason you won't answer it is because there's no answer to that question that makes you look good coming out the other side. All answers to that question will impeach your character and your sincerity, and you can't win either. So you are either:

- Too much of a coward to show up on 1/6.

OR

- Knew that you were spreading lies and didn't want to end up in jail over them.

Because other than the people in jail or facing trial for 1/6 now, no one else truly believes that the 2020 election was stolen or unconstitutional, not even you.
 
LV426 said:
"Possibly"????

Oh ffs, give me a fucking break with this shit already.

The election was secure and the only reason anyone thinks it wasn't is because of Donald Trump's big, fat, fucking LOSER mouth.
Click to expand...

And Fox TV lies
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top