Are you pretending it made it to discovery? 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss - GRANTED!
But hey, it was a good trick to get idiot Trumppers to send him more money!
Trump files Federal Lawsuit against Hillary, & Other Dems, OVER RUSSIA LIE.
- Thread starter Grokmaster
- Start date
Are you pretending it made it to discovery? 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss - GRANTED!
But hey, it was a good trick to get idiot Trumppers to send him more money!
Monad Portal
Was it me?
Poor ASS HAT! Your Golden Calf has been proven not to be a God, once again.
OF COURSE A CLINTON-APPOINTED JUDGE WAS SOUGHT OUT AND PAID APPROPRIATELY.
It looks like my prediction came true.
I predict half of the defendants will be gone in 6 months from the suit and the suit will be dropped by Trump or he will lose in court within 16 months. How much you willing to bet or are you going to continue to mouth off without being willing to actually put up anything other than your idiotic opinions?
And your predictions failed miserable.
Does time work differently for Trumpers? There is a 4 year statute of limitations on RICO cases. The suit by Trump alleges the crimes occurred in 2016, which means the case needed to be filed before the end of 2020. It wasn't.
The RICO statute requires that at least 2 crimes occur that meet the requirements. The judge points out that Trump couldn't even point to one crime under RICO.
This is not the case of a judge being bought off. This is the case of a judge applying the actual law and seeing that Trump has not brought any evidence at all that meets the legal requirements.
The ruling is here....
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/63184300/267/trump-v-clinton/
Feel free to point out where the judge actually made an error.
HORSE SHIT. IT'S A CASE OF A JUDGE APPOINTED BY HER HUSBAND, AND A GLARING CONFLICT OF INTEREST....
ROFLMAO.. So are you willing to argue that Judge Aileen Cannon has a glaring conflict of interest? Are you willing to argue that every judge Trump appointed has a glaring conflict of interest?
My guess is you are full of that horse shit since you weren't able to point out a single part of the ruling where you think the judge made an error.
Appointed by Regan.
What president was she married to?
IRRELEVANT TO THE FACT THAT IT WAS DISMISSED BY A JUDGE SEATED BY HER HUSBAND... A GLARING CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
HILLARY'S HUSBAND YOU CHILDISH MORON.
So, it is a glaring conflict of interest for Aileen Cannon to rule on anything related to Trump?
You still haven't pointed to where Judge Middlebrooks made an error. Is there a 4 year statute of limitations or not? Is this 2022 and the alleged RICO act occured in 2016? Is it 6 years from 2016 to 2022? Is 6 years greater than 4 years?
Team Crazy picked the Special Master, dumbass.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/09/23/trumps-special-master-pick-turns-into-headache/
Trump’s special master pick turns into a headache
A push by Donald Trump’s lawyers to appoint a special master in the Mar-a-Lago documents case has quickly lost its main utility, with an appeals court restoring the Justice Department’s access to the documents with classified markings.
Halting the Justice Department’s review of those documents — and by extension slowing its criminal probe of Trump — appeared to be its essential aim. In the end, it bought about two weeks’ worth of delay.
But special master Raymond J. Dearie is still here, as he presses forward with a less-consequential review of all of the other documents. And now Trump’s lawyers are contending with a series of very public and potentially embarrassing exchanges prompted by the special master they themselves recommended for the post.
First, Dearie did something that Trump-nominated U.S. District Judge Aileen M. Cannon, for some reason, hadn’t: actually pressing Trump’s legal team on its suggestions that Trump might have declassified the documents. That’s now irrelevant to Dearie’s review, with those documents no longer under his purview. But their failure to provide any real evidence that declassification took place (or to echo Trump’s public assurances that he had declassified all of the documents) was rebuked first by Dearie and then, shortly thereafter, by the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit.
The special master has clearly said that much of her ruling makes no sense with the law. For instance when the special master said until the Trump team says he declassified the documents he will view them as classified. Then he said he would prefer to not view them since the point of classification is to prevent people from seeing them unless they need to know. The special master has followed the law in that you don't believe the side that presents no evidence. He knows a proper ruling would have never appointed him in the first place but since he was appointed he will do his job under the law.
You still haven't pointed to where Judge Middlebrooks made an error. Is there a 4 year statute of limitations or not? Is this 2022 and the alleged RICO act occured in 2016? Is it 6 years from 2016 to 2022? Is 6 years greater than 4 years? Middlebrooks, like Dearie followed the law.
Well, well, well; there is no way Mr.Trump can possibly lose this lawsuit ,as there are thousands of hours of video, thousands of documents, and an ONGOING FEDERAL SPECIAL COUNSEL PROBE PROVING IT AS WELL.
IMAGINE ALL THAT WILL BE EXPOSED IN DISCOVERY!!
CANNOT WAIT TO SEE WHERE THIS GOES.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Donald Trump on Thursday sued Hillary Clinton and several other Democrats, alleging they tried to rig the 2016 U.S. presidential election by tying his campaign to Russia.
"Acting in concert, the Defendants maliciously conspired to weave a false narrative that their Republican opponent, Donald J. Trump, was colluding with a hostile foreign sovereignty," the former president alleged in a lawsuit filed in federal court in Florida.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...-allegations/ar-AAVsC6i?ocid=msedgdhp&pc=U531
/cdn.vox-cdn.com/uploads/chorus_asset/file/13586038/2.jpg)
IT'S ON!!!!
(AND HERE COME THE DESPERATE JPP LEFT AD HOMS AND/OR DESPERATE ATTEMPTS TO CHANGE THE TOPIC.....
Already dismissed!!!
So far there has not been enough evidence to convict trump beyond a reasonable doubt, but there has been enough evidence to convict others beyond a reasonable doubt. That makes trump winning basically impossible.
The lawsuit Trump filed against Hillary was dismissed, and the attorneys fine for having filed a frivolous lawsuit!
I love it!