Arizona judge rules state can enforce near-total abortion ban

Earl

Well-known member
Arizona judge rules state can enforce near-total abortion ban
CNN Digital Rebranding 2014 Maeve Reston

By Maeve Reston, CNN

Updated 9:05 PM ET, Fri September 23, 2022

(CNN)An Arizona Superior Court judge ruled Friday that a 1901 ban on nearly all abortions in that state can be enforced, a decision that is likely to see an appeal and is all but certain to galvanize female voters to turn out in greater numbers in the state's closely contested US Senate and governor's races.
In ruling that Arizona's near-total ban on abortion could take effect, Pima County Superior Court Judge Kellie Johnson granted a request by the state's Republican attorney general to lift a court injunction that had barred enforcement of Arizona's pre-statehood ban on abortion after the Supreme Court ruled in Roe v. Wade in 1973.
"The court finds that because the legal basis for the judgment entered in 1973 has now been overruled, it must vacate the judgment in its entirety," Johnson wrote in the ruling released Friday.

The case has thrust the issue of how restrictive abortion law should be in Arizona, a swing state that President Joe Biden carried by fewer than 11,000 votes. It's a controversial topic that has divided Republicans in Arizona and is reflective of a pitched debate nationwide in the wake of the US Supreme Court overturning Roe v. Wade in late June, with many GOP-led states passing increasingly restrictive measures that run the risk of alienating moderate voters.

The judge's ruling effectively outlaws all abortions in Arizona except when the procedure is necessary to save the mother's life. The decision came a day before a 15-week ban on abortion was slated to go into effect in Arizona. That law was passed by Arizona lawmakers before the US Supreme Court decision.

Abortion is banned or severely limited in a number of states. Here's where things stand
Conservative Arizona lawmakers included language in the bill banning abortion after 15 weeks stating that the new legislation would not override the 1901 law -- which was passed before Arizona became a state and can be traced back to as early as 1864. In addition to barring abortion in all cases except when "it is necessary to save (the mother's) life," the pre-statehood law carries a prison sentence of two to five years for abortion providers.
https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/23/politics/arizona-abortion-ban-ruling/index.html
 
The murder of unborn babies is decreasing across America.

The Grand Architect of the Universe is watching.
 
AZ is a political disaster and implementing a law from the 1800's only reinforces what a disaster the state is.
 
The date of a law does not negate the law.

We are a nation of laws, not a nation of men.

There are many archaic sexual "sin" laws that are not enforced, but that wasn't the point I was trying to make.

It's the fact that nobody in the Arizona government ever said "Hey guys. Maybe we should look into the possible implications of Roe versus Wade being overturned."

It's because nobody had that common sense that Arizona is now having to enforce 19th century laws.
 
Perhaps some small amount of Divine Providence will once again rain down on America now that the murder of the unborn has slowed...perhaps.
 
There are many archaic sexual "sin" laws that are not enforced, but that wasn't the point I was trying to make.

It's the fact that nobody in the Arizona government ever said "Hey guys. Maybe we should look into the possible implications of Roe versus Wade being overturned."

It's because nobody had that common sense that Arizona is now having to enforce 19th century laws.

The implication of the overturning of Roe vs. Wade is fewer unborn babies will be murdered by abortion...a good thing in the eyes of the Grand Architect.

There was never an enumerated right in the Constitution for abortion.

It is now left to the legislatures of each state who are elected by the voters of the states.

What could be more Democratic?
 
A different article says that there is a more recent 15 week abortion ban law on the books but, for some reason, this judge ruled that this law from 1864 should be enforced. I suspect there are more details that need to be understood.
 
Back
Top