MAGA MAN
Let's go Brandon!
Libertarians don't give a shit about freedom as long as the tyranny is privatized.
![]()
In a small way this is true. I don't care if your chosen state is tyrannical as long as I don't live there.
Libertarians don't give a shit about freedom as long as the tyranny is privatized.
![]()
Must be great to make up your own definitions of words.
I am experiencing a burning sensation. And a discharge.
To a land controlled by a King. They started the fight against the King. They won.
They ran away from the country of their birth.
https://www.forbes.com/sites/nicksi...egitimate-south-carolina-supreme-court-rules/
@dutchuncle
so the question is, if your state government ignores it's constitutional limits, approved by the state supreme court, do you abide or overthrow?
In a major blow against government accountability, the South Carolina Supreme Court last week upheld the state’s civil forfeiture laws, which let police permanently confiscate cash, cars, and even homes, without ever filing criminal charges. By overturning a lower court ruling that declared civil forfeiture unconstitutional, the decision jeopardizes property rights for thousands of people across the Palmetto State.
A sweeping investigation by the Greenville News and Anderson Independent Mail identified at least 1,510 cases—nearly 40% of all forfeiture cases in the state—where the owner was never convicted of a crime. And under state law, if an owner doesn’t formally file a claim for their seized property, law enforcement agencies win a “default judgment” and keep what was taken. In South Carolina, over 70% of forfeiture cases were won by default.
Worse, state law provides a powerfully perverse incentive to police for profit. Once a property has been forfeited, the seizing agency keeps the first $1,000 and then 75% of the remainder. Prosecutors receive 20%, while a mere 5% is sent to the general fund. Since 2009, law enforcement has generated nearly $97 million in state forfeiture revenue.
“This ruling is both shocking and extraordinarily disappointing,” said Robert Frommer, a senior attorney at the Institute for Justice, which is litigating the case. “South Carolina’s forfeiture laws violate citizens’ property and constitutional rights, yet the court ruled that it’s up to the legislature—the very entity that enacted those laws—to protect those rights.”
The case dates back to 2017, when Travis Green was arrested on multiple charges around Myrtle Beach. In addition to confiscating narcotics, the 15th Circuit Drug Enforcement Unit seized $20,771 in cash from Green’s wallet and an outdoor garage closet. Although Green pled guilty, he challenged the government’s attempt to forfeit his property.
If you don't like that State, move to another one. That's the beauty of the Federalist system.
Dude I grew up in Massachusetts, where everything is illegal unless the Dear State.gov declares it permissible. I left there "as soon as I could", and could care less about leaving.
Best to educate folks on limited Federal government and let the states do as they will.
Must be great to make up your own definitions of words.
That poster has a very high regard for itself and as a result actually believes everyone else does too. That poster even told me once how brilliant it's posts here are. I mean what better endorsement could be gotten then that.
Dang! I expected a number of other States to "join hands" with the Oligarchy before South Carolina... wow...So South Carolina has decided to join The Oligarchy and discard it's own constitution and the Constitution of the United States. *sigh* Only 47 left now. We are going to have to start removing stars from the flag.
In a small way this is true. I don't care if your chosen state is tyrannical as long as I don't live there.![]()

Dang! I expected a number of other States to "join hands" with the Oligarchy before South Carolina... wow...
It's in a big way.
can a corporation ever be tyrannical?
does state capture ever occur?
are the benefits of free markets ever lessened in the case of monopolies and cartels?
because libertarians cannot address any of this in their shangri-la mentality, they can be discounted and ignored.
Redefinition fallacies (corporation<->evil, corporation<->government).
Monopolies are not possible in capitalism. They can only exist with government help. Same with cartels.....
libertarians cannot acknowledge fascism.
![]()
Where would someone like you learn WTF gerund means, Fredo?You lying is the typical thing.
technically it's a gerund. a nounalization of an -ing verb.
example sentence: "living alone is an achievement she was very proud of, considering her retardation."