gfm7175's "battle for senate" and "battle for house" projections

[gfm7175]

You seriously not going to provide any evidence of the massive fraud you claimed occurred?

It's already been presented to you. You can't ignore it away.

Oh.. that's right. .you can't provide any such evidence so you will make idiotic claims about how you already presented it even though it doesn't exist.

You can't pretend that it doesn't exist, dude. It's already been presented to you. Your evidence denialism does not make it magically disappear.

 

[Into the Night]

You seriously not going to provide any evidence of the massive fraud you claimed occurred? Oh.. that's right. .you can't provide any such evidence so you will make idiotic claims about how you already presented it even though it doesn't exist.

Already done. Argument of the Stone fallacy. RQAA.

 

[Into the Night]

The funny thing is, you haven't presented any real evidence. Your made up bullshit is not evidence and every court that has looked at it has said it isn't real.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. Evidence has been presented to you. True Scotsman fallacy. Public record is not made up. Laws passed unconstitutionally are not made up. Courts are not required for evidence to exist. No court has authority to choose the electors for any State.

 

[Into the Night]

So, I wonder why you have kept this evidence from the courts. Oh.. that's right.. it isn't really evidence. The dog ate your homework. But you did do it. Honest. You wouldn't lie about that.

Argument of the Stone fallacy. RQAA. True Scotsman fallacy. Cliche fallacy.

 

[Truth Detector]

... ASSUMING A VALID ELECTION TAKES PLACE...


SENATE:
Colorado -- D's will win.
Washington -- D's will probably win, although R's do have a legit shot here.
Arizona -- R's might squeak it out (due to Lake)... it'll be close.
Georgia -- R's will probably win a close one.
New Hampshire -- idk who will win.
North Carolina -- R's will win. R's "losing" would be a huge red flag for fraud.
Nevada -- R's will win (and Hispanics will play a part in that).
Pennsylvania -- idk who will win. R's seem to have momentum to eek it out.
Wisconsin -- R's will win. R's "losing" would be a huge red flag for fraud.
Ohio -- R's will win and win big.
Florida -- R's will win.

I'm thinking either a 52-48 or a 53-47 win for R's... R's will take it, no doubt, it's just a matter of how much they'll take it by.


HOUSE:
I won't go through individual races here (there are too many), but R's will take it, no doubt, it's just a matter of how much they'll take it by. I'm thinking that they could gain as little as 20 seats and as many as 35 seats.


GOVERNOR:
I won't go through all individual races here, but I'll just note that R's will hold the majority of Governorships and that several D's will be flipping over to R's.

Georgia -- R's will hold.
Nevada -- R's will flip it (again, look for Hispanics to make a difference)
Pennsylvania -- idk who will win. R's seem to have momentum, but D's might hold it.
Wisconsin -- R's should win it, but not guaranteed.
Arizona -- R's will win. If R's "lose", that's a major red flag for fraud.

Florida and Texas will both easily remain R.

Good predictions. Here's mine based on what occurred during Obamunism:

 

[Truth Detector]

You're clearly insane, Sybil.

Projection.

 

[Truth Detector]

Hard to imagine anyone voting for the fascist GOP.

You voted for Biden. You owe ALL Americans an apology.

 

[Truth Detector]

Bingo, projections coming from those that swallow the Big Lie are worthless, if they are wrong, they’ll say it is only cause the elections were rigged, some probably still don’t believe Cruz won Iowa back in 2015

Let's see yours shit-for-brains. I hope you have stocked up on your meds for November. There are going to be a lot of your fellow leftists needing some form of medication.

 

[Truth Detector]

Wow. You just proved you're not as smart as you think you are,

Projection.

 

[Truth Detector]

Mr. Trumptard himself started telling his Trumptards, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah

Back to your padded cell mental case.

 

[archives]

Let's see yours shit-for-brains. I hope you have stocked up on your meds for November. There are going to be a lot of your fellow leftists needing some form of medication.

Ah no, I'll give you what is going to happen now, the GOP will win the House, too many historical and demographic factors working against the Democrats, and the Senate could go either way by a seat or two, currently, I'd say it favors the Democrats, but the election is two months away. From there little jimmy jordan will start umpteen "investigations," you'll get all wet in giddy, while few other than MAGA and Fox will pay attention

Now why would anyone need "meds" for what everyone pretty much sees as the reality?

 

[gfm7175]

Good predictions. Here's mine based on what occurred during Obamunism:

Yup that's probably at least what we'll see. Dems will be screaming and crying and BLMing afterwards...

 

[gfm7175]

Ah no, I'll give you what is going to happen now, the GOP will win the House, too many historical and demographic factors working against the Democrats,

Yup. The GOP will win the House, and win it BIG... Here in WI we're gonna flip Ron Kind's old seat red... 6 of our 8 House reps will be Republicans. Demonkkkrats whine about gerrymandering but maybe they should realize that Demonkkkrats are very concentrated in Dane and Milwaukee counties and are found hardly anywhere else...

and the Senate could go either way by a seat or two, currently, I'd say it favors the Democrats, but the election is two months away.

Hahahaha poor anchovies... He literally thinks that Demonkkkrats are favored to win the Senate atm hahahahaha TOO FUNNY!!!

Starting at a 46-46 tie with 8 "toss up" races:
NC - guaranteed red.
OH - guaranteed red.
WI - guaranteed red.
NV - will be red thanks to Hispanics voting red.

That's already up to 50 for R's... rut roh...

Then there's GA (likely red)
Then there's AZ (might go red due to Lake)
Then there's PA (will be tight, but Oz has momentum)
NH is a wildcard.

From there little jimmy jordan will start umpteen "investigations,"

... and the Demonkkkrats haven't been doing umpteen investigations??

you'll get all wet in giddy, while few other than MAGA and Fox will pay attention

I don't expect anything but kabuki theatre to happen from any Republican led investigation, and Demonkkkrat led investigations are really just political witch hunts at best.

Now why would anyone need "meds" for what everyone pretty much sees as the reality?

You don't even know what reality is.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

It is evidence whether or not a court has looked at it, dumbass.

Bullshit isn't evidence. And what you have presented is bullshit while continuing to claim it is evidence.
So.. what evidence do you have of massive fraud in the election. Give us a hint as to what it is. Then we can all see if it is bullshit or evidence.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Already done. Argument of the Stone fallacy. RQAA.

Fallacy fallacy

The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster (almost always Into the Night) claims another poster is using a fallacy without showing why it is a fallacy. This is always done by Into the Night to try to get people to think he is smarter than he really is. In reality, it is his version of a red herring so he doesn't have to support his position which he is unable to do with any logic, facts, or reason.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

Argument of the Stone fallacy. RQAA. True Scotsman fallacy. Cliche fallacy.

Fallacy fallacy

The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster (almost always Into the Night) claims another poster is using a fallacy without showing why it is a fallacy. This is always done by Into the Night to try to get people to think he is smarter than he really is. In reality, it is his version of a red herring so he doesn't have to support his position which he is unable to do with any logic, facts, or reason.

Pointing out someone has not given their "evidence" of massive fraud to the courts is not a true Scotsman fallacy.

 

[christiefan915]

Yup. The GOP will win the House, and win it BIG... Here in WI we're gonna flip Ron Kind's old seat red... 6 of our 8 House reps will be Republicans. Demonkkkrats whine about gerrymandering but maybe they should realize that Demonkkkrats are very concentrated in Dane and Milwaukee counties and are found hardly anywhere else...

Hahahaha poor anchovies... He literally thinks that Demonkkkrats are favored to win the Senate atm hahahahaha TOO FUNNY!!!

Pennsylvania Senate - Oz vs. Fetterman

Fetterman 49, Oz 44

Fetterman +5

 

[gfm7175]

Bullshit isn't evidence.

Actually, bullshit CAN be evidence.

And what you have presented is bullshit

And that's your opinion, but that doesn't change the truth that evidence has indeed been presented to you.

while continuing to claim it is evidence.

... because it IS evidence. You seem to be unaware of what evidence is.

So.. what evidence do you have of massive fraud in the election.

Illiteracy. Questions end with a question mark, not a period.

RQAA. You continue to ask the same question over and over again although it has already been answered for you countless times over the last roughly two years.

Give us a hint as to what it is. Then we can all see if it is bullshit or evidence.

RQAA.

 

[gfm7175]

Fallacy fallacy

The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster (almost always Into the Night) claims another poster is using a fallacy without showing why it is a fallacy. This is always done by Into the Night to try to get people to think he is smarter than he really is. In reality, it is his version of a red herring so he doesn't have to support his position which he is unable to do with any logic, facts, or reason.

Chanting.

You also seem completely unaware of what a fallacy fallacy is.

 

[gfm7175]

Fallacy fallacy

The fallacy fallacy occurs when a poster (almost always Into the Night) claims another poster is using a fallacy without showing why it is a fallacy. This is always done by Into the Night to try to get people to think he is smarter than he really is. In reality, it is his version of a red herring so he doesn't have to support his position which he is unable to do with any logic, facts, or reason.

Pointing out someone has not given their "evidence" of massive fraud to the courts is not a true Scotsman fallacy.

Continued chanting.