Ashli Babbitt’s killer Admitted He Didn’t Know If She Was Threat

Cool..from now on cops can kill anyone because they may be a meth fueled

You are just upset because this time it was a Black Police Officer- that shot a WHITE person.

Had this been the other way around as it normally is- YOU WOULD BE HAPPIER THAN A DOG WITH TWO DICKS ABOUT THE SHOOTING!

Let me tell you who is responsible for her death- SHE WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR HER OWN DEATH- DONALD TRUMP WAS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR HER DEATH!

And every one of those MOTHER-FUCKERS that broke into and entered the Capital Building should have been shot on sight!

NOW FUCK OFF AND GO SUCK ON A BIG SOUR LEMON!
 
Last edited:
Same could be said about the McCloskeys ..all they did was point a gun at a mob while standing on their own land
Dear fucking Neo-Nazi; people walking past a house is not mob attacking said house. Had the mob attacked the house then, yes, they had a right of defense.

That said, Kyle Rittenhouse proved that it's legal to shoot unarmed people if they are threatening you. If someone had shot Patricia McCloskey through the chest for threatening unarmed Americans, would you have supported the right of self-defense or just bitched and whined about African-American killers?

6t8ign.jpg
 
Dear fucking Neo-Nazi; people walking past a house is not mob attacking said house. Had the mob attacked the house then, yes, they had a right of defense.

That said, Kyle Rittenhouse proved that it's legal to shoot unarmed people if they are threatening you. If someone had shot Patricia McCloskey through the chest for threatening unarmed Americans, would you have supported the right of self-defense or just bitched and whined about African-American killers?

6t8ign.jpg

Kyle was being attacked u stupid fuck

And Ashli was unarmed
 
If any of the BLM protestors had been doing this to Mark McCloskey would he have the right to shoot?

View attachment 23212
More proof you're limp-dicked neo-Nazi fuckwad; you never answer questions but always ask them.


Every human being has an unalienable right of self-defense. The answer is yes. Why do you specify only shooting black people, Nazi?

If someone was attacking anyone, do they have a right of self-defense? Yes, they do, regardless of skin-tone or politics...not that fucking Nazis and WSE cocksuckers would agree.

Do you agree that people had a right to shoot Patricia McCloskey in self-defense? Yes or no, please. No fucking pussified quibbling bullshit.

6t8ign.jpg
 
More proof you're limp-dicked neo-Nazi fuckwad; you never answer questions but always ask them.


Every human being has an unalienable right of self-defense. The answer is yes. Why do you specify only shooting black people, Nazi?

If someone was attacking anyone, do they have a right of self-defense? Yes, they do, regardless of skin-tone or politics...not that fucking Nazis and WSE cocksuckers would agree.

Do you agree that people had a right to shoot Patricia McCloskey in self-defense? Yes or no, please. No fucking pussified quibbling bullshit.

6t8ign.jpg



Patricia McCloskey was not attacking anyone! She was defending her land etc against a mob of trespassers
 
Patricia McCloskey was not attacking anyone! She was defending her land etc

From what? People, even those you dislike, have a right of transit on public streets and sidewalks.

You should know that you are continuing to prove yourself to be less-than-bright and less-than-rational. It's a trait common to neo-Nazis.

It's also one of the reasons why the WSEs always rank neo-Nazis on the bottom tier. WSE leadership slang for neo-Nazis is "cannon fodder".

Do you understand this term, volsrock? Or is this another question that is too hard for you to answer with a yes or a no?
 
From what? People, even those you dislike, have a right of transit on public streets and sidewalks.

You should know that you are continuing to prove yourself to be less-than-bright and less-than-rational. It's a trait common to neo-Nazis.

It's also one of the reasons why the WSEs always rank neo-Nazis on the bottom tier. WSE leadership slang for neo-Nazis is "cannon fodder".

Do you understand this term, volsrock? Or is this another question that is too hard for you to answer with a yes or a no?

IT WAS NOT A PUBLIC STREET OR SIDEWALK....IT WAS PRIVATE LAND

FACT!


ST. LOUIS (AP) — Nine people charged with misdemeanor trespassing after a racial injustice protest in a private St. Louis neighborhood in June will not be prosecuted, city officials said Tuesday.

https://apnews.com/article/st-louis-crime-1be53d1b7288d35cfa912c083d0d212d




YOU ARE NOT TO BRIGHT ARE YOU?

Guess u do not know that roads sidewalks in a private community are just that private not public


Do you understand this? Or is this another issue that is too hard for you to understand?
 
Last edited:
From what? People, even those you dislike, have a right of transit on public streets and sidewalks.

You should know that you are continuing to prove yourself to be less-than-bright and less-than-rational. It's a trait common to neo-Nazis.

It's also one of the reasons why the WSEs always rank neo-Nazis on the bottom tier. WSE leadership slang for neo-Nazis is "cannon fodder".

Do you understand this term, volsrock? Or is this another question that is too hard for you to answer with a yes or a no?

got a link?
 
If cop is tresspassing (breaking the law) with a screaming mob and I am on my own land I have every right to point a gun
No shit. I'd ask you to prove why that's true but since you continue failing to answer questions honestly, if at all, I won't.

You're a fucking moron if you think it's smart to pull a weapon without the intention of using it. It's why you're cannon fodder.
The good news is that you'll always be on the front line. W00t! :party:

6t8qd2.gif
 
Ashlii Babbitt topic. Nothing but diversion.

Just as I indicated. No reasonable conversation….

OK. Then if officer pussy boots fired his weapon at an unarmed crowd, why didn't all those other officers who were so frightened fire too? For fear of civil or legal recourse? Could it be that the mob was unarmed?
 
Back
Top