Biden seeks to motivate voters from all parties against ‘Maga Republicans destroying

[LV426]

The Dobbs decision is current law, Alito's confirmation hearings are not.

LMAO!

So if Alito lied about Roe while being confirmed, why would he be telling the truth about the safety of other cases in his decision?

 

[LV426]

I didn't say I didn't know how to quote a post but to link to a post but I did so later.

Stop lying. Stop the excuses. It's tiring.

You keep denying you said it but here it is.

I never denied I said it, you just are hyper focused on taking things out of context because of how emotionally unstable I make you here every day.

So the GOP delayed and canceled primaries, didn't they? Yes.

So the GOP opposed mail-in balloting and destroyed the post office, didn't they? Yes.

So did Trump take to twitter in July 2020 to try and cancel the election out of concerns for "safety"? Yes.

So not sure how this lines up against your poor instincts when it came to Roe and everything else...seems like my post was pretty fucking accurate and prescient for April 2020.

 

[BidenPresident]

No, because all those decisions gave rights to people, none of them took rights away.

The tenth amendment states "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

The Supreme Court should have argued that the medical procedure of abortion is not murder by US law. Thus, allowing states to make it illegal violates the "powers...to the people".

 

[LV426]

Step 1: Delay or cancel primaries (already happened)

Had already happened by the time I wrote that post on 4/27/20.

Step 2: Oppose mail-in balloting by destroying the post office (already happening)

Had already happened by the time I wrote that on 4/27/20, and then DeJoy took it even further by destroying mail sorting equipment.

Step 3: Cancel the general election out of concerns for "safety"; concerns that could have been addressed, if not for Step #2.

So this prediction was made on 4/27/20, and then on 7/30/20, Trump tweeted this:

With Universal Mail-In Voting (not Absentee Voting, which is good), 2020 will be the most INACCURATE & FRAUDULENT Election in history. It will be a great embarrassment to the USA. Delay the Election until people can properly, securely and safely vote???
— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) July 30, 2020

So it would appear that my prediction from 4/27/20, which came from my 4/8 post where I literally said "Oh, I still think Trump and the GOP are going to try to cancel the election".

You know, the post you said was irrelevant except that it sets up every subsequent post of mine thereafter because of how linear time works.

You, on the other hand, are such a fucking sucker and bootlicker that you're making excuses for Alito and defending him even after he lied during a confirmation hearing where he was under oath, causing your instincts great embarrassment.

Somehow, you've made that poor judgment about me? I have nothing to do with that. I have nothing to do with the poor choice you made to place trust in the wrong people.

 

[LV426]

You need a basic American government class. Because something is universal does not mean it is a federal issue. Abortion laws have varied widely--time period, method, patient age eligibility, exceptions, parental permission, penalties. .

Most of those laws were ruled as unconstitutional until your buddy Alito reversed that.

After you had assured everyone that your vote on a joke candidate in 2016 wouldn't have an effect on anything, much less the loss of abortion rights.

 

[LV426]

Don't need to: Age requirements, medical requirements, reasons for divorce, spousal support, property division, common law.

Obergefell would like a word there.

It is a concurrent power exercised by both federal and state.

Where is that noted in the Constitution?

You should know that there were already SCOTUS decisions upholding Medicare as a federal law.

Medicare is for older citizens.

In the Constitution? Where? So you're contradicting yourself...you're saying health care is a state issue, yet you're saying it's not for older folks. So why is it not for older folks but it is for younger folks? Shouldn't Medicare be unconstitutional then since health care is a 10th Amendment issue?

Most states have some healthcare programs for those under 65.

You mean Medicaid, which is also a federal program.

I shouldn't have to explain such basic stuff to you but you obviously never learned it and are too lazy to look it up.

No, you just look for the easy answer because of how lazy you are, and now you're trying to project your abject laziness on me when you haven't sourced virtually A SINGLE FUCKING THING. And the reason why is obvious; you think you know everything, so you don't feel the need to support it. You are riding on your arrogance and nothing else.

 

[Flash]

No, because all those decisions gave rights to people, none of them took rights away.

You are saying whether something is established law is whether you like it or not. Some of those things were established law longer than Roe. The point was that the Supreme Court can change long-established law with one decision. Because you were happy segregation and gay marriage were overturned does not mean they had not been established law, just that law changes. Roe, just like those other issues, can be changed.

And let's remember that Roe WASN'T established law since Alito contradicted his claims during his confirmation hearing that it was by reversing it.

Roe was established law until Dobbs. What Alito said at his confirmation hearing did not change anything. It was established law until the court decided to change it, just like they changed segregation, gay marriage, interracial marriage, and many others.

I mean, you literally just said earlier that because of what Alito wrote, those other freedoms aren't under threat to be taken away by Alito.

Nope. I was teaching you what Dobbs said since you had not read it. I don't know what will happen in the future and neither do you.

We both wasted our vote in 2016 by voting for a candidate who had no chance of winning in our state so we had no impact on the electoral vote. If neither of us had voted or we had voted for a different candidate, the result would have been the same.

You obviously don't understand that a single vote would not have changed the results. You come up with wild claims to attack people knowing they make no sense.

 

[LV426]

My discussion had nothing to do with whether we could believe Alito but whether Dobbs said it only applied to abortion.

You said that Alito said that it only applies to abortion and that other rights are safe, however you also said that you don't know how the court will rule in the future.

So you can't say that Dobbs only applies to abortion if you're also saying you don't know how the court will rule in the future.

That is how language works.

 

[LV426]

You claimed it did not because you had not read it and I posted the paragraph to prove what it said.

No, what I said was that Alito was lying when he said it wouldn't apply to other decisions, and that's a point you have been avoiding, I guess because you think Alito will only lie about abortion and nothing else.

So when this court overturns Obergefell, what are you going to say then? You'll probably try to find something to attack me on instead of acknowledging your consistently poor judgment.

 

[Monad Portal]

No, what I said was that Alito was lying when he said it wouldn't apply to other decisions, and that's a point you have been avoiding, I guess because you think Alito will only lie about abortion and nothing else.

authority figures dont lie.

what the fuck is wrong with you?

why do you hate society?

 

[LV426]

That was my only point and you start talking about confirmation hearings, whether Alito tricked us, etc. to divert from the fact that you got it wrong because you had not read the decision when this discussion occurred.

A point no one asked for...of course I acknowledge that Alito wrote the decision; my thing is that he was lying when he said it wouldn't apply to other decisions, and for some unknown reason to everyone you believe him.

 

[LV426]

You are saying whether something is established law is whether you like it or not.

No, I'm talking about RIGHTS.

That's something you're not very familiar with because of your authoritarian instincts.

All those decisions you listed gave rights to people, they didn't take rights away.

Some of those things were established law longer than Roe.

Ah, but those laws were unconstitutional because of how they took away people's rights.

That's why they were all set as new precedent.

The point was that the Supreme Court can change long-established law with one decision.

Exactly, so throwing your vote away on a joke candidate was probably a mistake.

So if SCOTUS can just change long-established law, why do you believe Alito when he says his Dobbs decision doesn't affect other rights?

 

[LV426]

Because you were happy segregation and gay marriage were overturned does not mean they had not been established law, just that law changes.

So then you can't offer anyone the assurance that Dobbs won't affect other decisions for other privacy rights.

You have just moved the bar.

 

[LV426]

It was established law until the court decided to change it, just like they changed segregation, gay marriage, interracial marriage, and many others.

So then why are you saying that those other decisions won't be reversed via Dobbs?

 

[LV426]

Nope. I was teaching you what Dobbs said since you had not read it.

I read it, you did not and I know you didn't because you aren't quoting from it here.

Secondly, you said that the other decisions are safe because of what Alito wrote, but then you also said that you can't predict how the court will rule in the future.

So what makes you think that Alito will abide by what he wrote in Dobbs?

 

[LV426]

I don't know what will happen in the future and neither do you.

You JUST SAID EARLIER that Alito said the other decisions are safe, so they're safe.

Now, and only on this thread, have you begun moving the bar by saying you don't know what will happen in the future.

That's a goalpost shift you did to try and save face because you never thought in a million years that you would be wrong about Roe.

 

[Althea]

How did it do that?

You people can't get any more outraged than you already are.

Maybe stop doing fascism.

It's killing them that Biden's team successfully stole the term MAGA and turned it into the proper derogatory term that it is.

Kinda takes all the steam out of it.

 

[Geeko Sportivo]

Your right to parent your children as you think best, the right of schools and parents to decide what books are available to students, the right of schools and parents to decide what to teach and not have state legislatures dictate what cannot be discussed in the classroom, the right of freedom of the press from those who consider it an enemy of the people, the right of private social media sites to decide who can post and what can be posted without government interference, the right of private cruise lines to require a vaccination of passengers when they are traveling to a location that requires the shots before entering, the right of expert state employees to testify in legislative hearings even if their views conflict with political decisions.....

There is only one way to stand up to TRUMPTARDEDNESS AND BULVERISM- and that is to go down and pull the Democrat lever at the polls.

Join the millions of others who have had enough of Donald Trump and his TRUMPTARDS destruction of the United States Of America.

Trumptards do not listen to reason, do not care about what is real or true, and cannot be reckoned with. IN OTHER WORDS, YOU MAY AS WELL BE ARGUING WITH A BOX OF HAIR- Because Yakuda is about as dumb as a box of hair- and far too politically jaded to ever listen to anything you have to say.

But your vote will say a lot!

Your vote will teach people like Yakuda that he is in the minority of public opinion and that everyone is not as hateful, self-centered, racist, misogynistic, careless of others, or as ignorant and anti-democratic as he is.

Of course, he is another sad sack Trumptard that will never admit that they are or were defeated- BUT THAT'S HIS PROBLEM- NOT OURS!

LET EM' EAT CROW! Let him stew in his own shit! Let him drown in his own drooling SPIT!

 

[LV426]

We both wasted our vote in 2016 by voting for a candidate who had no chance of winning in our state so we had no impact on the electoral vote.

That is not an excuse to throw your vote away on a joke candidate.

f neither of us had voted or we had voted for a different candidate, the result would have been the same.

This is how you abscond responsibility for your choices.

Pathetic.

You have no sense of civic duty and you treat it like a joke because you're a joke.

 

[Althea]

Not really. You Reichwingers just got your feelz hurt by being labeled for what you are.

He was very clear the first time he made the comments, and simply reiterates it on a daily basis.
It seems to be the perfect campaign slogan, which makes it even more ironic.


Of course, trump stole it from Reagan and pretends that it was his own idea.