A University doesn't have to recognize black, err, LGBT student group

AProudLefty

AProudLefty

The remora of JPP
Contributor


Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor agreed Friday night to temporarily block a lower court order that required Yeshiva University to recognize a “Pride Alliance” LGBTQ student club.

The order from Sotomayor – who has jurisdiction over the lower court in the case – suggested that the full Supreme Court is still considering the issue and will issue a more permanent order at a later time.

For now, the university is temporarily shielded from having to recognize the group.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/09/politics/yeshiva-university-supreme-court-sotomayor/index.html

I get that it's a private University which is probably like a private school. However, the Jews are in the minority, the LGBT Jews even more so. And how many Jewish Universities are there in the USA? It ironically doesn't want to recognize certain Jewish groups. The Holocaust ring any bell?
 
AProudLefty said:


Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor agreed Friday night to temporarily block a lower court order that required Yeshiva University to recognize a “Pride Alliance” LGBTQ student club.

The order from Sotomayor – who has jurisdiction over the lower court in the case – suggested that the full Supreme Court is still considering the issue and will issue a more permanent order at a later time.

For now, the university is temporarily shielded from having to recognize the group.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/09/politics/yeshiva-university-supreme-court-sotomayor/index.html

I get that it's a private University which is probably like a private school. However, the Jews are in the minority, the LGBT Jews even more so. And how many Jewish Universities are there in the USA? It ironically doesn't want to recognize certain Jewish groups. The Holocaust ring any bell?
Click to expand...

Just like Freedom of Religion is also Freedom from Religion, Freedom of Association is Freedom from Association...or should be. Forcing people to be tolerant breeds intolerance, since it places the rights of one group over the rights of another.

Better, IMO, is to push tolerance through incentives such as tax breaks. Want to have a private school of bigotry? Go for it, but unless it meets state or federal guidelines of fairness and equal access, no tax breaks, no low-cost loans to the school or students, no form of any governmental financial assistance at all.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Just like Freedom of Religion is also Freedom from Religion, Freedom of Association is Freedom from Association...or should be. Forcing people to be tolerant breeds intolerance, since it places the rights of one group over the rights of another.

Better, IMO, is to push tolerance through incentives such as tax breaks. Want to have a private school of bigotry? Go for it, but unless it meets state or federal guidelines of fairness and equal access, no tax breaks, no low-cost loans to the school or students, no form of any governmental financial assistance at all.
Click to expand...

Yes I understand. But do you see the irony?
 
AProudLefty said:
Yes I understand. But do you see the irony?
Click to expand...
Yes.

I❤Irony

irony-funny-pictures-15.jpg
 
AProudLefty said:
LOL. Good one. Warning the below down this is a full blown irony that will iron your face.

https://i.imgur.com/PnEYEFR.png

https://expo-homosexuels-lesbiennes.memorialdelashoah.org/en/exhibition.html

https://i.imgur.com/dQQfgAP.gif
Click to expand...
There's a huge difference between forcing someone to do something and not desiring to associate with them.

Example; while I respect the right of the elderly RWNJs to give each other handjobs, I'm against forcing anyone to give them a handjob.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
There's a huge difference between forcing someone to do something and not desiring to associate with them.

Example; while I respect the right of the elderly RWNJs to give each other handjobs, I'm against forcing anyone to give them a handjob.
Click to expand...

Well Jews not wanting to associate with certain Jews because of who they are is the irony.

The Nazis forced certain people NOT to associate with certain people. It has the reversed effect.
 
AProudLefty said:
Well Jews not wanting to associate with certain Jews because of who they are is the irony.

The Nazis forced certain people NOT to associate with certain people. It has the reversed effect.
Click to expand...

Isn't there something about it in their religious beliefs?

You're comparing the Jews at Yeshiva University to Nazis? Now that's what I call irony! LOL

Should the LGBT start buying cans of spray paint? :rofl2:

Remember this? https://yucommentator.org/2018/10/swastika-graffiti-yu-residencies-prompts-investigation/
Swastika Graffiti on YU Residencies Prompts Investigation
Vandelism.jpg
 
My episode is over and it's bedtime for me. Notice the fucking morons in a couple of the pictures drew the swastikas backwards. LOL
 
AProudLefty said:


Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor agreed Friday night to temporarily block a lower court order that required Yeshiva University to recognize a “Pride Alliance” LGBTQ student club.

The order from Sotomayor – who has jurisdiction over the lower court in the case – suggested that the full Supreme Court is still considering the issue and will issue a more permanent order at a later time.

For now, the university is temporarily shielded from having to recognize the group.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/09/09/politics/yeshiva-university-supreme-court-sotomayor/index.html

I get that it's a private University which is probably like a private school. However, the Jews are in the minority, the LGBT Jews even more so. And how many Jewish Universities are there in the USA? It ironically doesn't want to recognize certain Jewish groups. The Holocaust ring any bell?
Click to expand...

The repuke party of treason and its barbaric aka their so-called fascist way of a sewer nature at violating all core values of America is at war against education which includes everyone and regardless of who they are. There is no entitlement here and there should be no sense of privilege but a sense of disgust, outrage and anger against this un-American repuke venture that is at war against that which supports the common decency of humanity. Additionally, this repuke rot that is unclean and a morally depleted rogue clump of gutter creatures and their foreign conspires of the toilet who are too uncivilized to either support or co-exist in what a civilized society represents:

Republicans' war on education is the most crucial part of their push for fascism
From Pre-K through college, Republicans' war on education is meant to cement the GOP's grip on power
https://www.salon.com/2021/12/02/re...-most-crucial-part-of-their-push-for-fascism/
 
Last edited:
AProudLefty said:
As I have stated, I understand that.
Click to expand...

As long as they keep it private in their cesspool of their form of education that should be denied any public taxpayer paid assistance either at funding such a un-academic atrocity on society, and that of course includes their curriculum of morally deplorable practices and acts of teaching all of that which goes against the factual nature of history and the proper rules of education. This atrocity is all part of the plan of the repuke party of treason that sold its soul to tRump and the devil that caused the downfall of many of their own followers at doing the bidding of foreign enemies to destroy democracy from within Yet, democracy goes beyond the U.S. borders, which of course the diabolical idiots missed the mark on that. Also, if these cesspool institutions of graphic and barbaric education were to realize if about 70% of so-called whites were to do a DNA ancestry analysis, they might find out they are not all that white they think they are in America as a multiracial nation. This going back generations and to which the original Americas are the Native American Indians to which may of these so-called white people, in particular, have genetic relations with too.
 
Last edited:
AProudLefty said:
Maybe you misunderstood me. I wasn't comparing the University to Nazis.
Click to expand...

Then what were all the Nazi references about? Who were like the fucking Nazis in this situation?

I understand you weren't talking about Trump's Pedo Nazis and WSE traitors. :)
 
Why does the LBGT community (I refuse to use more letters that that) need a university recognized club?
Why does anybody need a university recognized club?

I didn't belong to any university recognized clubs.
I sparred in Rip Valenti's gym,
not the university's gym,
and, because I couldn't get hammered,
I slowly nursed drinks listening to 60s r&b or jazz in clubs that weren't university recognized.

What's wrong with that?
 
NiftyNiblick said:
Why does the LBGT community (I refuse to use more letters that that) need a university recognized club?
Why does anybody need a university recognized club?

I didn't belong to any university recognized clubs.
I sparred in Rip Valenti's gym,
not the university's gym,
and, because I couldn't get hammered,
I slowly nursed drinks listening to 60s r&b or jazz in clubs that weren't university recognized.

What's wrong with that?
Click to expand...

All the Universities refused to recognize my club; YMWDBALB*

beer-wet-tshirt-bewbs.gif

*Young Men Who Drink Beer and Like Boobs
 
AProudLefty said:
I was saying that it's ironic.
Click to expand...

I disagree. :)

It's their religion. Remember when the RWNJs whined that allowing gay marriage would force churches to marry gays? Note the irony of forcing a religious institution to accept something against their religion. LOL

Better to use incentives. Enforce the religious tax codes...which go largely unenforced because of the fucking Evangelistas.

https://www.irs.gov/charities-non-profits/churches-religious-organizations
Tax Information for Churches and Religious Organizations

https://www.firstcitizens.com/comme...uide-for-churches-and-religious-organizations
What are the qualifications for tax-exempt status?
According to the IRS, five main requirements must be met for a house of worship to qualify for 501(c)(3) status, which labels it as a kind of charity.

  • The organization must operate exclusively for religious, scientific, educational or charitable purposes
  • The net earnings of the organization may not provide an advantage to a shareholder or private individuals
  • The organization can't devote a substantial part of its activity to influencing legislation
  • The organization can't intervene in political campaigns
  • Any activities or purposes by the organization must be legal and in line with public policy
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top