"Don't go to college, go to a trade school"

Produce one.

Here's another one...

J6 "attack" Seriously?

Ransacking offices and papers is not an attack.

Leftist terrorists rioted for WEEKS when Trump was elected, night after night. Bashing in store fronts, burning cars up, causing millions in damages. Same with the inauguration.

The DOCUMENTED incidents from the leftist terrorists make J6 look like a joke. There is no comparison to the vile destruction.

What the fuck are you even saying here? Jesus, it's like you copied every single stupid comment off JPP and put it into your incoherent post.
 
The most major thing about having a college degree vs. not is lifetime earning potential.

Someone with a PHD is going to have a higher lifetime earning potential than someone with a Master's, who will have a higher lifetime earning potential than someone with a Bachelor's, who will have a higher earning potential than someone with just a HS diploma or GED.
I agree as a statistical average lifetime earnings go up with more college

But statistical averages are an abstract mathematical concept which do not represent any one individual. There is a wide distribution in all the datasets.

It seems fair to say that your probability generally increases for higher lifetime earnings the more education you get.
 
There exists no legitimate argument against student debt forgiveness.

All it has are upsides.
So you take money from person A that person A earned and could be spending on his family. Then you give person A's money to person B who didn't earn it so he can spend it on things that he wants. You want to use the force of the gun to take money away from people that earned it and give it to people that did not earn it.. That may be legal but it isn't right. When a person buys a car they should pay for it themselves and not expect YOU to pay for it for them, right? Because if think YOU should be paying for someone else's car I have my eye on a new Corvette.
 
Last edited:
list the legitimate arguments FOR student debt forgiveness

1. It stimulates the economy by giving ~50M more to spend in the consumer market, which is 70% of the economy but drives 100% of the growth

2. It doesn't add any more to the debt because that money has already been spent.

3. Forgiving the debt moves it off our books and reduces the total debt.

4. A sizeable portion, perhaps even a plurality of Pell Grant recipients, is owed by borrowers of color, so there is also a social justice component to this as well.

5. The economy gains nothing by having people make student loan payments, but it gains quite a lot if instead of paying loans, those people spend in the consumer market, start a family, and/or buy a house

6. Removing the debt obligation frees borrowers to start their own businesses since they can get loans because of their good credit scores that aren't marred by ridiculous student loan payments.
 
Back
Top