The Greenland surface mass year has ended with 471 billion tons of new snow and ice

.
Naturally you'll not read that in WaPo, NYT, Guardian or the BBC.

View attachment 23142
http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/#c8397

Better illustration.

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20220903_173056.jpg
    Screenshot_20220903_173056.jpg
    102.2 KB · Views: 14
Last edited:
I guess agw is bullshit designed to inculcate human self hate and nihilistic philosophies.
:magagrin:

This is what Prof. Richard Lindzen had to say to the House of Commons climate committee.

Stated briefly, I will simply try to clarify what the debate over climate change is really about. It most certainly is not about whether climate is changing: it always is. It is not about whether CO2 is increasing: it clearly is. It is not about whether the increase in CO2, by itself, will lead to some warming: it should. The debate is simply over the matter of how much warming the increase in CO2 can lead to, and the connection of such warming to the innumerable claimed catastrophes. The evidence is that the increase in CO2 will lead to very little warming, and that the connection of this minimal warming (or even significant warming) to the purported catastrophes is also minimal. The arguments on which the catastrophic claims are made are extremely weak – and commonly acknowledged as such. They are sometimes overtly dishonest.

https://judithcurry.com/2012/02/27/lindzens-seminar-at-the-house-of-commons/
 
This is what Prof. Richard Lindzen had to say to the House of Commons climate committee.

Stated briefly, I will simply try to clarify what the debate over climate change is really about. It most certainly is not about whether climate is changing: it always is. It is not about whether CO2 is increasing: it clearly is. It is not about whether the increase in CO2, by itself, will lead to some warming: it should. The debate is simply over the matter of how much warming the increase in CO2 can lead to, and the connection of such warming to the innumerable claimed catastrophes. The evidence is that the increase in CO2 will lead to very little warming, and that the connection of this minimal warming (or even significant warming) to the purported catastrophes is also minimal. The arguments on which the catastrophic claims are made are extremely weak – and commonly acknowledged as such. They are sometimes overtly dishonest.

https://judithcurry.com/2012/02/27/lindzens-seminar-at-the-house-of-commons/

these are just nazis who want to kill.

they always do everything in bad faith.

this is not about science.

it's about good and evil.
 
.
Naturally you'll not read that in WaPo, NYT, Guardian or the BBC.

View attachment 23142
http://polarportal.dk/en/greenland/surface-conditions/#c8397

Interesting reading. Especially compared to your misunderstanding of what they are showing.
Your argument seems to be because one day shows more precipitation then loss, that means that every day shows the same thing. I'm sorry to tell you but every day is not Sept 2, 2022.

Dig a little deeper into the website you posted and you will start to see the trends over the years, not just one day.

CS2_uk_HD_small.jpg

combined_EN.png
 
maggot

The Greenland surface mass year has ended with 471 billion tons of new snow and ice

maggot wants everybody to believe that any fresh snow deposits- anywhere in the world- will remain there.

Send him to Pakistan.


Haw, haw..............................................haw.
 
Al Gorians won't be happy until the Laurentide Ice sheet covers half of North America, again. :palm:


laurentide-ice-sheet-a2fffa99-ad73-4011-b5ed-1e4916457e4-resize-750.jpg
 
Back
Top