It’s fairly simple…

[Jarod]

1) Did Trump own those documents?

No


2) Did Trump return those when asked, then subpoenaed by a grand jury?

No


That my friends is called a crime!

Refute it…. You can’t!

 

[SmarterthanYou]

did hillary destroy a computer and phones that were to be used as evidence? it's fairly simple

 

[Jarod]

did hillary destroy a computer and phones that were to be used as evidence? it's fairly simple

No, she didn’t. She destroyed a phone and computer, where did you get the “to be used as evidence” part?

 

[BidenPresident]

Tired of hearing about the goddam documents. Arrest Trump or drop it.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

No, she didn’t. She destroyed a phone and computer, where did you get the “to be used as evidence” part?

what was requested by the DOJ????????

 

[Jarod]

Tired of hearing about the goddam documents. Arrest Trump or drop it.

I think they will after November

 

[Jarod]

what was requested by the DOJ????????

Untrue. Simply not reality.

Also… Requested by the FBI, does not = “was to be used as evidence.”

 

[Jarod]

So simple that can’t respond!

Other than But… but… hillary.

 

[evince]

did hillary destroy a computer and phones that were to be used as evidence? it's fairly simple

Years before her computers were requested


There was no protocol about computers back then


She handed over every ticking thing they asked for immediately


No classified documents were found


They determined some emailed danced around information that had classification


That was her big offense idiot


That was why Comey didn’t prosecute anything


But Comey sure wanted to make her sound bad for the election in progress

 

[evince]

I think they will after November

He’s not on the ballot


Just charge him already

 

[Jarod]

Trump had the actual documents on his carpet... He refused to turn them over.


Case closed, Both Obstruction of Justice and 18 U.S.C. 2071.

 

[evince]

Trump had the actual documents on his carpet... He refused to turn them over.


Case closed, Both Obstruction of Justice and 18 U.S.C. 2071.

I thought they laid them on the carpet for the picture

 

[Jarod]

I thought they laid them on the carpet for the picture

I dont know, not really relevant.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

the worst democrat apologists ever, so transparent about not giving a fuck about the rule of law, only Democrat victory over America..........fucking traitors

 

[Jarod]

the worst democrat apologists ever, so transparent about not giving a fuck about the rule of law, only Democrat victory over America..........fucking traitors

Explain? The rule of law Would require Trump be prosecuted. What he did was against the law on at least two accounts, am I wrong?

 

[evince]

the worst democrat apologists ever, so transparent about not giving a fuck about the rule of law, only Democrat victory over America..........fucking traitors

Why would Comey damage her candidacy and then not charge her idiot?

 

[evince]

He’s a life long Republican


Why wouldn’t he charge her if he could convict her

 

[Jarod]

He broke the law. He then tried to hide that he broke the law from the FBI.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

1) Did Trump own those documents?

No


2) Did Trump return those when asked, then subpoenaed by a grand jury?

No


That my friends is called a crime!

Refute it…. You can’t!

obviously not if they are not documents he was not entitled to have.......you keep overlooking that fact.......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

Tired of hearing about the goddam documents. Arrest Trump or drop it.

since there is nothing to arrest him for, that leaves an obvious solution.....