Gore-Backed Car Firm Gets Large U.S. Loan

I've never lost an argument to you. You got pissed at constantly losing so, like any coward, attacked the innocent.

:rofl:

Never lost one? Thats hilarious.

There are numerous examples of you flat out refusing to continue because you were beaten. That is when you start with the insults.

And the indignation is funny to me. Sure, I made a joke about your wife. But since she doesn't come here, it doesn't effect her at all. The insult was aimed at you. And the fact that you have these arbitrary rules of who can be insulted and who cannot is laughable. You are quite possible the most obnoxious and and insulting poster on these forums. You insult people for having differing opinions, insult people's families, insult someone in a thread about their death, and insult people just for giggles.

Now, when I respond to you trying to say (and not for the first time) that I frequent prostitues by saying I am funding your kid's college ed, you want to try and claim the moral high ground.

Sorry, but you lose there too. Its bullshit and you know it. But you do love to play it up.

Have fun with that. I know I am getting a few laughs from it.

:tongout:
 
then call it what it is. Don't make up scary scenarios on computer models to trick stupid people into believing they control climate.

Sun cycles, cosmic ray flux and natural planetary cycles have always changed climate. You can't attribute warming to humans when we don't even have an accurate understanding of the climate system to begin with.

People who really understand science see the flaws in the theory. you might not be included in that group.

I have never said that the electric and hybrid cars were anything but working to get us off fossil fuels.

From the article this thread is based on:

"Fisker's government loans will come from a $25 billion program established by Congress in 2007 to help auto makers invest in the technology to meet a new congressional mandate to improve fuel efficiency."

Gore may be a "global warming loon", but this loan program is about increasing fuel efficiency.
 
Last edited:
I would take zero pride in handing southern racist his ass. Astonishing that a college grad could be such a simpleton. I bet he acts superior to his slut wife.
 
Step 1 - Call a genuine problem a conspiracy
Step 2 - Ridicule any attempt to solve the problem
Step 3 - Ignore the facts.



Just a tip, our dependency on fossil fuels is not a "created crisis" or a "supposed crisis". The problem is real.

But scarcity is not the argument. Carbon emissions is the proposed reason we need to create incentives for green cars.

And these proponents of these specious argument AlgoreCo inc. etc. are fattening themselves from the fear they created. and later on, they will tax us all to breathe.

You need wake your idiot neocon ass up to the greater realities of the world.
 
then call it what it is. Don't make up scary scenarios on computer models to trick stupid people into believing they control climate.

Sun cycles, cosmic ray flux and natural planetary cycles have always changed climate. You can't attribute warming to humans when we don't even have an accurate understanding of the climate system to begin with.

People who really understand science see the flaws in the theory. you might not be included in that group.

...and the vast majority of "people who really understand science" come down on the other side. The fright is that created to threaten the avarice of the RW.
 
...and the vast majority of "people who really understand science" come down on the other side. The fright is that created to threaten the avarice of the RW.

The truth is not a democracy, however. look into the data yourself.

How about the avarice of Al gore?
 
I would take zero pride in handing southern racist his ass. Astonishing that a college grad could be such a simpleton. I bet he acts superior to his slut wife.
Now I see why you took up a new moniker. You too, were embarrassed by my intellectual superiority and, like a coward, attacked the innocent around me.
 
:rofl:

Never lost one? Thats hilarious.

There are numerous examples of you flat out refusing to continue because you were beaten. That is when you start with the insults.

And the indignation is funny to me. Sure, I made a joke about your wife. But since she doesn't come here, it doesn't effect her at all. The insult was aimed at you. And the fact that you have these arbitrary rules of who can be insulted and who cannot is laughable. You are quite possible the most obnoxious and and insulting poster on these forums. You insult people for having differing opinions, insult people's families, insult someone in a thread about their death, and insult people just for giggles.

Now, when I respond to you trying to say (and not for the first time) that I frequent prostitues by saying I am funding your kid's college ed, you want to try and claim the moral high ground.

Sorry, but you lose there too. Its bullshit and you know it. But you do love to play it up.

Have fun with that. I know I am getting a few laughs from it.

:tongout:

Like the loser and coward that you are, you attacked the innocent.
 
The truth is not a democracy, however. look into the data yourself.

How about the avarice of Al gore?

So the majority of scientists are wrong and the oil company supported minority knows the real truth? Would you prefer a plutocracy?
You choose the avarice of Exxon/Mobil? Please point me to info where I may find how much money Gore has made on the environment, real numbers in order to reach an honest conlusion.
 
But scarcity is not the argument. Carbon emissions is the proposed reason we need to create incentives for green cars.

And these proponents of these specious argument AlgoreCo inc. etc. are fattening themselves from the fear they created. and later on, they will tax us all to breathe.

You need wake your idiot neocon ass up to the greater realities of the world.

The loan program is about increased fuel efficiency. Whether that mandate is brought about by bogus science or by the dependency on foriegn oil is largely irrelevant. A significant increace in fuel efficiency is good for our nation.
 
The loan program is about increased fuel efficiency. Whether that mandate is brought about by bogus science or by the dependency on foriegn oil is largely irrelevant. A significant increace in fuel efficiency is good for our nation.

Not true. The very existence of the program itself lends creedence to the BIG LIE of anthropogenic global warming.

A significant increase fuel efficiency is not worth the fascist-ification of the car market.

The big lie is the head of the beast, it's tentacles must be destroyed, despite the apparent meaty succulence of them.
 
Not true. The very existence of the program itself lends creedence to the BIG LIE of anthropogenic global warming.

A significant increase fuel efficiency is not worth the fascist-ification of the car market.

The big lie is the head of the beast, it's tentacles must be destroyed, despite the apparent meaty succulence of them.

We are burning thru the fossil fuels at an amazing rate. You think our being dependent on foriegn oil is a good thing?

A move to electric cars would provide a huge boost in our independence.

To deny that is ignorant.
 
We are burning thru the fossil fuels at an amazing rate. You think our being dependent on foriegn oil is a good thing?

A move to electric cars would provide a huge boost in our independence.

To deny that is ignorant.

We need to get at our local resources which are kept off limits my environmentalists and friends of the oil cartel.

And no part of the solution should be government subsidies. You're truly a fascist if you believe in this gore deal.

If it such a problem, let oil prices rise and let the demand for cheaper mileage drive innovation.
Short circuiting reality with massive government guesses is corrupt, fascistic and stupid.
 
Not true. The very existence of the program itself lends creedence to the BIG LIE of anthropogenic global warming.

A significant increase fuel efficiency is not worth the fascist-ification of the car market.

The big lie is the head of the beast, it's tentacles must be destroyed, despite the apparent meaty succulence of them.
Whether or not somebody believes in the lie of anthropogenic global warming it is a good thing to reduce dependency on foreign energy.
 
Whether or not somebody believes in the lie of anthropogenic global warming it is a good thing to reduce dependency on foreign energy.

Not through subsidies. The LIE provides the supposed IMMEDIACY which the government is claiming necessitates a TOP DOWN FASCIST EFFORT.

As i said. Let the market function. Let fuel rise and the need for cheaper mileage drive innovation.

You neocons have lost your fucking minds.
 
Not through subsidies. The LIE provides the supposed IMMEDIACY which the government is claiming necessitates a TOP DOWN FASCIST EFFORT.

As i said. Let the market function. Let fuel rise and the need for cheaper mileage drive innovation.

You neocons have lost your fucking minds.
I think a drive to remove oil as the means of transportation energy would be in order. Instead work towards using domestic resources of Natural Gas (which we have plenty of).

However, that being said, a reduction in the need for foreign energy will make the US a safer place in the end.

But heck, you can continue promoting giving our money in great amounts to other nations for their resources. I hear that you love that kind of thing.
 
I think a drive to remove oil as the means of transportation energy would be in order. Instead work towards using domestic resources of Natural Gas (which we have plenty of).

However, that being said, a reduction in the need for foreign energy will make the US a safer place in the end.

But heck, you can continue promoting giving our money in great amounts to other nations for their resources. I hear that you love that kind of thing.


We could reduce the need for foreign energy by getting access to our nearby deposits, and building more refineries. The prices are driven by war, cartelism, etc, we could deal with those, but we won't go into all that now.

Im not opposed to more efficient cars, but I'm not for the fascist market manipulation and cronyism of top down solutions. You are apparently.

How does it feel to be a fascist and finally love big brother?
 
This is not about hating fuel effieciency. This is about turning over public funds to people who fearmonger their way into being, based on the immediacy inspired by the lies they told.

This is about basic economic structure.

Are you neocons really fascist now?
 
We could reduce the need for foreign energy by getting access to our nearby deposits, and building more refineries. The prices are driven by war, cartelism, etc, we could deal with those, but we won't go into all that now.

Im not opposed to more efficient cars, but I'm not for the fascist market manipulation and cronyism of top down solutions. You are apparently.

How does it feel to be a fascist and finally love big brother?
No, you are supporting sending our treasure overseas to other producers. There is no possible way even if we were drilling full-tilt on what we have that we could produce enough oil for our uses. We could, however, produce enough natural gas.

What I promote is different than what I state here, which is solely a separate truth.

This simple statement is true: If we are no longer reliant on foreign energy sources the US will be a safer place.
 
Back
Top