What about "mostly agree" do you not understand.
There is no "agreement". They rate both left and right sources equally. So you and Tia Gargler are proven wrong.
What about "mostly agree" do you not understand.
The source is dismissed.
Yes we know Democrats senators approved of lying to the Grand jury and obstruction of justice. Big surprise.The president was acquitted on both articles of impeachment. The prosecution needed a two-thirds majority to convict but failed to achieve even a bare majority. Rejecting the first charge of perjury, 45 Democrats and 10 Republicans voted “not guilty” and on the charge of obstruction of justice the Senate was split 50-50.
Thanks for your comment, it allowed me to repost this, just for the record.I could give a shit whether you watch it or not. Somebody will and if one more does, it is mission accomplished.
Oh brother. They rate them just the same.
Friar Tucker is not a journalist.
Don't watch this video. Remain in your bubble of stupidity. It wears well on you.
Don't watch the video. Remain in your bubble of stupidity. It wears well on you.
Oh I did watch for a few minutes. It's just his usual unhinged rants.
No, they don't. They play favorites giving more favorable ratings to Left leaning sites and media and less favorable ones to Right leaning. By "favorable" I mean they tend to either minimize or exaggerate a particular source's degree of radicalness and accuracy. I gave an example of that for the case above. This site uses reliable sources, BUT... For a Left leaning source they'd leave out the "but" part and say the source was more reliable.
Don't watch it again. Please.
I said don't watch it.
Friar Tucker is not a journalist.
Let's look!
CNN "Skews Left"
Fox News "Hyper-partisan Right"
MSNBC "Skews Left"
Anyone really think that's accurate? MSNBC is about a hyper-partisan to the Left as they come, just for starters.
Look at Occupy Democrats versus Infowars. There's not a nickel's worth of difference between these two in terms of their propaganda and slanted views, Left and Right. Yet, Occupy Democrats is placed as less radical and more truthful than Infowars.
If you shift everything on the Right of that chart up about a square, and left about half, or so, a square that fixes that. Everything on the Left of the chart needs to go down and left by about a square in each direction.
There are of course, exceptions to this, but on the whole that brings closer balance to accuracy than what's depicted.
Like I said, Mediabias is just as biased as other so-called fact check sites.
Even when proven wrong, you just double down.
![]()
Look for yourself.
You can't "prove" anything by using circular references.
https://www.seekfind.net/Fallacies_of_Circular_Reasoning.html#.YwP4hnHMKUk
What you are claiming is that Mediabias is accurate because they say they're accurate. That's meaningless. Aside from that, I was referencing that chart you posted.