Torture impairs ability to tell the truth

If the police started shooting crack dealers in the head it would reduce drug related crimes. But it would still be against the law.

The experts did no such thing. They rendered the opinion that they were told to render.

But the fact remains, the USA signed a treaty/pact agreeing to never use waterboarding to interogate prisoners.
There you go, typical bullshit liberal position, giving foreign terrorists rights of American citizens and expecting the US military to act like a City police force.
 
There you go, typical bullshit liberal position, giving foreign terrorists rights of American citizens and expecting the US military to act like a City police force.

Just showing you how the US military acting "like a City police force" works.
 
There you go, typical bullshit liberal position, giving foreign terrorists rights of American citizens and expecting the US military to act like a City police force.

No, I expect the US Military to abide by treaties we signed.

And I expect you to lie.
 
kind of like, the meaning of 'is'.

tell us, does changing the definition of anything really change what it is from then on?
Obviously I'm referring to two definitions. One by the UN, and one by Merriam-Webster. In the case of terrorists, the CIA used the dictionary definition and did not cross that line.
 
Obviously I'm referring to two definitions. One by the UN, and one by Merriam-Webster. In the case of terrorists, the CIA used the dictionary definition and did not cross that line.

I'm inclined to believe The Southern Man on this subject. Since we now know that victims of torture exhibit an inability to be truthful, we can conclude that The Southern Man's claims to be aware of CIA torture methods are the result of his victimhood.
 
Because of Democrats, now everyone knows about the details of once-secret CIA interrogation methods.

The Southern Man believes that "because of Democrats, now everyone knows about the details of once-secret CIA interrogation methods."

What further indications does one need to see that The Southern Man's inability to tell truth from fiction is a direct result of The Southern Man's first-hand knowledge of CIA torture?

Shouldn't The Southern Man get some reparation payments?
 
Obviously I'm referring to two definitions. One by the UN, and one by Merriam-Webster. In the case of terrorists, the CIA used the dictionary definition and did not cross that line.

The question is, did we agree to abstain from torture according to the definiton in the dictionary or according to the UN resolution?
 
Back
Top