WSJ - 11 sets of top secret documents seized!

Meanwhile DJT is out as free as a bird going anywhere he wants to doing anything he wants to. Gee,...wonder why? I know why.........And so will you. ;)


:magagrin:
 
Seems that the documents weren't "nuclear codes" after all. Instead, it's a mishmash of stuff including handwritten notes, info on the President of France, photo albums, and who-knows-what.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...rty-receipt-show-agents-found-trove-rcna42793

Of the 11 sets of documents claimed, less than half were top secret or above. Most were secret or confidential (confidential is the lowest classification btw).

It still doesn't answer the question why if these documents and their recovery was so vital and immediate, the FBI or national archives personnel didn't take them on previous visits, or why the DoJ waited nearly two years to go and get them.
 
Stone said:
Consider yourself PLAYED. Like a fiddle I might add...:laugh: This is going to be good.

:magagrin::trumpdance::trumpdance:
Click to expand...

Yes we know your real dream was a big cell mate to rock you to sleep for the rest of your life


I’m happy you will finally see your dreams come true
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Seems that the documents weren't "nuclear codes" after all. Instead, it's a mishmash of stuff including handwritten notes, info on the President of France, photo albums, and who-knows-what.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/do...rty-receipt-show-agents-found-trove-rcna42793

Of the 11 sets of documents claimed, less than half were top secret or above. Most were secret or confidential (confidential is the lowest classification btw).

It still doesn't answer the question why if these documents and their recovery was so vital and immediate, the FBI or national archives personnel didn't take them on previous visits, or why the DoJ waited nearly two years to go and get them.
Click to expand...

The highest rated secrets included


At least you gave up on the lie they were planted by the FBI
 
evince said:
Yes we know your real dream was a big cell mate to rock you to sleep for the rest of your life


I’m happy you will finally see your dreams come true
Click to expand...

The babblings of an old hag do not concern me other than to laugh at. You make no sense most of the time.
 
BidenPresident said:
So? Why should any care about Hillary?
Click to expand...

Because she did the same shit and far more. She knowingly and deliberately--not to mention criminally--circumvented federal law regarding document preservation and official business regulations by installing and using a private, unsecure, server in her home to do all of her electronic mail and transactions while Secretary of State. She then, unsupervised, removed tens of thousands of e-mails from that server upon its discovery by the government, and subsequently used bleach bit to make the recovery of those documents impossible. That is, the government has no idea what she had on that server and had no way to recover it. That too is criminal.

She had lots of classified e-mail and other materials on it as well. Only some of those are known due to the above. One of her lawyers was found to have partial backup copies of the server in his office, unsecured and to include classified information. This opens the question of how many copies exist and who might have them. Again, more criminal activity on the Hildabeast's part.

That the FBI didn't do a damn thing about any of this in the end speaks volumes about selectivity in how these cases are handled depending on the political leanings of the person under investigation. I could say the same thing about the Awan brothers scandal. That's yet another case where Democrats in Congress mishandled classified information on an ongoing basis for an extended period of time (years), and yet the whole thing was swept under the rug when exposed.

I'm not defending Trump in the least here. I'm pointing out the rank hypocrisy and selective persecution of political figures by party affiliation and political leanings. There is a serious problem here, and the FBI and DoJ are a major part of it.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Because she did the same shit and far more. She knowingly and deliberately--not to mention criminally--circumvented federal law regarding document preservation and official business regulations by installing and using a private, unsecure, server in her home to do all of her electronic mail and transactions while Secretary of State. She then, unsupervised, removed tens of thousands of e-mails from that server upon its discovery by the government, and subsequently used bleach bit to make the recovery of those documents impossible. That is, the government has no idea what she had on that server and had no way to recover it. That too is criminal.

She had lots of classified e-mail and other materials on it as well. Only some of those are known due to the above. One of her lawyers was found to have partial backup copies of the server in his office, unsecured and to include classified information. This opens the question of how many copies exist and who might have them. Again, more criminal activity on the Hildabeast's part.

That the FBI didn't do a damn thing about any of this in the end speaks volumes about selectivity in how these cases are handled depending on the political leanings of the person under investigation. I could say the same thing about the Awan brothers scandal. That's yet another case where Democrats in Congress mishandled classified information on an ongoing basis for an extended period of time (years), and yet the whole thing was swept under the rug when exposed.

I'm not defending Trump in the least here. I'm pointing out the rank hypocrisy and selective persecution of political figures by party affiliation and political leanings. There is a serious problem here, and the FBI and DoJ are a major part of it.
Click to expand...






It’s over


You lost
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Because she did the same shit and far more. She knowingly and deliberately--not to mention criminally--circumvented federal law regarding document preservation and official business regulations by installing and using a private, unsecure, server in her home to do all of her electronic mail and transactions while Secretary of State. She then, unsupervised, removed tens of thousands of e-mails from that server upon its discovery by the government, and subsequently used bleach bit to make the recovery of those documents impossible. That is, the government has no idea what she had on that server and had no way to recover it. That too is criminal.

She had lots of classified e-mail and other materials on it as well. Only some of those are known due to the above. One of her lawyers was found to have partial backup copies of the server in his office, unsecured and to include classified information. This opens the question of how many copies exist and who might have them. Again, more criminal activity on the Hildabeast's part.

That the FBI didn't do a damn thing about any of this in the end speaks volumes about selectivity in how these cases are handled depending on the political leanings of the person under investigation. I could say the same thing about the Awan brothers scandal. That's yet another case where Democrats in Congress mishandled classified information on an ongoing basis for an extended period of time (years), and yet the whole thing was swept under the rug when exposed.

I'm not defending Trump in the least here. I'm pointing out the rank hypocrisy and selective persecution of political figures by party affiliation and political leanings. There is a serious problem here, and the FBI and DoJ are a major part of it.
Click to expand...

Hillary was a US Senator long ago. She neither holds public office nor aspires to. Dead issue.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top