Oh Trump is in trouble.

Jarod said:
Garland is a stone cold killer, he waited until all the pundits and all the Trumper’s made fools of themselves. He waited to give trump enough time to release the warrant himself, then he pounced.
Click to expand...

Yes. Trump will lose the fight against the US Department of Justice. Lose bad.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
My bet is, Garland has realized he, the DoJ, and FBI have screwed the pooch on how they went about this raid. Now Garland is scrambling to try and put a fig leaf of credibility on it. If that weren't the case, the warrant wouldn't have been sealed in the first place. The operation wouldn't have been a surprise raid like it was.

If Garland, the DoJ, and FBI can't convince the public-at-large that the raid was on the up and up, they just handed Trump and his wing of the Republican party a huge issue that will cause them to turn out in larger numbers in November. For the Leftists here, that's the reality of this, like it or not.
Click to expand...

Federal warrants are always sealed until someone asks for them to be unsealed. They are never unsealed before the search. Trump has had two days to release the warrant, he refused to do so despite many calls for him to do it. Garland waited a respectful amount of time and is now asking to have it unsealed. And he asked earlier, everyone with claim he was grandstanding.
 
Jarod said:
The Justice Department moves to un-seal the warrant.


Trump did not want it out or he would’ve put it out. He fucked up!
Click to expand...

Need to see affidavit. The search warrant affidavit has to be specific not only about the place to be searched, but this purported evidence or criminal activity that forms the basis for the search request. Police can seize only what is described in the warrant, pursuant to the underlying affidavit.
 
volsrock said:
Need to see affidavit. The search warrant affidavit has to be specific not only about the place to be searched, but this purported evidence or criminal activity that forms the basis for the search request. Police can seize only what is described in the warrant, pursuant to the underlying affidavit.
Click to expand...

Yes, god forbid Mr. Trump ever varied from the letter of the law.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
My bet is, Garland has realized he, the DoJ, and FBI have screwed the pooch on how they went about this raid. Now Garland is scrambling to try and put a fig leaf of credibility on it. If that weren't the case, the warrant wouldn't have been sealed in the first place. The operation wouldn't have been a surprise raid like it was.

If Garland, the DoJ, and FBI can't convince the public-at-large that the raid was on the up and up, they just handed Trump and his wing of the Republican party a huge issue that will cause them to turn out in larger numbers in November. For the Leftists here, that's the reality of this, like it or not.
Click to expand...

What kind of reasoning is the above??

The warrant was sealed and the raid "a surprise" because DOJ concluded Trump couldn't be trusted. The department tried other means to get back the documents - Garland mentioned that - but Trump continued to keep them.
Now DOJ is asking the court to unseal the warrant and inviting Trump to oppose its revealing at the hearing. So we'll see which of them, if either. doesn't want the public to know.
 
Last edited:
T. A. Gardner said:
My bet is, Garland has realized he, the DoJ, and FBI have screwed the pooch on how they went about this raid. Now Garland is scrambling to try and put a fig leaf of credibility on it. If that weren't the case, the warrant wouldn't have been sealed in the first place. The operation wouldn't have been a surprise raid like it was.

If Garland, the DoJ, and FBI can't convince the public-at-large that the raid was on the up and up, they just handed Trump and his wing of the Republican party a huge issue that will cause them to turn out in larger numbers in November. For the Leftists here, that's the reality of this, like it or not.
Click to expand...

Apparently Trump has got a copy of the warrant, So why isn't Trump making the warrant public if this would exonerate him??????????????????
 
Mira Largo no doubt has security tapes


Trumps lawyer with them the whole time


No shred of evidence something was planted


You can count on that everyone elected who claimed American officers were planting evidence fear what the FBI found
 
T. A. Gardner said:
My bet is, Garland has realized he, the DoJ, and FBI have screwed the pooch on how they went about this raid. Now Garland is scrambling to try and put a fig leaf of credibility on it. If that weren't the case, the warrant wouldn't have been sealed in the first place. The operation wouldn't have been a surprise raid like it was.

If Garland, the DoJ, and FBI can't convince the public-at-large that the raid was on the up and up, they just handed Trump and his wing of the Republican party a huge issue that will cause them to turn out in larger numbers in November. For the Leftists here, that's the reality of this, like it or not.
Click to expand...

Nah, Garland is responding to the unrelenting attacks on the FBI, attacks generated without even seeing the evidence the Justice Dept bought before the Judge. Plus, as Wray confirmed yesterday, potential attacks on FBI employees

Are many warrants made public when they involve ongoing investigations? And Trump should have known this was coming given he was issued a subpoena requesting the same material last May

And once again you are framing consequences even before the facts come out
 
volsrock said:
Need to see affidavit. The search warrant affidavit has to be specific not only about the place to be searched, but this purported evidence or criminal activity that forms the basis for the search request. Police can seize only what is described in the warrant, pursuant to the underlying affidavit.
Click to expand...

That is untrue, police look up the plain sight concept of search warrants, if they see ANYTHING that is evidence of a crime... They can take it. You are so ignorant.
 
volsrock said:
Need to see affidavit. The search warrant affidavit has to be specific not only about the place to be searched, but this purported evidence or criminal activity that forms the basis for the search request. Police can seize only what is described in the warrant, pursuant to the underlying affidavit.
Click to expand...

Is that what they are saying on alt right media?
 
T. A. Gardner said:
My bet is, Garland has realized he, the DoJ, and FBI have screwed the pooch on how they went about this raid. Now Garland is scrambling to try and put a fig leaf of credibility on it. If that weren't the case, the warrant wouldn't have been sealed in the first place. The operation wouldn't have been a surprise raid like it was.

If Garland, the DoJ, and FBI can't convince the public-at-large that the raid was on the up and up, they just handed Trump and his wing of the Republican party a huge issue that will cause them to turn out in larger numbers in November. For the Leftists here, that's the reality of this, like it or not.
Click to expand...

The problem with your bet is you have picked a sure loser. The documents and items were subpoenaed from Trump in June and he failed to turn them over. That means Trump is the one that screwed the pooch. Now it will be interesting to see what crimes were listed in the warrant. The warrant was sealed because all search warrants are sealed. It is the standard for law enforcement. The person on who the search warrant is served can reveal it but law enforcement doesn't.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top