Trump Takes the Fifth Amendment in New York Deposition

SmarterthanYou said:
so you can't read? or you refuse to?
Click to expand...

I have no fucking idea what she was trying to get at, but the obvious quotes are from the First and Second Amendment.

Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Amendment II
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Click to expand...

Like the Declaration of Independence's "unalienable rights" a lot of our freedoms are implied. Too many fucking morons on both the Left and the Right, meaning the anti-freedom authoritarian assholes, believe the Constitution gives us our rights. You and I both know it limits the powers of the Federal government and the States.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
I have no fucking idea what she was trying to get at, but the obvious quotes are from the First and Second Amendment.



Like the Declaration of Independence's "unalienable rights" a lot of our freedoms are implied. Too many fucking morons on both the Left and the Right, meaning the anti-freedom authoritarian assholes, believe the Constitution gives us our rights. You and I both know it limits the powers of the Federal government and the States.
Click to expand...

Term freedom is overused, as I’ve said previously, many have turned the abstract concept into a bumper sticker cliche, have even seen traffic laws as simple as stopping at a Stop sign framed as a grievous violation of one’s personal freedom

Rights may be implied, but as Locke explained with the social contract, many of those rights are surrendered in order to live in a stable society. Common sense dictates that rights, implied, or specified in a document, are not absolute, but based upon reason, not desire

All of which makes freely applying the term “freedom” to any situation, especially one that may limit what one wants do or not do, is absurd, it is much more abstract than that
 
archives said:
Term freedom is overused, as I’ve said previously, many have turned the abstract concept into a bumper sticker cliche, have even seen traffic laws as simple as stopping at a Stop sign framed as a grievous violation of one’s personal freedom

Rights may be implied, but as Locke explained with the social contract, many of those rights are surrendered in order to live in a stable society. Common sense dictates that rights, implied, or specified in a document, are not absolute, but based upon reason, not desire

All of which makes freely applying the term “freedom” to any situation, especially one that may limit what one wants do or not do, is absurd, it is much more abstract than that
Click to expand...

In the end, freedom is used to justify all criminal acts of Trump because he is supposed to be totally free from law.
 
archives said:
Term freedom is overused, as I’ve said previously, many have turned the abstract concept into a bumper sticker cliche, have even seen traffic laws as simple as stopping at a Stop sign framed as a grievous violation of one’s personal freedom

Rights may be implied, but as Locke explained with the social contract, many of those rights are surrendered in order to live in a stable society. Common sense dictates that rights, implied, or specified in a document, are not absolute, but based upon reason, not desire

All of which makes freely applying the term “freedom” to any situation, especially one that may limit what one wants do or not do, is absurd, it is much more abstract than that
Click to expand...

Freedom isn't overused, but I readily agree a lot of people call any limitation on their right to murder kids with a car or play with dynamite at the city park as a limitation of their "rights". They're idiots. Ignore them as fucking morons.

It's the same bullshit Trump is whining about now because the National Archives want their documents returned. Notice how many Pedo Don fans support Trump's rights to steal from our nation.

Surrender what rights? This goes directly to the concept of one's right to swing their fist ends at another person's nose. NO ONE has a right to harm another. Period. Isn't that implied? Common sense?

When a company claims it has a right to poison the water supply, We, the People are not abiding by common sense.

When a person steals from We, the People and is either allowed to do it or disallowed based solely on their political affiliation, then We, the people are not abiding by common sense.
 
BidenPresident said:
Donald J. Trump declined to answer questions from the New York state attorney general’s office on Wednesday, a surprising gamble in a high-stakes legal interview that is likely to determine the course of a civil investigation into his company’s business practices.

In a statement released shortly after the questioning began on Wednesday, Mr. Trump said he would invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination, explaining that he “declined to answer the questions under the rights and privileges afforded to every citizen under the United States Constitution.”

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2022/08/10/nyregion/trump-testimony-investigation-news

Nothing to hide, right Mr. Trump?!
Click to expand...

Have you ever had Miranda rights read to you? They will have to make their case entirely on any evidence they produce. He has no reason to assist in their prosecution of him. That's why this exists. You people think he "incited" an insurrection by saying protest peacefully and patriotically so why would be do aid them in their prosecution of him. This will be their downfall.
 
Yakuda said:
Have you ever had Miranda rights read to you? They will have to make their case entirely on any evidence they produce. He has no reason to assist in their prosecution of him. That's why this exists. You people think he "incited" an insurrection by saying protest peacefully and patriotically so why would be do aid them in their prosecution of him. This will be their downfall.
Click to expand...
:lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup::lolup:

This is beyond ludicrous.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Winner, winner! Who, besides me, bet Trump would plead the Fifth?

2h1bqc.jpg


Only criminals take the Fifth.

https://www.newsweek.com/donald-tru...-resurfaces-allies-use-it-jan-6-panel-1660741

"You see the mob takes the Fifth. If you're innocent, why are you taking the Fifth Amendment?" - Donald J. Trump
Click to expand...

KAFKATRAPPING

This is a perfect example of that.
 
BidenPresident said:
^^Always defends Trump. Always denies he is defending Trump.
Click to expand...

That has nothing to do with defending anyone. It is a logical fallacy--whoever makes it and it appears Trump at one point used it too--to proclaim someone guilty because they take the Fifth or proclaim their innocence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top