Trump melts down as Fox News ignores him, features GOP voters ditching MAGAworld

Poor Richard Saunders said:
I tell you what gfm. To prove that impaction works I will make a bet with you. I will give you a marshmallow gun that can fire 40 feet with 100 small marshmallows about 1/2" in size. Then I will construct a 'mask' using 3 layers of chain link fence with the fences 2" apart.. All the holes will be 1-7/8" or larger. Then you stand 5' away from the first fence. I will give you $50 for every marshmallow you get through the 3 fences. You will give me $15 for every one you don't get through all three fences. Are you willing to take the bet? If you are correct, it should be an easy $5,000 for you. If I am correct, I will make at most $1,500. But based on the way impaction works, you will lucky get about 12% of the marshmallows through the 3 fences. This is simple physics that you seem to want to deny.
Click to expand...
You suck at paying attention to what I say.

Poor Richard Saunders said:
It's funny how you claim holy link and claim the science the EPA publishes isn't science while continuing to rely on your non-scientific nonsense that fails to take into account the 3 ways that filters actually work. So where is your science? Where is your engineering? Where is your mathematics?
Click to expand...
Already presented to you.

Poor Richard Saunders said:
Your idiotic claims aren't evidence of anything other than your idiocy. If you think the studies referenced by the EPA are wrong as to how filtering works then you should be showing us how it is wrong instead of just using a logical fallacy to discount it. The fact that you can't dispute impaction, diffusion, or interception speaks volumes as to what science you are relying on. You are like a three year old who can't understand that objects in motion require a force to change direction. And we haven't even gotten to brownian motion yet.
Click to expand...
I've already disputed the BS that you've stolen from others because you can't think for yourself.
 
gfm7175 said:
You suck at paying attention to what I say.


Already presented to you.


I've already disputed the BS that you've stolen from others because you can't think for yourself.
Click to expand...

ROFLMAO.. So you can think for yourself because you just discount science that has proven to be true? That is not thinking. That is denial.

Once again, you have failed to provide any math, engineering or science backing your claim that masks don't work. Meanwhile the rest of us know that a body in motion requires a force to change direction which is why impaction works in a mask. Denying actual science while claiming only you are using science seems to be your stock in trade.
 
gfm7175 said:
It is irrelevant whether or not I show it to a court. It exists, regardless.


I've shown it to you already, dumbass. Pay attention.
Click to expand...

So, you can't provide your evidence to a finder of truth that would allow for both sides to make their arguments. But your evidence is still real?
 
Joe Capitalist said:
https://apple.news/A6eR-nMmzS9Sp18m3aKYXRg

Fox News is taking Trump out of the spotlight after bombshell January 6th evidence emerged. The New York Times reporting that Fox is "bypassing' Trump" in favor of showcasing other Republicans, effectively displacing him from his the news cycle. It comes as GOP voters tell Fox News they don’t want Trump in 2024.
Click to expand...

How many Trump threads can you create in one day? You are starting to rival the king and that ain't a compliment.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
ROFLMAO.. So you can think for yourself because you just discount science that has proven to be true? That is not thinking. That is denial.

Once again, you have failed to provide any math, engineering or science backing your claim that masks don't work. Meanwhile the rest of us know that a body in motion requires a force to change direction which is why impaction works in a mask. Denying actual science while claiming only you are using science seems to be your stock in trade.
Click to expand...
Ignoring my posts that provided those things does not make them go away, dude. You can't pretend my posts away. They are public record for all to see.
 
gfm7175 said:
Ignoring my posts that provided those things does not make them go away, dude. You can't pretend my posts away. They are public record for all to see.
Click to expand...

You are correct. Your failure to provide actual evidence is public record. No need to pretend anything away since you have made specious claims that are unsupported.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top