The Biden-Manchin-Sinema climate bill

Cypress

Well-known member
How the biggest US energy bill ever could revive Biden’s climate agenda

-- Economic modelling shows that the compromise legislation might bring the United States within range of meeting its climate commitments --

As little as two weeks ago, a centrepiece of US President Joe Biden’s climate agenda seemed to be dead in the water, because of opposition from members of Congress. But after a surprise turn of events, the US Senate is poised to approve the revived legislation — a massive spending bill that would make unprecedented investments in clean-energy innovation and deployment. Researchers say the legislation, if enacted, will reinvigorate efforts by the United States — and the world — to halt global warming.

The bill, revised by key Democrats in the evenly divided Senate, would invest around US$370 billion in a variety of low-carbon energy technologies over the coming decade. This includes tax credits for businesses to develop such technologies, which could reduce costs and attract more private-sector investment. The expenditure comes on top of more than $200 billion in clean-energy and climate investments that lawmakers approved in a major infrastructure bill last year.

"I think we will look back on this as a historic moment,” says Dan Lashof, who leads US operations for the World Resources Institute, an environmental think tank based in Washington DC. “This bill will have a tremendous impact on innovation and cost reductions for a whole set of clean-energy solutions that the world needs to reach its climate goals.”

https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-022-02119-7
 
By how many degrees will this bill change the temperature of the Earth?
 
So you admit, after three decades of denial, that humans have largely been responsible for global warming by burning fossil fuels.

Nope. I asked a simple scientific question about a bill you support. :dunno:

Why do you refuse to answer?
 
Nope. I asked a simple scientific question about a bill you support. :dunno:

Why do you refuse to answer?

Why would you ask the question, unless you (very belatedly) suddenly realized burning of fossil fuels has heated the planet?

That's three decades of climate denial abandoned in short order.
 
Why would you ask question, unless you (very belatedly) suddenly realized burning of fossil fuels has heated the planet?

That's three decades of climate denial abandoned in short order.


So ZERO degrees is your answer. White lib privilege :palm:
 
Back
Top