Democraps define themselves by the amount of cum they can gobble.
Ironic, since you're still vomiting up the gallons of twump spoo you chugged for 4 years.
Democraps define themselves by the amount of cum they can gobble.
This is the first time I've actually experienced retardation exuding from a post.
Is it just that she is standing up for law and order?
Is it because she dares to question the almighty (Trump)?
Her voting record is one of the most conservative in the House, is devotion to Trump more important than conservative values?
No I don't have any problems with a fair investigation and letting the chips fall where they may. In fact I want it. But I have a huge problem with the kangaroo "investigation" that the sham J6 committee is conducting. The majority leader and the minority leader should be allowed to put the members they want on the committee. Both parties should have subpoena power and both parties should be able to call witnesses. Both parties should have the right to crossexamine witnesses. If they did that the committee would have the chance at arriving at the truth.So you do not like her because of her willingness to investigate Trump. I understand that from you, but I was hoping for an intelligent poster to respond.
So you are going to deflect instead of discuss the topic?
She is standing up for the laws against 1) trying to remain in office after knowing you lost. 2) Instigating a riot. 3) Offering aid and comfort to a domestic enemy of the United States.
Its not a law, but she is also standing up for TRUTH, JUSTICE and THE AMERICAN WAY!
she's a globalist corporatist traitor to all humanity, like her deceased namesake.
What has she done to show herself to be a globalist corporatist traitor?
No I don't have any problems with a fair investigation and letting the chips fall where they may. In fact I want it. But I have a huge problem with the kangaroo "investigation" that the sham J6 committee is conducting. The majority leader and the minority leader should be allowed to put the members they want on the committee. Both parties should have subpoena power and both parties should be able to call witnesses. Both parties should have the right to crossexamine witnesses. If they did that the committee would have the chance at arriving at the truth.
not being on board with maga.
I see, intelligent response,
DID YOU KNOW SHE VOTED WITH TRUMP 98% OF THE TIME?
i guess trying to execute him for treason is in the 2%?
She is not trying to execute him or even accuse him of treason.
So, its the personality and not the policy agenda you like about Trump? She supported his policy 98% of the time.
I answered your straightforward question, and I addressed your attempt to deflect.
You still have not addressed the question posed in the OP. I can understand why you would refuse, but its telling.
No it's the policy agenda?
How do you get "personality" From america first?
It's an anti-globalization sentiment, applicable in all countries by all individuals.
No they did not. Nancy Pelosi would not allow the minority leader to select who he wanted on the committee. Both sides don't have subpoena power either. So stop lying Jarod.Both parties had that right, Liz Cheney is the Republican Co-Chair.
No they did not. Nancy Pelosi would not allow the minority leader to select who he wanted on the committee. So stop lying Jarod. Both sides don't have subpoena power either.
A Republican had subpoena power and cross exam ability.
The witnesses were almost all reluctant Trump Republicans.