No. You cannot make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats go away by pointing to Republicans.
Republicans are insane.
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
No. You cannot make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats go away by pointing to Republicans.
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
And Socialism's biggest flaw is that it tries to deny and change human nature.
evince
Truthmatters
The proof of republican party cheating is in the American court system for decades of documents of findings of them cheating and being punished by the courts
Cold, hard court documented proof in the court records
There is no like record in the courts for the Democratic Party flatulence face
Shoresy said:
So, Jarod, NOW you are arguing AGAINST abortion, allowing children to have surgery to conform to the 'gender identity', and calling all that 'healthcare'??????!?
You are denying all of your own arguments now????????!?
evince
Truthmatters
Nope
It’s tendency for corruption
Just like the republicans ideas that corporations never cheat
Both are fucking stupid failed ideas
So you consider the ending of the Cold War a 'dark turn'???????!?
Right, which is that high because of incomes at the top that are bringing it up.
If you subtract the income of the top 1%, what becomes the median household income?
This is just like when you were caught lying about wages growing during Trump. You said that wages grew by 3.1% after Trump's tax cut, except that wages for the top 1% grew by 3.7%, while the median HH income only grew by 0.5%, which turns to a negative number when you factor inflation.
What you like to do is take a very general number and apply it to everything evenly, because that's what sophists do.
But that always gets smacked down because you aren't a detail-oriented person, and these things inevitably end up in the details. So here's an example of catching the lie:
Wage growth accelerates for workers, but salaries for the 1% just reached a new high
So you would run with that general headline to prove that Trump's tax cut grew people's wages, however, when we dive into the numbers in greater detail, we see something very troubling:
So remember that 3.1% number because it's going to be important for the next part:
So wages generally grew by 3.1% in that example, but wages for the top 1% grew by 3.7%. So that means that wages for everyone else grew by much, much less than 3.1%.
So when talking about this, are you not placing more weight on the incomes of the 1% since they are placing more weight on wage growth?
In other words, wage growth appears to have only occurred for the top 1% since the median household income only grew by 0.5% Y-o-Y for 2018-2019. Inflation over the same period was 1.8%, so wages declined for most workers in real dollars after the tax cut.
Last edited:
Sybil talks to herself????!? I thought she talked to YOU! She's YOUR hallucination!
T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Wrong. Socialism requires people to be altruistic to make it work. The way Socialism works to paraphrase George Bernard Shaw is, He who can does. He who can't takes. Both have corruption and other evils present, but Socialism by its very nature drives more towards those evils than Capitalism.
Socialism is an economic system, not a political or psychological one.
The Soviet Union dissolved because of ethnic nationalism, and a quasi-coup by Yelstin and the leaders of the Ukraine and Belorussia socialist republics.
The thought that the Soviets would cave and run up the white flag of surrender simply because Reagan increased Pentagon spending by 20 percent doesn't pass the laugh test.
These are the people that ate rats and sawdust rather than surrender to legions of Nazi invaders.
Not really, no.
It's simply an economic system that gives the people ownership over certain parts of the economy.
But you're telling on yourself by saying collective ownership can only work if everyone is altruistic.
Nope. CONGRESS caused that.
Nope. DEMOCRATS did that.
Nope. Just cut government spending. Communism doesn't work.
Nope. Al Qaeda was not created by arming the Mujahedeen. The Mujahedeen stole their weapons from the Soviets and bought a few more from Pakistan.
He didn't.
He didn't.
Fiction won't help you.
Don't you think is time to move on from 1989?????!?
It's not socialism that has collapsed the economy 4 times in 30 years, but it has been socialism that saved it.
You're welcome.
No, you cannot make the evidence of election fraud by Democrats disappear by pointing to any Republican, dude.
Communism is not a political system. It is a form of socialism. It is government ownership of markets. It can only be implemented by oligarchy or dictatorship. It is theft of wealth. It doesn't produce anything.
No. At the beginning. It never had much of an economy, since the prevailing economic system was communism.
Government never bailed out anything.
Government never bailed out anything.
Zero.
Government never bailed out anything. Indeed, it was their policies and interference that caused crashes to lengthen into economic depressions.
Capitalism has never failed. It is the only economic system that creates wealth.
Socialism is theft of wealth. It does not create wealth. By any definition, that IS a failure.
For what? Tyranny???!?
No thanks.
evince
Truthmatters
Yes they are. They are also a denial of history.
Chanting Holy Words won't help you.