Pedodent Biden to commit felony and give IDs to ILLEGAL ALIENS

Section 1324 of title 8 of the US code makes it a federal felony to encourage illegals to live here and this clearly is a violation. He can't do this but he's doing it and repubs are letting him.

More of that trolling bullshit with your slithering and gutter sources. Consider some facts versus your trolling fiction:
Your beloved and lawlessly hacked in tRump and un-American repuke insurgency of the gutter engaged in the following un-American atrocities in violation of U.S. Constitutional law when it comes to engaging in crimes against humanity, etc:

500,000 Kids, 30 Million Hours: Trump’s Vast Expansion of Child Detention

U.S. Customs and Border Protection carried out almost half a million child detentions during the Trump administration, data shows. More kids were held for 72 hours or more.

When U.S. Customs and Border Protection holds migrant children in custody, the child’s detention is supposed to be safe and short. That’s true whether the child is with a parent or without one.But new data shows that over the last four years, detention times lengthened as the number of children held at the border soared to almost half a million. The detentions, which include both unaccompanied children and children with their families, peaked last year at over 300,000, with 40 percent held longer than the 72-hour limit set by a patchwork of legislation and a court settlement.“The government regularly violated the 72-hour rule,” said Dr. Bill O. Hing, a University of San Francisco law professor and immigration lawyer who was part of an inspection group touring border stations in the summer of 2019 at the height of the crisis. Hing said he witnessed minors being held for increasingly long times in unsafe facilities designed to hold adults, not children and babies.The rising numbers of children detained at the border with one or more family members have received relatively little attention. Yet at the same time that detentions of unaccompanied minors were skyrocketing, so were detentions of children who arrived with families, government data shows. The federal government carried out almost 40,000 detentions of children with families in 2014; last year, that shot up to almost 250,000."
https://www.themarshallproject.org/...urs-trump-s-vast-expansion-of-child-detention

As a result of the effects of this tRump atrocity that put a terrible reflection on America's image in the world as follows:
President Biden’s Executive Actions on Immigration

President Biden has issued the following immigration-related Executive Orders (EOs) and administrative policy changes since his first day in office (Click the title below to jump to a description of each EO/policy change):
Proclamation on Ending Discriminatory Bans on Entry to The United States – January 20, 2021
Executive Order on the Revision of Civil Immigration Enforcement Policies and Priorities – January 20, 2021
Preserving and Fortifying Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) – January 20, 2021
Proclamation on the Termination Of Emergency With Respect To The Southern Border Of The United States And Redirection Of Funds Diverted To Border Wall Construction – January 20, 2021
Executive Order on Ensuring a Lawful and Accurate Enumeration and Apportionment Pursuant to the Decennial Census – January 20, 2021
Memorandum Reinstating Deferred Enforced Departure for Liberians – January 20, 2021
US Citizenship Act of 2021
DHS Statement on the Suspension of New Enrollments in the Migrant Protection Protocols Program – January 20, 2021
Proclamation on the Suspension of Entry as Immigrants and Non-Immigrants of Certain Additional Persons Who Pose a Risk of Transmitting Coronavirus Disease – January 25, 2021
Executive Order on Creating a Comprehensive Regional Framework to Address the Causes of Migration, to Manage Migration Throughout North and Central America, and to Provide Safe and Orderly Processing of Asylum Seekers at the United States Border – February 2, 2021
Executive Order on Restoring Faith in Our Legal Immigration Systems and Strengthening Integration and Inclusion Efforts for New American – February 2, 2021
Executive Order on the Establishment of Interagency Task Force on the Reunification of Families – February 2, 2021
Executive Order on Rebuilding and Enhancing Programs to Resettle Refugees and Planning for the Impact of Climate Change on Migration – February 4, 2021
Memorandum for the Secretary of State on the Emergency Presidential Determination on Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2021 – April 16, 2021
A Proclamation on the Suspension of Entry as Nonimmigrants of Certain Additional Persons Who Pose a Risk of Transmitting Coronavirus Disease 2019 – April 30, 2021
Memorandum for the Secretary of State on the Emergency Presidential Determination on Refugee Admissions for Fiscal Year 2021 – May 3, 2021
Proclamation on Ending Discriminatory Bans on Entry to The United States – January 20, 2021
This proclamation lifts certain restrictions on immigrant visas for nationals of Burma, Eritrea, Iran, Venezuela, Kyrgyzstan, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Tanzania, and Yemen. US Embassies and Consulates in those countries can resume visa processing and must ensure that pending visa and waiver applications are not prejudiced by the previous bans.

From 2017-2020, former President Trump issued a series of travel bans preventing nationals of Muslim-majority and select African countries from entering the United States. President Biden rescinded the travel bans (Executive Order 13780, Proclamation 9645, Proclamation 9723, Proclamation 9983) effective immediately. In his proclamation, Biden characterized the travel bans as “a stain on our national conscience.”

The initial travel ban (Section 3 of the “Executive Order 13769”) suspended the issuance of visas to nationals from Iran, Iraq, Sudan, Syria, Libya, Somalia, and Yemen for 90 days. The ban drew sharp criticism because it targeted Muslim-majority countries, and led to protests at airports across the country and legal challenges. In subsequent versions of the travel ban, the Trump administration added non-Muslim-majority countries and extended the timeframe for the ban. In a 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ultimately upheld (in Trump v. Hawaii) the third version of the travel ban, Presidential Proclamation 9645. The bans have halted the admissions of targeted groups and prevented families from reunifying or even from visiting one another. Muslim Americans and religious leaders of many faiths praised Biden for ending the ban."

https://cmsny.org/biden-immigration-executive-actions/
 
Last edited:
With Biden’s open borders, illegals (non-citizens) are pouring into our country.

This causes our schools, our hospitals, our cities and our social welfare systems to be overwhelmed.

Out of control crime, inflation, our borders, and food shortages.

All of this is on Biden.


Trump is not our president now but he will be.
 
WTF?????!!!! So now you're saying Pedodent biden is NOT encouraging them to live here by giving them IDs!??? You have the IQ of a card table.

By the time they are given IDs they have started a process that lets them stay in the country legally until the process decides if they can stay or not. An official act does not violate the law you cited.

I suppose since a card table is smarter than you are you think everyone smarter than you has the IQ of a card table.
 
WTF?????!!!! So now you're saying Pedodent biden is NOT encouraging them to live here by giving them IDs!??? You have the IQ of a card table.

By the time they are given IDs they have started a process that lets them stay in the country legally until the process decides if they can stay or not. An official act does not violate the law you cited.

I suppose since a card table is smarter than you are you think everyone smarter than you has the IQ of a card table.
 
Until their asylum request is rejected they are entitled to stay in the country by law. There is no need for a future attempt until the first attempt is denied and goes through any appeal process.
 
I guess you missed this part.

(B) Burden of proof
(i) In general
The burden of proof is on the applicant to establish that the applicant is a refugee, within the meaning of section 1101(a)(42)(A) of this title. To establish that the applicant is a refugee within the meaning of such section, the applicant must establish that race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion was or will be at least one central reason for persecuting the applicant.


(2) Termination of asylum
Asylum granted under subsection (b) does not convey a right to remain permanently in the United States, and may be terminated if the Attorney General determines that—



I have seen figures of up to a 95% rejection rate.

Their first act of entering the U.S, illegally, should disqualify them.

You appear to want these illegals to come by the tens of millions.

Perhaps 8 or 10 can be sent to your house to feed, educate, and provide medical care.

Will tomorrow be too soon?

I didn't miss any part. You don't seem to understand that the burden of proof is determined in court. That is one of the last parts of the process.

Termination of asylum can only occur if asylum was granted. Something you seem to have missed.

It seems you want to make it harder to track and get those in the system to court on time.

How it works: The details of the program and who would be enrolled in a pilot are not yet decided.

Generally, I.D. cards would be provided to migrants not in detention centers who illegally cross the U.S.-Mexico border or others without legal status going through the lengthy immigration or removal court processes.

The card would likely include a QR code that would provide the enrollee access to court information and documents via an app, the sources said. This could potentially lessen the mounting number of FOIA requests for information about immigration cases.

It would also allow unauthorized immigrants such as asylum seekers to prove — if stopped by authorities — they are already in the immigration system.

Ideally, it would also incentivize unauthorized immigrants to provide accurate information about their location and virtually check-in more often with law enforcement —rather than having to wait in line at a physical ICE office.
https://www.axios.com/2022/07/22/biden-id-cards-immigrants-undocumented-ice

It looks like the ID card will help to streamline the system that you claim kicks 95% out of the country. Why would you be opposed to that?
 
I did read the law. You should try it.
Applying for asylum is an official act. Once a person has applied for asylum they are subject to the process which means they are no longer illegally in the country. Unless Biden is personally going to Mexico and driving people across the border or personally telling them to enter the country he is not in violation of the law as written.
That asylum shit is clearly being abused. it needs to be rewritten.
 
Because IDs for illegals are a violation of section 1324. The govt is committing a crime by giving them IDs. Anyone caught here illegally should be deported immediately .

How does it violate section 1324 to give an immigrant an ID to make sure they make it to their ICE hearing? Your opposition to the ID would be more likely to violate 1324.
 
Back
Top