Levin: ‘This Is Tyranny,’ ‘A Dark Mark on the American Politca

It's been that way for decades, on both sides. Something I've tried to bring to light for years on this board only to be met with snide remarks, insults, and other bullshit........depending upon which party i'm blasting at the moment.

What's been "that way"? The growth of white supremacy in US politics? Sure, it's always been there along with the KKK, they simply evolved with the times. In a modern, electronic society, David Duke was smart enough to realize he had to adapt his ideology to fit. Most of their symbols remain the same while new ones emerge as hate groups grow.
 
All brainhwashed trash by someone you want to believe and follow despite his lies. Some personalities are attracted to conspiracy theories (possibly an excess of dopamine in brain). If you notice our JPP posters who believe in conspiracy theories believe them all. There is no evidence of a deep state, voter fraud, etc. but they believe in them anyway.

lol.

there's plenty of evidence.

did you see the tape of ray epps? he's a known fbi agent.
 
What's been "that way"? The growth of white supremacy in US politics? Sure, it's always been there along with the KKK, they simply evolved with the times. In a modern, electronic society, David Duke was smart enough to realize he had to adapt his ideology to fit. Most of their symbols remain the same while new ones emerge as hate groups grow.

no. he means deep state ops comprising most of "reality".
 
Many times they are for insanely high amounts, like $250 million.

but mostly the facts of the case influence whether a case is a nuisance case or not. Not the settlement amount.

you're dumb and focus on the wrong thing in nearly every instance of anything.
 
What's been "that way"? The growth of white supremacy in US politics? Sure, it's always been there along with the KKK, they simply evolved with the times. In a modern, electronic society, David Duke was smart enough to realize he had to adapt his ideology to fit. Most of their symbols remain the same while new ones emerge as hate groups grow.

you do like to deflect to the race card alot, don't you? are you going to go full on liberal now, or continue to pretend you're libertarian for awhile longer?
 
Congress has investigative powers and they are using them right now. I would like you to name a few people who would be witnesses for Trump, knowing that they would be sworn it, and the consequences of lying to Congress.

Abusing them for partisan chicanery is more like it. Everyone sees it, too.
 
there are no charges against trump. exoneration is not necessary.

pelosi shirked her duty to properly secure the capital building.

fbi's ray epps fomented any malfeasance that actually occurred.

About that..The leader of the "#StopTheSteal" thing was a woman and a teacher. I remember that much. Did it get away from her?
 
Levin on January 6 Committee: ‘This Is Tyranny,’ ‘A Dark Mark on the American Politcal System’

Levin described the committee’s investigation as a “sham” and declared it would “go down in history as a dark mark on the American political system.”

“There is no way we can get to the truth under this committee,” Levin outlined. “And what is the purpose of the hearing? The purpose of a hearing is not to present a Hollywood-produced show trial. The purpose of a hearing is to garner information. They say they had 1,000 witnesses and 140,000 documents. A thousand witnesses and 140,000 documents? In order to determine what? How to protect the Capitol building? A thousand witnesses, and yet they couldn’t call one more, Nancy Pelosi, to explain what she did or didn’t do. And more and more information is coming out about how incompetent and irresponsible Nancy Pelosi was — her failure to protect that building.”

“Now, this is a sham,” he continued. “This will go down in history as a dark mark on the American political system. You can’t see it now — the mob is in control, the mob runs the media; the propaganda is full-throated. You can’t see it now, but history has a way of sobering events. And we will see this one day as the outrageous attack on our system on the prior president, on scores of people that it truly is. It’s an abomination to the American system — not just of justice but our congressional and representative system.”

“This is tyranny,” Levin concluded. “You’re staring it in the face.”


https://www.breitbart.com/clips/202...-a-dark-mark-on-the-american-politcal-system/
Who can disagree with this except for the sociopaths? Even at an instinctual level I've known this circus isn't going anywhere.
 
you do like to deflect to the race card alot, don't you? are you going to go full on liberal now, or continue to pretend you're libertarian for awhile longer?

Your denial these group exist fits hand-in-hand with your association with these groups.

Let's not forget that you and I have been discussing your political leanings and hatred of the United States since before the 2020 election. You revealed the most after the election but before 1/6....a reason the FBI took an interest in your activities with the WSEs in Texas and across the country.

As for me, I abide by my oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Your propensity for killing Americans to get your way is abhorrent to me.
 
but mostly the facts of the case influence whether a case is a nuisance case or not. Not the settlement amount.

The amount someone sues for is not the "settlement amount". Nuisance suits will many times be for unreasonable amounts of money, and then settle for tiny amounts of money. It is a trick to make the tiny amounts of money seem reasonable.
 
The amount someone sues for is not the "settlement amount". Nuisance suits will many times be for unreasonable amounts of money, and then settle for tiny amounts of money. It is a trick to make the tiny amounts of money seem reasonable.

but the settlement amount is the settlement amount.
 
Your denial these group exist fits hand-in-hand with your association with these groups.

Let's not forget that you and I have been discussing your political leanings and hatred of the United States since before the 2020 election. You revealed the most after the election but before 1/6....a reason the FBI took an interest in your activities with the WSEs in Texas and across the country.

As for me, I abide by my oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Your propensity for killing Americans to get your way is abhorrent to me.
You sound like a leftist pretending to be a patriot. Who did you vote for in this last election?
 
Your denial these group exist fits hand-in-hand with your association with these groups.

Let's not forget that you and I have been discussing your political leanings and hatred of the United States since before the 2020 election. You revealed the most after the election but before 1/6....a reason the FBI took an interest in your activities with the WSEs in Texas and across the country.

As for me, I abide by my oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States of America. Your propensity for killing Americans to get your way is abhorrent to me.
You sound like a leftist pretending to be a patriot. Who did you vote for in this last election?
 
Levin keeps his job by stirring up shit in his blind followers. Rush Limbaugh did the same thing.

Obviously, by the posts here, it works.
 
but the settlement amount is the settlement amount.

The settlement amount for a nuisance must be small enough that it is less that it is less than the legal costs. Everyone has the inclination to fight out an unjust suit. The settlement has to be low enough that it convinces them to just let it go.

In this case, that would have to be very low, an "undisclosed token amount" low. We can argue whether a "token amount" is $1 or $100, but those two amounts of money are basically equal compared to $250 million. It was not $250 million.
 
The settlement amount for a nuisance must be small enough that it is less that it is less than the legal costs. Everyone has the inclination to fight out an unjust suit. The settlement has to be low enough that it convinces them to just let it go.

In this case, that would have to be very low, an "undisclosed token amount" low. We can argue whether a "token amount" is $1 or $100, but those two amounts of money are basically equal compared to $250 million. It was not $250 million.

your logic remains specious and retarded.
:tardthoughts:
:truestory:
 
Back
Top