January 6 INQUISITION ‘Is Violating the Constitution’

Truth Detector

Truth Detector

Well-known member
Contributor
The brilliant Mark Levin hit's the nail on the proverbial head. This inquisition is, indeed, illegitimate. It is unconstitutional. It is a political smear campaign intended to do one thing, prevent the man the Democrats and left hate and fear the most, from running again.

Mark Levin: January 6 Committee ‘Is Violating the Constitution’

There is so much going on, but certain things that need to be discussed that just aren’t. And I want to discuss with you tonight in the opening monologue here, the war against Donald Trump.

What war against Donald Trump, right? He’s a private citizen.

There is a plan that’s been laid out to try and destroy Donald Trump, even though he is a private citizen. Even though he’s a private citizen, the Democratic Party is out to destroy him. They fear that he might be a nominee again, and they don’t want him to have any clout within the Republican Party. Mitch McConnell is all for that as well.

What am I talking about? Well, you had a Manhattan DA who retired, who opened an investigation of the Trump Organization. The Manhattan DA who replaced him, a radical leftist, is still conducting an investigation of the Trump Organization.

You have an Attorney General in Albany, New York, who ran on trying to indict Donald Trump. She should have been disbarred, in my opinion, right there and then, but instead, she actually has the ear of a Judge, who has now ordered the Trump Organization and former President Trump to comply with her subpoenas, even though it’s quite obvious in this civil investigation that there is no attempt here to conduct justice. It’s all about trying to destroy Donald Trump. That’s the Democrat elected Attorney General in Albany of New York.

Then we have a Democrat-elected District Attorney in Georgia who is trying to make some kind of a case out of Donald Trump’s phone call with a Georgia official berating him for failing to hold up the Georgia law as President Trump saw it, and so they open an investigation there, too. So these are heavy Democrat districts. These are political elected prosecutors, these are people who have no intention of doing justice. In fact, their goal is to do injustice.

We have way too damn many prosecutors like that, many of them with the backing of George Soros, which is why in part, we have such a massive problem with crime and murder in this country.

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/202...ry-6-committee-is-violating-the-constitution/
 
Then we have a fourth investigation going on, the so-called January 6 Committee. The January 6 Committee, which is nothing more than a front Politburo-type committee set up by Nancy Pelosi loaded with the most radical leftist Democrats you can imagine, and two of the worst never Trumper reprobates that you can imagine.

There is not a single lawyer on that Committee staff, not a single representative on that Committee staff to raise any objections to what that Committee is doing. It’s very Stalinist in its makeup, and that Committee is leaking like a sieve. Cherry picking information, using texts, using e- mails, putting the information out to their favorite news organizations, CNN, The Hill newspaper, The New York Times, The Washington Post, we saw all of this with Russia collusion.

And the farce here is they claim they are investigating January 6.

Ladies and gentlemen, Congress has two responsibilities and only two. One to legislate; two, to appropriate. They have no authority whatsoever to conduct quote-unquote, “criminal investigations.” That’s a separation of powers issue. That’s what the executive branch does.

And yet, this Committee is undermining all protections that a criminal investigation would provide to witnesses, that would provide to other people by claiming that it is conducting an investigation under its legislative overview powers to consider legislation for next time. That’s a farce.

Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, Bennie Thompson, Adam Schiff. They’ve all said that they’re looking for criminal issues here to make a criminal referral to the Department of Justice. There is pressure being placed on the Attorney General of the United States who is highly partisan and political to issue some kind of charges against former President Trump and his closest associates.

So what this January 6 Committee is doing is violating the Constitution — violating the Constitution, and quite frankly so is the executive branch. You cannot have a committee of Congress under the cover of legislating, conducting a criminal investigation, where people’s due process rights, rights to challenge evidence and other rights are being absolutely destroyed while they are sending their names to the Justice Department to be charged for contempt of Congress for not responding to their subpoenas and their testimony. The whole thing is a horrific setup. It’s absolutely un-American for Democratic Party operations, where they criminalize politics.

Donald Trump has committed no offenses whatsoever. How do I know? Because he’s the most investigated man on the face of the Earth by all kinds of authorities.

We had a Special Counsel. He came up with nothing. That’s the truth. And then we have this Russia collusion where they tried to set him up and that’s how we got a Special Counsel. And now we know that Hillary Clinton was the invisible hand behind the entire damn thing.

So this January 6 Committee is leaking its operations and the way it’s conducting. It violates the liberty and due process rights of the individuals that they’re smearing and the Democratic Party is on a tear. That’s what’s going on.
 
Now, let’s remember a few other things about this 2020. What’s the biggest problem about the 2020 election? First of all, you had Mark Zuckerberg, one of the oligarchs, could be a Russian oligarch, if you ask me, but he’s an oligarch and as you know, he owns Facebook. He is worth billions and billions, he pours $417 million into the race. That is indisputable.

And what does he do with that money? He goes, particularly into heavy Democrat areas, gives out grants to these local officials in these election offices. And as a condition of getting these grants, this extra money, to hire more people and to have more machines and to do all the rest. They must comply with the demands of the Zuckerberg front organization, and those demands helped the Democratic Party in Democratic precincts, in particularly battleground states.

That’s dark money by a billionaire trying to buy the presidency.

Now, I’m thrilled to death that the January 6 Committee is looking into this. They’re not. There’s not a single Committee of Congress looking into this, because the Democrats control both bodies. Not a single Committee of Congress, looking into Marc Elias, and the Perkins Coie law firm that went all over the country, changing the election laws in violation of the Federal Constitution.

They had governors, they had Boards of Elections. They had State Court, State Supreme Courts. The problem is the Constitution says the State Legislature determines the election processes for choosing a President and a Vice President. And unfortunately, the United States Supreme Court, when two cases came to that court out of Pennsylvania, refused to take up either one.

In Pennsylvania, you had a Supreme Court that is rogue, every bit as rogue as the Florida Supreme Court was in 2000. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court changed the election laws to help Biden and the Democrats in the Democratic areas. When the Florida Supreme Court kept changing how you count ballots in Florida, finally, the U.S. Supreme Court under the great leadership of Chief Justice William Rehnquist stepped in and said, “That’s enough.” You don’t have the authority to do that. That’s enough.

The John Roberts Supreme Court refused to step in at all, and that’s why we’re in this mess we’re in today, if you ask me. I hope when the Republicans take control the House of Representatives that they do to Nancy Pelosi, and these Democrats on this Committee, and these two rogue Republicans on this Committee what they’ve done to everybody else, that they look at their text messages, that they go after their e-mails, that they go after their phone logs behind their backs, going to the phone companies, going to the software companies to gather the information so it cannot be challenged.

And if they don’t turn the information over that the Committee wants under Republican control, then they are held in contempt by Congress, and their names are sent to the District Courts in Washington, D.C. to have an official criminal decision against them.

Now, why do we need their text messages and e-mails? Just to be mad? No. We need it because this Committee was set up ostensibly to look into what happened on January 6.

They haven’t asked for a single piece of information from Nancy Pelosi. What did she do to protect the Capitol grounds? What information did she get from the FBI or any other organization? What did she tell the Capitol Police to do?

Was she asked if she wanted 10,000 to 20,000 National Guardsmen? She needs to testify under oath. We need to see her texts. Why the other Members of Congress? Because these other Members of Congress are using the January 6 Committee, not to investigate how to protect the Capitol, not to investigate what happened that day. They’re using your tax dollars. They’re using the official position of Committee members under this rogue committee to advance a political agenda against the former President, against his former staff, and against his family members, and it is time to put an end to this.
 
BidenPresident said:
Shame on the US for having assholes like Truth Detector as citizens.
Click to expand...

You misspelled "BidenPresident" asswhipe. As usual, you are incapable of coherent honest debate, and instead, troll the thread with your manic stupidity.

Now run along and take your meds mental case. :palm:
 
Spot on.

Mark Levin: Jan 6 Committee's 'evidence' of Trump's 'criminal conduct' ends up proving just the opposite

During a recent hearing, Vice Chairman Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) read aloud several text messages among former President Trump’s chief of staff Mark Meadows, various members of Congress, the press, and the president's son, Donald Trump Jr. that were sent and received on Jan. 6.

"These texts leave no doubt: the White House knew exactly what was happening at the Capitol. Members of Congress, the press, and others wrote to Mark Meadows as the attack was underway," Cheney alleged before reading the text messages.

“Mr. Meadows’s testimony will bear on another key question before this committee: Did Donald Trump, through action or inaction, corruptly seek to obstruct or impede Congress’ official proceeding to count electoral votes?” she added.

"Now let me ask you a question: What does that demonstrate?"

"It proves the case against their own narrative. If Donald Trump were leading an insurrection, don't you think Don Jr. would be in on it? If Donald Trump were leading an insurrection, don't you think some of his friends in the media would know about it rather than telling him ... to do something about this? It wouldn't be the other way around."

"That's the point. If you had somebody with a 4 IQ there, they'd have said, 'Wait a minute, if Don Jr is pleading with his dad to say something (in response to the riot), then obviously Don Jr. didn't know about it in advance, or these Fox hosts didn't know about it in advance, nor did the president, nor did his chief of staff.' Right? Because they would have talked to their friends and their compatriots,"

https://www.theblaze.com/shows/levintv/mark-levin-jan-6-committee?rebelltitem=1#rebelltitem1
 
IMO, the one absolute greatest thing that Trump ever did was embarrass the everloving shit out of the entire party of democrats and the entire base of the left by actually winning in 2016, when every single one of you idiot leftists said 'there won't be a president trump'

other than that particular thing, he was just like every other republican and democrat.........shitty as hell.
 
Pretty funny, it is unConstitutional because Mark Levin, basically a nobody Fox and AM radio gave a microphone to, says “it is a plan to get Trump”

It’s just too funny how wingers as “copy” swallows everything and anything anyone tells them cause they want to believe it is true
 
SmarterthanYou said:
IMO, the one absolute greatest thing that Trump ever did was embarrass the everloving shit out of the entire party of democrats and the entire base of the left by actually winning in 2016, when every single one of you idiot leftists said 'there won't be a president trump'

other than that particular thing, he was just like every other republican and democrat.........shitty as hell.
Click to expand...

Trump became President, true. Only President impeached twice. Only President who tried to take over the government with violence.
 
Mark Levin: ‘Nothing’ Learned from January 6 Committee — ‘This Isn’t a Pursuit of the Truth’

It’s funny. They say Trump didn’t respond quickly enough on January 6, but he did respond on January 6, and here we have the access of evil — Biden, Schumer and Pelosi — who still haven’t responded to an assassination plot against the Supreme Court justice. With their violent rhetoric, they still haven’t responded to the threats that are coming down the potential need of the national guard to protect the Supreme Court.

The left is extraordinarily violent, whether it’s the summer of 2020, whether it was the riots during the inauguration of Donald Trump to try and prevent his being swear in to be president, whether it was the attack on the second branch of government, the executive branch at the White House and injured Secret Service agents.

But this committee made up of seven leftists and two disgruntled Never Trumpers, nine reprobates, obviously doesn’t care about that. That’s what I want to talk about.

We don’t have a system like this in America where we trust people so much that they don’t get challenged. What’s happening, the first time today I watched minutes of this hearing and I was disgusted.

It’s all choreographed they have teleprompters. They splice in their video. It’s all cherry picked. No contrary witnesses, no contrary evidence, no cross-examination, no opposition, no motions, no challenges. And we’re supposed to believe this.

And the media sit there on their thumbs and talk about — oh, we had big information today and the legal analyst, same thing. Well, we learned a lot today.

You learn nothing. This isn’t a pursuit of the truth, and I’ll give you two perfect simple examples. I was told from a high-ranking person in the — in the Mike Pence circles, they said Michael Luttig, who was their chief witness today, who sounded like Robbie — frankly like Robert Mueller, he said they never asked Luttig for an opinion. Luttig was not an advisor to Pence. Luttig was not counsel to Pence.

They tell me anyway, Luttig never spoke to Pence. I’m told he volunteered, quote, unquote, his analysis by submitting it unsolicited to the vice president’s office. You didn’t get any of that today and yet if there is somebody to question Luttig, maybe we would have learned about that.

I’ll give you another one. Bill Barr now is being celebrated. Remember they hated him. They wanted to impeach him. They wanted to hang him from a telephone pole like Mussolini.

Now, they love him because he’s useful. Well, I have a letter here. It’s public, from former U.S. attorney of Philadelphia, William McSwain, June 2021. He says in part on Election Day and afterwards our office received various allegations of voter fraud and election irregularities. This is the U.S. attorney in Philly.

As part of my responsibility as a U.S. attorney, I wanted to be transparent with the public and, of course, investigate fully any allegations. Attorney General Barr however instructed me not to make any public statements or put without any press releases regarding possible election irregularities. I was also given a directive to pass along serious allegations to the state attorney general for investigation, the same state attorney general who had already declared that you could not win. I disagreed with that decision but those were my orders, quote/unquote.

Wouldn’t it be nice when Barr was testimony that somebody was there to challenge Barr, somebody there was to challenge Luttig? We have professors on the left who actually agreed with John Eastman’s position before it was John Eastman’s position and Trump’s position. The fact of the matter is when it comes to state legislatures, of course, you can lobby state legislatures to change the electoral outcome in the state of Pennsylvania, which none of them want to talk about.

The governor, the secretary of state, the elected Democrat majority Supreme Court changed the election laws right up to the first few days before the election that violated Article II of the federal Constitution because the legislature was Republican and wouldn’t make those changes. They talk about there’s 60 lawsuits and judges said no.

The final say is with the state legislature, not with judges. Not with judges. Donald Trump — whatever you think about the advice and all the rest — had every right to ask state legislatures to look into this. It is not clear, hello, it is not clear under the United States Constitution, it is not clear under the 12th Amendment, what the responsibilities of the vice president United States are and how they are limited.

So to not have an opposition, to not have a legal challenge right there in the committee, to not challenge these witnesses, this is a railroad job, pure and simple. And it’s time the media get off its ass and pay attention and the legal analysts act like real lawyers. That’s it.

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/202...6-committee-this-isnt-a-pursuit-of-the-truth/
 
SmarterthanYou said:
IMO, the one absolute greatest thing that Trump ever did was embarrass the everloving shit out of the entire party of democrats and the entire base of the left by actually winning in 2016, when every single one of you idiot leftists said 'there won't be a president trump'
Click to expand...

He did much more than that. He exposed the PHONY media for the partisan hypocrites and liars they are. He exposed the true agenda of the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses and the Marxist beliefs they have.

But this isn't about Trump. It's about the January 6th Inquisition and its unconstitutionality. ;)

SmarterthanYou said:
other than that particular thing, he was just like every other republican and democrat.........shitty as hell.
Click to expand...

What parts were "shitty?"
 
Levin: We’ve Learned ‘Nothing’ from ‘Illegitimate’ January 6 Committee Hearings

“What did we learn in this hearing? We learned that this hearing is illegitimate,” Levin outlined. “This January 6 hearing was not only illegitimate before because of all of the reasons that I have talked about in the past — lack of opposition, exculpatory evidence, cross-examination, and on and on and on, but because Congress is not supposed to be doing this.”

He added, “What did we learn? Eight hearings, public hearings, and this eighth hearing — we’ve learned nothing. Nothing. Nothing we didn’t already know. Oh, there’s some little things here and there. Oh, you know, what? That is not exactly correct. These hearings have confirmed — ready? That Donald Trump had no direct role whatsoever in the January 6 violence inside the Capitol building. None whatsoever. Now, how do we know that? Because they have not presented any. They’ve had videos. They’ve had texts. They’ve had graphics. They’ve had emails. They’ve had documents. They’ve had witnesses. Do you remember one sentence where Donald Trump directed or ordered, or even encouraged a violent attack? Not innuendo. Not opinion. Not inference. But any actual fact? No, you haven’t found any because there isn’t any.”

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/202...om-illegitimate-january-6-committee-hearings/
 
Truth Detector said:
Partisan impeachments are useless prattle. Only dullards, dimwits and liars believe they had any meaning. :palm:



More lie filled bullshit. I don't think you can post without lying or looking stupid. :palm:
Click to expand...

I find it ironic that people like you who keep saying you are constitutionalists have never read the Constitution, at least without understanding it.

Impeachment is explained in the Constitution as an act of the House of Representative. Since the House elects a Speaker based on majority control, it is necessarily partisan.
 
Truth Detector said:
He did much more than that. He exposed the PHONY media for the partisan hypocrites and liars they are. He exposed the true agenda of the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses and the Marxist beliefs they have.
Click to expand...

I find it difficult to believe that he 'exposed' them when everybody already knew that. even the libs knew it, they just willfully ignored it because it served their own interests.

Truth Detector said:
What parts were "shitty?"
Click to expand...
Reagan stupidly fell victim to the establishment, became the establishment, when he signed FOPA with the belief that the SCOTUS would find the hughes amendment unconstitutional
Bush 1 criminally stood up for a marshals service and FBI agents who murdered innocent people at ruby ridge, and 'no new taxes'..........
Clinton and Reno murdered 58 men, women, and children and then used his typical wordsmithing to claim that no law or right was violated by the federal government in doing so, when we all know it was.
Bush 2............wanted to be known as a 'war' president, so he let the neocons in the establishment pursue a practical negation of the Constitution with the PATRIOT ACT by fear mongering most of the population in to a panicked terror so they would accept being 'safe'
Obama.......nuff said
Trump.........get the guns first, due process second
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top