they've already done it once......
Not Trump. He was still in office when impeached the second time.
they've already done it once......
Not Trump. He was still in office when impeached the second time.
Not Trump. He was still in office when impeached the second time.
and he was in office during his "coups"
kind of redundant.
So Hillary violated the law and should have been prosecuted. Got it.
don't look stupid and pretend a handful of days makes a difference......
Comey is a lying hack. No surprise you believe what he tells you. Question; is it legal to conduct Government business on private phones and email servers? Yes or no.
What are the reasons someone would conduct Federal business with a personal phone and email server?
What are the reasons one would destroy their personal phone and email server records?
https://lawandcrime.com/politics/hi...l-records-act-heres-why-she-cant-be-punished/
Who has authority over the Capital police if not the House of Representatives? Dunce.![]()
That is what I have always said. Deflecting from the January 6 riot by talking about Hillary or the BLM riots is irrelevant. If Hillary or Ivanka violated the law they should be prosecuted, but the authorities chose not to do so just as they have not charged Trump with anything.

I didn't say I believed him. However, neither of us has any information to prove him wrong. He clearly explained he did now want to interfere in a presidential election.
If you think what Hillary did was serious enough to "lock her up" you must really want to imprison Trump for his failure to uphold his oath to the Constitution.

In other words, you made no effort to find the answer to this question. Why not the Senate? It is neither. As usual, you quote right-wing sources with no effort to check the accuracy.

No one but you is deflecting. Now stop fapping and move along.![]()
So you have no idea what you are fapping about or who has authority over the Capitol police. Just say so dipshit.![]()
There will be no criminal indictments and November will be harsh on the morons in the Party of the Jackass and its defenders. Better stock up in your meds mental case.![]()
The difference is being president of the United States and no longer being president. If you don't think that is an important difference you aren't being honest.
lol.....look at the demmycunt, pretending he gives a fuck about honesty......
How would garbage like you know whether or not there will be criminal indictments?
lol.....look at the demmycunt, pretending he gives a fuck about honesty......
You are a pure hate troll.
Not knowing the difference between being president on January 23 and no longer being president on January 20 is not an issue of honesty but simple common sense. You can't see a difference--that tells us something.