Trump must be prosecuted

[BidenPresident]

What criminal statutes does all this conduct violate? Try 18 U.S.C. Section 1512(c), which applies to anyone who “corruptly … obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so.” Try 18 U.S.C. Section 371 which prohibits conspiracy “to defraud the United States”; such defrauding includes efforts to obstruct “the lawful functions of any department of Government.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/15/prosecute-trump-garland-case/

 

[BidenPresident]

The Justice Department’s “Principles of Federal Prosecution” offer some guidance here. Two sentences in particular stand out:

“If a person … is reasonably believed to have engaged in criminal activity at an earlier time, this should be considered in determining whether to commence or recommend federal prosecution.” Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III identified 10 instances in which Trump might have obstructed justice in connection with the Russia probe; Mueller didn’t proceed because Trump, as a sitting president, was shielded from indictment under Justice Department practice.

 

[BidenPresident]

“The fact that the accused occupied a position of trust or responsibility which he/she violated in committing the offense, might weigh in favor of prosecution.” There is no greater position of trust or responsibility than the presidency, and no one who so flagrantly and repeatedly abused that trust more than Trump.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/15/prosecute-trump-garland-case/

 

[Stone]

 

[Lightbringer]

What criminal statutes does all this conduct violate? Try 18 U.S.C. Section 1512(c), which applies to anyone who “corruptly … obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so.” Try 18 U.S.C. Section 371 which prohibits conspiracy “to defraud the United States”; such defrauding includes efforts to obstruct “the lawful functions of any department of Government.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/15/prosecute-trump-garland-case/

Fuck Joe Biden.

 

[gemini104104]

What criminal statutes does all this conduct violate? Try 18 U.S.C. Section 1512(c), which applies to anyone who “corruptly … obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so.” Try 18 U.S.C. Section 371 which prohibits conspiracy “to defraud the United States”; such defrauding includes efforts to obstruct “the lawful functions of any department of Government.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/15/prosecute-trump-garland-case/

Considering the devil has already been prosecuted by the blood of Christ, tRump as a slave of the devil should be no exception to the ultimate judgement of the Almighty God.

 

[Lightbringer]

Considering the devil has already been prosecuted by the blood of Christ, tRump as a slave of the devil should be no exception to the ultimate judgement of the Almighty God.

You're an idiot.

 

[martin]

Indict him and deny bail as a flight risk - he would have an open invitation from Russia, North Korea or about any anti-democratic nation. He could campaign by television from the Kremlin.

 

[Earl]

Indict him and deny bail as a flight risk - he would have an open invitation from Russia, North Korea or about any anti-democratic nation.

Horse mierda, Marty.

Get a clue.

Trump, Trump, Trump...your next president.

 

[PostmodernProphet]

What criminal statutes does all this conduct violate? Try 18 U.S.C. Section 1512(c), which applies to anyone who “corruptly … obstructs, influences, or impedes any official proceeding, or attempts to do so.” Try 18 U.S.C. Section 371 which prohibits conspiracy “to defraud the United States”; such defrauding includes efforts to obstruct “the lawful functions of any department of Government.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2022/07/15/prosecute-trump-garland-case/

who did he conspire with?.......so far there has been no evidence that he even communicated with anyone.......

 

[PostmodernProphet]

The Justice Department’s “Principles of Federal Prosecution” offer some guidance here. Two sentences in particular stand out:

“If a person … is reasonably believed to have engaged in criminal activity at an earlier time, this should be considered in determining whether to commence or recommend federal prosecution.” Special counsel Robert S. Mueller III identified 10 instances in which Trump might have obstructed justice in connection with the Russia probe; Mueller didn’t proceed because Trump, as a sitting president, was shielded from indictment under Justice Department practice.

you do realize that you had people looking into those ten "instances in which Trump might have" for years and they found absolutely nothing, right?......