Wasn't the Secret Service guy supposed to refute Hutchinson?

She absolutely did violate the law. There was evidence of that. The problem is that douchebags in the Democratic Party and the media don't care when a Democrat actually breaks the laws.

So tell me, what crimes did Trump commit and why is that after more than 540 days we don't see any referrals or charges? Comeon man! Tell us!
:laugh:

Then why didn't the prosecute her, Trump said he would lock her up (another campaign promise he let go)? Why havent they made a referral on her? COMEON man! tell me!
 
the report of another person's words by a witness, which is usually disallowed as evidence in a court of law.

Well this isn't a court of law, it's a hearing to determine facts.

So move that bar again.


"everything they had told him would have been ruled out as hearsay"

NOPE. Wrong-o-boyo.

It's not hearsay to repeat something someone else told you...what they told you might be hearsay, but it's not hearsay to repeat it.

For instance, it's hearsay to say "a source close to the Secret Service said the officer is willing to refute Hutchinson". THAT is hearsay.

Hutchinson saying someone else told her Trump tried to take the wheel ISN'T HEARSAY. Someone else telling her Trump tried to take the wheel MIGHT be hearsay, but Hutchinson repeating it is not.
 
Well this isn't a court of law, it's a hearing to determine facts.

So move that bar again.




NOPE. Wrong-o-boyo.

It's not hearsay to repeat something someone else told you...what they told you might be hearsay, but it's not hearsay to repeat it.

For instance, it's hearsay to say "a source close to the Secret Service said the officer is willing to refute Hutchinson". THAT is hearsay.

Hutchinson saying someone else told her Trump tried to take the wheel ISN'T HEARSAY.

it most definitely is hearsay regarding trumps actions.

You're a retarded imbecile.
 
The secret service doesn't typically make public statements about Presidents.

Ah, so then why do you believe the Tweet that "a source close to the secret service says" that the officer is willing to refute what she said?

Now proceed with your stolen memes and hysterical crying about everything that you usually do when you paint yourself into a rhetorical corner.
 
How so? An inquisition of whom? And to what end?

An inquisition against Trump, stop being a dishonest lying hack for once in you pathetic existence. You've been told that by Nancy herself dishonest twat. To prevent Trump from ever running again. Yes, the Party of the Jackass is that scared of him. You would think that after the Steele Dossier HOAX, the Russia Collusion HOAX, the Mueller HOAX, the Ukraine impeachment HOAX and the previous January 6th impeachment HOAX Democrats would get a clue and move on.

But like you, they lack the good common sense and intelligence to do what anyone normal human being would do. This is why I would love another chance to elect Trump again. Watch those morons heads explode.
:laugh:

Nancy Pelosi didn't invite Nazis to the Capitol in December twice and then again in January.

Do you really think calling everyone you disagree with Nazi's makes your arguments look less stupid?

She runs the House. She oversees security. We now know that she, Trump, Schumer and the mayor had intelligence suggesting that some bad players might be part of the gathering. When offered National Guard troops, they said no. They didn't like the optics.

So yes, we need to know why there was only a hand full of capital police there that day when the group of oath keepers approached, while I might add, the Trump supporters were still listening o Trumps speech.


We know exactly why it happened; Trump lost the election and lied about there being voter fraud.

That isn't what happened that day. See, this is why it's hard to have a conversation with an uneducated, dishonesty mental case. :palm:

You spread those lies here on JPP for two months, but then chickened out on 1/6 and hid out here to shitpost instead.

You're going to need to flail harder scarecrow. Your strawmen are crashing down. :palm:

So either you didn't believe the shit you were saying, or you're no patriot at all.

More projecting. I think you should take your meds and retire to that padded cell for now. You're not making sense as usual. ;)
 
That's the perfect example of how relevant Hutchinsion is. You're going to need to flail harder scarecrow. Your arguments are weak sauce. ;)

A source close to JPP says that your mom is willing to testify under oath that you live in her basement and that she masturbates you to bed every night.
 
Comey said she didn't.
There you go again, running your big mouth.

Comey is a corrupt hack. He should be in shackles as well for peddling the fake Hillary created dossier. But yes, Hillary most certainly committed violations and crimes. You, being the uneducated, dishonest mental case, we know you to be, are too stupid to comprehend the obvious. ;)
 
Then why didn't the prosecute her, Trump said he would lock her up (another campaign promise he let go)? Why havent they made a referral on her? COMEON man! tell me!

Why are you asking me questions that you already know the answer to? Obama was president. Do you think he gave a shit? But I get why you are deflecting and flailing, it's hard to defend lies and false narratives.

So you still haven't told me, what crimes did Trump commit and why is that after more than 540 days we don't see any referrals or charges? Comeon man! Tell us!
;)
 
Back
Top