Poor Trumppers!

Its like any social media there are racists, they had Trump forever, until he tried to take over our government.

I chose who is on my feed, and its not racists. Twitter is very much what you chose it to be.

So this is who's on your feed, huh? :laugh:

btdm63hi48s11.png
 
Last edited:
Twitter has lost all credibility . it's like maybe 50% bots . The best part is Musk doesnt have to buy that corrupt beast, but he's blown open how terrible the algorithms are
And how ridiculous biased management is.
Trump will never go back. It's for the libs and elitists, blue check mark Karens
 
Elon Musk pulls out of Twitter deal, they got fooled again!


Trump may not get back on Twitter... He pulled a head fake on you.

tRump did indicate stupid people like him at being easy to manipulate, and at feeding them with all that hate and treason they love.
 
Twitter has lost all credibility . it's like maybe 50% bots . The best part is Musk doesnt have to buy that corrupt beast, but he's blown open how terrible the algorithms are
And how ridiculous biased management is.
Trump will never go back. It's for the libs and elitists, blue check mark Karens

Really? MTG and Boebert are Karens? BTW Boebert just made a threat against President Biden on Twitter.
 
Really? MTG and Boebert are Karens? BTW Boebert just made a threat against President Biden on Twitter.
She was mocking president Joe Biden, who mistakenly said “presidency” instead of “pregnancy” last week when referring to abortion rights.

“Ten years old and she was forced to travel out of the state to Indiana to seek to terminate the presidency and maybe save her life,” the president said on 8 July, referring to the case of a child who was allegedly forced to travel from Ohio to Indiana for an abortion.
 
She was mocking president Joe Biden, who mistakenly said “presidency” instead of “pregnancy” last week when referring to abortion rights.

“Ten years old and she was forced to travel out of the state to Indiana to seek to terminate the presidency and maybe save her life,” the president said on 8 July, referring to the case of a child who was allegedly forced to travel from Ohio to Indiana for an abortion.

Well even then it was a bad take. Her tweet has been reported to the FBI.

 
Hello cawacko,

Haha. There’s so much going on here. For starters is Musk really walking away or is this just a negotiating tactic as with the slowing economy and drop in stock price the firm is not worth near what he has proposed to pay. Will the Board sue to force Musk to go through with the sale?

Separately, Twitter is an absolute cesspool. Yes there are certain benefits to it but on the whole it’s a net negative to society. Depending on who you ask it’s also a very racist and unwelcoming place. So ironic folks say they will leave Twitter if Musk buys it but are willing to stay on it otherwise.

Social media obviously requires far more active and stringent regulation. Perhaps a public corporation such as CPB should run it.

Social media does not appear to be a good institution to be run for profit.

All they are doing is promoting the most salacious participation in a plainly obvious effort to generate participation. All that does is encourage shock factor to flood the system with brainless teen age garbage. High quality participation is then diminished.

Capitalism trashes social media up.
 
Welcome to JPP, Theywillneverlearn!.

That is all the left seems to do. Make up shit.

Sounds pretty prejudiced.

I am liberal. I try to be a truthful and accurate as possible. And polite.

btw, I notice from your posting history you have a lot of negative things to say about liberals. If you go off on me like that, I just won't talk to you. At all. And it will be permanent.

But just to be fair, I am giving you the same chance to be civil that I give everyone. Can you conduct a polite conversation as if you're talking to a friend who just happens to disagree with you?

I am willing to talk openly to anyone as long as it is mutually respectful. But funny thing. There is not a single Trump supporter in here who can conduct a pleasant conversation. They all seem to be so angry and full of hatred and vitriol. It is as if they are just looking for someone to dump all of their frustration on. When they encounter a liberal, they can't resist blaming that person for everything they see wrong with the country. Somebody they don't even know. Doesn't matter. And it never ceases.

Why are the Trump supporters in here so angry and mean-natured? That doesn't represent well.

I don't have vitriol IRL (it's great!) and I don't want that out of a political discussion forum. I give everyone a chance to be nice, but if they aren't then I cut them off. Are you the exception? Can you actually talk one on one with someone who promises to be respectful to you? I have a reputation around here of not insulting anyone. You can count on me. I am not going to call you names or downtalk you. You can trust me and just really talk. Or you can go with the big front and unload on me. Your choice.

But I do want to caution you. If you go off on me, better make it good. You'll only get one chance. As soon as I detect that, I will stop reading and place you on Ignore.

Your call.

Same old, same old? Or are you curious enough about liberals to actually talk to one as a friend.

We could be friends if you like. Do you have a liberal friends IRL? I've got lots of conservative friends myself. Trump supporters included. They are great friends. We have good times together. They don't go off on me IRL. I often wonder if some of the people I have on Ignore are actually real life friends of mine. Probably not, but who knows?

Anyway, I will wish you well either way. No hatred. Just disagreement.
 
Welcome to JPP, Theywillneverlearn!.



Sounds pretty prejudiced.

I am liberal. I try to be a truthful and accurate as possible. And polite.

btw, I notice from your posting history you have a lot of negative things to say about liberals. If you go off on me like that, I just won't talk to you. At all. And it will be permanent.

But just to be fair, I am giving you the same chance to be civil that I give everyone. Can you conduct a polite conversation as if you're talking to a friend who just happens to disagree with you?

I am willing to talk openly to anyone as long as it is mutually respectful. But funny thing. There is not a single Trump supporter in here who can conduct a pleasant conversation. They all seem to be so angry and full of hatred and vitriol. It is as if they are just looking for someone to dump all of their frustration on. When they encounter a liberal, they can't resist blaming that person for everything they see wrong with the country. Somebody they don't even know. Doesn't matter. And it never ceases.

Why are the Trump supporters in here so angry and mean-natured? That doesn't represent well.

I don't have vitriol IRL (it's great!) and I don't want that out of a political discussion forum. I give everyone a chance to be nice, but if they aren't then I cut them off. Are you the exception? Can you actually talk one on one with someone who promises to be respectful to you? I have a reputation around here of not insulting anyone. You can count on me. I am not going to call you names or downtalk you. You can trust me and just really talk. Or you can go with the big front and unload on me. Your choice.

But I do want to caution you. If you go off on me, better make it good. You'll only get one chance. As soon as I detect that, I will stop reading and place you on Ignore.

Your call.

Same old, same old? Or are you curious enough about liberals to actually talk to one as a friend.

We could be friends if you like. Do you have a liberal friends IRL? I've got lots of conservative friends myself. Trump supporters included. They are great friends. We have good times together. They don't go off on me IRL. I often wonder if some of the people I have on Ignore are actually real life friends of mine. Probably not, but who knows?

Anyway, I will wish you well either way. No hatred. Just disagreement.

BoloxTalker never changes!
 
Hello cawacko,



Social media obviously requires far more active and stringent regulation. Perhaps a public corporation such as CPB should run it.

Social media does not appear to be a good institution to be run for profit.

All they are doing is promoting the most salacious participation in a plainly obvious effort to generate participation. All that does is encourage shock factor to flood the system with brainless teen age garbage. High quality participation is then diminished.

Capitalism trashes social media up.

Should the entrepreneurial unit of the government have created all the various social media sites we use like Facebook, Twitter etc.?

How would the gov't run them differently? What would their business model be to sustain these sites?
 
Hello cawacko,

Should the entrepreneurial unit of the government have created all the various social media sites we use like Facebook, Twitter etc.?

How would the gov't run them differently? What would their business model be to sustain these sites?

I said a public corporation, not government.

The difference should be that garbage posts and vitriol are discouraged.

As for the business model, match it to what CPB does.
 
Hello cawacko,



I said a public corporation, not government.

The difference should be that garbage posts and vitriol are discouraged.

As for the business model, match it to what CPB does.

Twitter doesn't openly encourage garbage posts now yet the place is a cesspool. What is this public corporation going to do differently? (Twitter is a public corporation, what am I missing here?)

What is the CPB?
 
Back
Top