Why Trump should be charged with rebellion or insurrection

Nomad

Nomad

Every trumper is a N4T.
From Business Insider:

Watergate prosecutor says slapping Trump with a charge of rebellion or insurrection could prevent him from ever holding office again

Jill Wine-Banks, a Watergate prosecutor, said charging former President Donald Trump with rebellion or insurrection would prevent him from holding political office again.

During an MSNBC appearance on Friday, Wine-Banks was asked whether she thought Trump would at least be indicted for obstruction of justice. She suggested that one of the "best" crimes to indict the former president of would be rebellion or insurrection, an offense under Title 18 of the US Code, Section 2383.

"I think it would be horrible not to act on what is now blatantly obvious to anyone who has watched the hearings," Wine-Banks said.

She noted that unlike a seditious conspiracy charge, a rebellion or insurrection charge would see the convicted offender barred from "ever holding federal office again."

Wine-Banks called the penalty a "more important goal than jailing the former president."

She added that Trump could face several other charges based on the testimonies presented at the January 6 hearings.

"There is, of course, obstruction of Congress, obstruction of justice, witness tampering, so many things just based on Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony," Wine-Banks said.

In April, Wine-Banks said she believed Trump's potentially criminal actions on January 6,2021, could be "incalculably worse" than those of former President Richard Nixon.

She has also joined figures like former White House chief of staff Mick Mulvaney in commenting on criminal charges Trump could face. Mulvaney, for one, has claimed that the January 6 panel may have evidence that could lead to Trump being hit with obstruction of justice charges.

https://www.businessinsider.com/wat...com&utm_campaign=sf-bi-main&utm_medium=social
Click to expand...

Keeping this dangerous lunatic away from the WH should be the main focus, rather than just punishment or revenge.
 
Nomad said:
From Business Insider:



Keeping this dangerous lunatic away from the WH should be the main focus, rather than just punishment or revenge.
Click to expand...

How about just running a better candidate and beat him? Keep him out that way. ????
 
leaningright said:
How about just running a better candidate and beat him? Keep him out that way. ????
Click to expand...

Trump is a con artist who made chumps out of half the voters once.

He could do it again.

Never underestimate human stupidity or overestimate their intelligence.

Trump is living proof of that.
 
leaningright said:
How about just running a better candidate and beat him? Keep him out that way. ????
Click to expand...

Valid point, however as we have seen, that exact thing happened in 2020 and yet a third of the nation, a political party, and major news network wouldn’t admit it, so you should see there is more happening here than just the best candidate wins
 
So the Hell with the law?

Now the far left want to charge and convict Trump just so he cannot run again.

:rolleyes:


Every POTUS breaks the law.
Both sides.
Even the left's beloved Obama did by ordering the murder of an American citizen without trial.

https://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/assassinations_2/

And I bet you EVERY POTUS would do whatever it took to get a second term.
Even breaking the law.

The only difference with Trump was he was too simple/stupid to do it subtly.
 
McRocket said:
So the Hell with the law?

Now the far left want to charge and convict Trump just so he cannot run again.

:rolleyes:


Every POTUS breaks the law.
Both sides.
Even the left's beloved Obama did by ordering the murder of an American citizen without trial.

https://www.salon.com/2010/04/07/assassinations_2/

And I bet you EVERY POTUS would do whatever it took to get a second term.
Even breaking the law.

The only difference with Trump was he was too simple/stupid to do it subtly.
Click to expand...

You lie like shit in the grass.
 
leaningright said:
How about just running a better candidate and beat him? Keep him out that way. ????
Click to expand...

They didn't need to, they ran a basement dwelling dementia patient, and it worked.

Brandon is the happiest man alive, every morning he wakes up and he gets to find out he is pResident of the United States.
 
leaningright said:
There’s got to be a reason for that.
Click to expand...

Lots of reasons, good marketing on the part of the lesser choice, angry illogical sentiment from a group of voters, small states getting more say than larger ones, uneducated voters... I could come up with a lot of them.
 
Damocles said:
They didn't need to, they ran a basement dwelling dementia patient, and it worked.

Brandon is the happiest man alive, every morning he wakes up and he gets to find out he is pResident of the United States.
Click to expand...

Sadly, Biden was the better choice.
 
Jarod said:
Sadly, Biden was the better choice.
Click to expand...

I disagree. The better option was female, and running on a different party. I voted for them. Unfortunately some stupid people think there are "only two" options. You would be one of the ones saying something stupid on the Simpson's... "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top