Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
Your statement was contested to begin with because of your thread being about an international order that the Resident referenced.
Seriously, get better at this shit.
Liberal international order
- Thread starter AProudLefty
- Start date
Your statement was contested to begin with because of your thread being about an international order that the Resident referenced.
Seriously, get better at this shit.
He didn't. His adviser did.
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
They both did. You lose.
Okay post a video of Biden saying that.
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
This is your thread, how many videos did you post? Should I post a video about Japan being relevant to NATO? That's something you brought up. Your stupid shit has been considered and is dismissed.
I still don't know what your beef is. I created a thread explaining what "Liberal World Order" is because people have been asking about it and you screeched like a stinky yak in heat.
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
Dude, you referenced post #22 where you said, and were quoted saying, you didn't understand. You tried to play that off as you answering a question. You lose. Fuck off.
moon
Satire for Sanity
Correct. I didn't understand the point of your question. What were you expecting me to say?
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
We are done. You lose.
Well, mostly because I have to get my trailer loaded soon but you still lose.
Okay say hello to Randy Hickey for me.
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
Props for the Randy Hickey call out.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
excellent.
Monad Portal
Was it me?
internationalist flowery language is just how they sell technocratic totalitarianism.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
I hadn't heard this term until yesterday.......is this what we used to call the New World Order?.......or is it just what we used to call globalization.......hopefully someone from what we used to call the Democratic Party can explain........
New World Order is the unigovernment type thing- totalitarian world government
this is like "Rules based world order"
https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/rules-based-order-whats-in-a-name
In its communique, leaders of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO) reaffirmed their commitment to the RBO and asserted that “China’s stated ambitions and assertive behaviour present systemic challenges to the rules-based international order”. That echoed US Secretary of State Antony Blinken’s earlier statement that “our purpose is not to contain China, to hold it back, to keep it down. It is to uphold this rules-based order that China is posing a challenge to.”
Where did it come from?
The RBO emerged in the early 1990s under the shadow of the “Liberal international order (LIO)” – a term that is still much more widely used.
~~~
BUT
China Wants a ‘Rules-Based International Order,’ Too
https://foreignpolicy.com/2021/03/31/china-wants-a-rules-based-international-order-too/
the distinction between the United States’ supposed commitment to a system of rules and China’s alleged lack thereof is misleading in at least three ways. First, it overlooks the United States’ own willingness to ignore, evade, or rewrite the rules whenever they seem inconvenient. If we are honest with ourselves, we have to acknowledge that Washington sometimes thinks it is perfectly okay for might to make right and for winners to take all. The collapse of the Soviet Union, when the United States took full advantage of a weakened post-Soviet Russia, is a perfect example.
Second, as Harvard University’s Alastair Iain Johnston has shown, China accepts and even defends many principles of the existing order, although of course not all of them. That situation may change in the future, of course, but even a vastly more powerful China would undoubtedly seek to retain whatever features of the present order serve its interests.
Third, statements such as Blinken’s imply that abandoning today’s rules-based order would leave us in a lawless, rule-free world of naked power politics, unregulated by any norms or principles whatsoever. This is simply not the case:
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
sorry, but I see nothing there that clears up what this "liberal world order" is.....the context the Biden official used the term seems to imply its merely a price fixing scheme......
interestingly as I was typing the above a commentator on TV called it "the globalizing new world order"........guess it encompasses all of the above.....
interestingly as I was typing the above a commentator on TV called it "the globalizing new world order"........guess it encompasses all of the above.....
basically it's take a free ride off using US military power as a guarantor,and get the USA to pay for as much as possible to protect this rules based "liberal" world order.
It's Biden/Blinken globalism with encouragement from Europe
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
they need to keep it general enough to justify anything lib'ruls want to accomplish......
Bigdog
Harris - make America a 3rd world shithole
The Orwellian Leftists have made so many political terms AMBIGUOUS. It makes it difficult for left and right to have a discussion.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search
This article is about the use of the term "new world order" in international politics. For the conspiracy theory, see New World Order (conspiracy theory). For other uses, see New World Order (disambiguation).