TRUMP KNEW THE RIOTERS ON 1/6 HAD WEAPONS AND WANTED THEM IN THE CAPITOL WITH THEM!
- Thread starter LurchAddams
- Start date
So coups only count as coups if there's gunfire?
No, they started at Trump's rally and then went over to the Capitol.
Everyone there that day was personally invited by Trump to the rally multiple times over Twitter.
Right, they left Trump's speech early to go to the Capitol.
You said yourself that the attacks on the police didn't start until 1:10PM, yet Trump's speech started at noon.
According to the 1/6 commission and the impeachment trial, everyone started out at Trump's rally and then the people who were at the rally started going to the Capitol before Trump finished his speech...probably because in the middle of his speech, he told them to go to the Capitol:
He said that halfway through his speech, around 12:30PM...which is about the same time people started walking over to the Capitol, again per the 1/6 commission's presentation earlier this year, and the impeachment proceedings.
Is time not linear?
If it wasn't all the same group, then who told the Proud Boys to show up to the Capitol and not Trump's speech...even though there is photographic evidence of the people who broke into the Capitol attending Trump's speech...again, per all the video footage we saw during impeachment, the 1/6 public hearings, and ALLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL the trials of the Nazis who invaded and attacked the Capitol over a lie told by Donald Trump, spread and enabled by people like you on JPP and other places.
Last edited:
So it was all one crowd to start, which is what I said that you disagreed with...and now you're agreeing with me.
So before when you said there were two different crowds, you were lying because it was all the same crowd to start, some of them just left the speech early.
So why did they leave the speech early? Because of this, uttered by Trump halfway through his speech that day:
Sawyerloggingon
Verified User
Actual you agreed with me and I clearly stated your narrative is false.
Quote Originally Posted by Sawyerloggingon View Post
Even in your false TDS narrative you say the crowd spilt into two separate crowds.
Here's the truth.
"While the Proud Boys "certainly showed no interest" in then-President Donald Trump's rally near the White House, Quested said he "hadn't really envisioned there was anything more sinister at the time."
https://www.nbcnews.com
Last edited:
There was no treasonous act.
Inversion fallacy. It is YOU playing word games, dumbass.
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! You think asking the SAME QUESTION that has ALREADY BEEN ANSWERED is going to change the answer???????????!?
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA! Do you actually think ASKING THE SAME QUESTION over and over mindlessly is going to produce a different ANSWER?????????!?
Babbitt was committing treason. Just because you don't like the facts do not eradicate them. Sorry. The poor bimbo got what she deserved.
It is not treason to be in the Capitol building. It is not treason to trespass. Redefinition fallacy.
Not a fact. An argument. Learn what 'fact' means. Redefinition fallacy. 'Fact' does not mean 'proof'.
So you condone shooting unarmed people. Gotit.
We now know from the J6 testimony that the rioters were armed. The cop had no way of knowing she wasn't. She deserve to die.
Lightbringer
Loves Me Some Souls
Hygiene is a real thing and if you have to go see your gynecologist about it.
Yeah, those are some serious issues. Have you tried cork?