Biden administration poised to raise gas costs another dollar or more

How do you know, stupid person? I think you're wrong, and I'm the genius, remember?

NO! You cannot fuck me! You're dickless anyway...:laugh:

Ho hooooooooooooooooooooooooooo! You can always tell when you've triggered a twumptard. My work is done here :) LOL!!!
 
"(i) Reducing Methane Emissions in the Oil and Gas Sector: “Oil and Natural Gas Sector: Emission Standards for New, Reconstructed, and Modified Sources Reconsideration,” 85 Fed. Reg. 57398 (September 15, 2020), by September 2021. "

"The “social cost of carbon” (SCC), “social cost of nitrous oxide” (SCN), and “social cost of methane” (SCM) are estimates of the monetized damages associated with incremental increases in greenhouse gas emissions. They are intended to include changes in net agricultural productivity, human health, property damage from increased flood risk, and the value of ecosystem services. An accurate social cost is essential for agencies to accurately determine the social benefits of reducing greenhouse gas emissions when conducting cost-benefit analyses of regulatory and other actions."

^"Carbon Credit" bullshit.



https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing...d-restoring-science-to-tackle-climate-crisis/

Read sections 6 and 7 then read the ones he cancelled to find out. You won't.

You've seen this link 8x and still are willfully ignorant.

Aw fuck, he went after appliances, too. :palm:
You haven't made the case that production is decreased for any other reason than profits.
 
My swimming pool is available for a nuclear reactor. That answer your question? I don't mind having 75 ppb of ozone out there. That's the current limit. I have several trash cans full of what amounts to pollution and like that the city comes and takes that away regularly, but there's always some there...

If I had a septic system, I'd be fine with that pollution too...
Sure you are.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...eaking-methane-a-climate-menace-idUSKBN23N1NL

In May 2012, Hanson and Michael Rowe noticed an overpowering smell, like rotten eggs, seeping from an abandoned gas well on their land in Kentucky. The fumes made the retired couple feel nauseous, dizzy, and short of breath.
Regulators responding to the leak couldn’t find an owner to fix it. J.D. Carty Resources LLC had drilled the well near the Rowes’ home in 2006 - promising the family a 12.5% royalty and free natural gas, which they never got. But Carty went bust in 2008 and sold the site to a company that was later acquired by Blue Energy LLC. Lawyers for both companies deny any responsibility for the leak.

 
Well, that's what they get for buying a home on or near land that has old oil wells on it, that are likely pre-environmental anything and largely or entirely unmonitored. In Arizona, it's old mines and tailings. You should be aware of this sort of thing when you buy the land. If you aren't that's on you.
I believe they fell for the rush to lease land to the oil companies. If you had toxic fumes around your family, you might feel differently about keeping an eye on oil companies.

Few U.S. cities are punctured with such a concentration of old drilling sites, with tens of thousands of residents living nearby, from Ladera Heights to Echo Park. If not plugged and cleaned up, many of these orphaned wells will continue to expose people to toxic gases, complicate redevelopment and pose rare but serious threats of explosions. If the state were to tackle the cleanup, it would cost tens of millions of dollars.
 
I believe they fell for the rush to lease land to the oil companies. If you had toxic fumes around your family, you might feel differently about keeping an eye on oil companies.

Newer wells are built to a different standard. That's why most of the problems are in places like Pennsylvania, California, or Texas where older wells exist. These would be grandfathered and not have to meet all modern standards.

Even then, there are things you could do to mitigate some of the issues if you were living near one or more of these wells. For example, if you had an issue with your water, that can be fixed with proper filtration. Of course, you would have to keep up on that or it won't help in the long run.
 
Newer wells are built to a different standard. That's why most of the problems are in places like Pennsylvania, California, or Texas where older wells exist. These would be grandfathered and not have to meet all modern standards.

Even then, there are things you could do to mitigate some of the issues if you were living near one or more of these wells. For example, if you had an issue with your water, that can be fixed with proper filtration. Of course, you would have to keep up on that or it won't help in the long run.
There is a major problem with new wells that were abandoned by companies that went under. They just left the scene, and toxic fumes are spewing into the environment.

Why is it a bad thing to prevent this?

But you are correct. There are tens of thousands of orphaned wells spewing toxins into the environment.
 
There is a major problem with new wells that were abandoned by companies that went under. They just left the scene, and toxic fumes are spewing into the environment.

Why is it a bad thing to prevent this?

But you are correct. There are tens of thousands of orphaned wells spewing toxins into the environment.

Show some evidence of that. It's mostly older wells that have run out of production and are capped off, same with mines.
 
I went out of my way to start shit I can't finish.

Good to see you're starting to realize this. This goes on as long as I'm having fun. It's no longer under your control. You wanted my attention, you got it, and I'm going to fuck with you until I get tired of doing it.
 
Back
Top