Cops have no constitutional duty to protect you

Not a cop but I support all the good people serving as police, firemen, the military and all over jobs that support our communities and our nation.

Police have absolutely no duty to protect you at all....that's the difference between cops and legitimate first responders.
 
you are so full of shit you liar..........you're doing the same gaslighting bullshit you've always done, like calling me a racist because I DON'T look at skin color.......so fuck off, hypocritical pussy

Stop being a little bitch about everything.

You said you never questioned the 2020 election, but then you said you did by determining, somehow, that there's "potential fraud" in mail-voting.

That's no different than Anatta lying on the boards about getting an unsolicited mail-in ballot.

You should have just kept your mouth shut.


and stop stealing my fucking topics like cops having to duty to protect you, you POS trash

Whose OP is this?
 
Care to bet on it

I don't make bets with people I don't trust.


The Las Vegas report has already been posted.

And of which the conclusion is that it's inconclusive why it even happened.

So it's not a complete report, it's a report that leaves behind more questions than it answers.

It's a report that doesn't explain why he did what he did...it just sort of seems like the investigators discovered the motive, but decided to keep it secret because of the implications.

How could the investigators of the worst mass shooting in US history not be able to determine the motive behind it? That is inconceivable to me.

Either investigators are not good at their jobs, or they are covering something up.
 
Stop being a little bitch about everything.

You said you never questioned the 2020 election, but then you said you did by determining, somehow, that there's "potential fraud" in mail-voting.

That's no different than Anatta lying on the boards about getting an unsolicited mail-in ballot.

You should have just kept your mouth shut.




Whose OP is this?

Projection. It's your OP, which is posted in "Current Events" even though it's from 2005; You retarded cock gobbler.

Apparently reading comprehension is not something you're adept at.
 
Stop being a little bitch about everything.

You said you never questioned the 2020 election, but then you said you did by determining, somehow, that there's "potential fraud" in mail-voting.
this is a fine example of you not being able to read or comprehend a god damned thing, you lousy fucking liar. continuing to make shit up makes you look dumber than evince...........

Whose OP is this?

who has been posting about this for YEARS??? and how many times did you tell me I was just a cop hater? I seem to remember a time when you thought cops were the ONLY ONES trained enough to protect people and carry guns.........remember that?
 
Agreed, which is why LV's hysteria about how this will all be swept under the rug is silly.

So in the "report" of the LV shooting, where did the investigators detail Paddock's motives?

Oh, they didn't???

So how could an investigation be concluded without determining the motive if it's not a cover-up????
 
Did you happen to read the conclusion from the LV shooting report? Because the conclusion was inconclusive as to why he did it.....

The same reason why most mass shooters do it: murder/suicide. He knew he wasn't leaving that hotel room alive the moment he stepped in and set up his firing position. Why do you think he'd want to commit suicide? Once that is known then his desire to go out as a mass murderer becomes a secondary and, possibly, explained.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Paddock#Possible_contributing_factors
His girlfriend stated Paddock did not talk in length about politics and did not belong to any political organizations. Paddock did express a dislike for the Obama administration and was happy when President Trump was elected. In addition, Paddock often complained of being sick and was sensitive to chemical smells.[3]

During his last months, Paddock reportedly often smelled of alcohol from early morning,[34][47] and he appeared despondent.[34] He was reported to have filled prescriptions for the anti-anxiety drug Valium in 2013,[33] in 2016, and finally again in June 2017, the latter being four months before the shooting.[48] The chief medical officer of the Las Vegas Recovery Center said the effects of the drug can be magnified by alcohol,[48] as confirmed by Michael First, a clinical psychiatry professor at Columbia University.[48][49][50][51]

During an interview with local CBS affiliate KLAS-TV, Clark County Sheriff Joe Lombardo said Paddock had reportedly been losing "a significant amount of wealth" since September 2015, which led to his having "bouts of depression".[52][53][54] According to his girlfriend, she noticed a decline of affection and intimacy towards her from Paddock, who had been romantic at first during their relationship; he attributed it to his declining health.[3]



https://www.newsweek.com/las-vegas-...r-retainer-valium-habit-would-gamble-1-680582
Las Vegas Gunman Had a Valium Habit, Would Gamble $1 Million a Night

Las Vegas gunman Stephen Paddock bet up to $1 million a night while he roamed casinos in sweatpants and flip-flops, carrying around cocktails from his room because he didn't want to tip the waitresses.
 
I don't make bets with people I don't trust.




And of which the conclusion is that it's inconclusive why it even happened.

So it's not a complete report, it's a report that leaves behind more questions than it answers.

It's a report that doesn't explain why he did what he did...it just sort of seems like the investigators discovered the motive, but decided to keep it secret because of the implications.

How could the investigators of the worst mass shooting in US history not be able to determine the motive behind it? That is inconceivable to me.

Either investigators are not good at their jobs, or they are covering something up.

It was either radicalized Muslim or ANTIFA sympathies.

Also there's video of M249 fire from a helicopter. Yeah. I wanna see what all the bullets were.
 
and I gave you the link to the FIRST case the SCOTUS made that decision, which was 1989. try to keep up

OK, but that doesn't have anything to do with the 2005 case based on a 1999 incident.

That 2005 decision supersedes anything that came before it.

Do you understand how SCOTUS precedent works?
 
this might come as a shock to you, but they ENFORCE THE LAW!!!!!!!!

Sooooo...how were they enforcing the law in Uvalde?

They didn't enforce the law, didn't they?

That's why all those kids died while the pigs stood around with their thumbs up their asses for over an hour.
 
I don't make bets with people I don't trust.

And of which the conclusion is that it's inconclusive why it even happened.

So it's not a complete report, it's a report that leaves behind more questions than it answers.

It's a report that doesn't explain why he did what he did...it just sort of seems like the investigators discovered the motive, but decided to keep it secret because of the implications.

How could the investigators of the worst mass shooting in US history not be able to determine the motive behind it? That is inconceivable to me.

Either investigators are not good at their jobs, or they are covering something up.
If you won and I didn't complete the bet, everyone would know. Isn't that reason enough? I prefer bets that can be publicly confirmed such as a 12B bet or donation to JPP in the winner's name. That way identity info is protected while still allowing the bet to take place and payments confirmed.

Paddock was suicidal. He decided to go out with a bang. Wouldn't it be nice if his problems had been discovered earlier and treated? Hundreds, if not thousands, of lives would have not been touched by the tragedy.
 
OK, but that doesn't have anything to do with the 2005 case based on a 1999 incident.

That 2005 decision supersedes anything that came before it.

Do you understand how SCOTUS precedent works?

I do, apparently you do not. the 2005 case decision is based on a 1989 decision..........THAT is called precedent.

you really are a dense fucking idiot.............can't even discern the difference between the phrases 'potential fraud' and 'potential FOR fraud'...........your higher education institution failed you miserably

now take your moronic ass elsewhere because you're starting to look more pathetic than evince
 
this is a fine example of you not being able to read or comprehend a god damned thing, you lousy fucking liar. continuing to make shit up makes you look dumber than evince...........



who has been posting about this for YEARS??? and how many times did you tell me I was just a cop hater? I seem to remember a time when you thought cops were the ONLY ONES trained enough to protect people and carry guns.........remember that?

Reading Comprehension is NOT OP's forte. ;)
 
Sooooo...how were they enforcing the law in Uvalde?

They didn't enforce the law, didn't they?

That's why all those kids died while the pigs stood around with their thumbs up their asses for over an hour.

you asked a specific question, I gave you a specific answer. It's your fucking problem you don't like it and need to misconstrue simple truth
 
Back
Top