T. A. Gardner
Serial Thread Killer
Nope they didn't.
Yes, they did. If they hadn't, they'd of critically reviewed her submissions and fact checked them. They didn't because her bullshit aligned with their views. It's no different than this:
Nope they didn't.
Yep they did.
Yes, they did. If they hadn't, they'd of critically reviewed her submissions and fact checked them. They didn't because her bullshit aligned with their views. It's no different than this:
[vieo=youtube;fvZNXRiAsn4]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fvZNXRiAsn4[/video]
The "journalism" in the stories was actually fabrication and the stories were written with 100% fictional sources... Thank the little GODS that they are so consistently used to "fact check" Fakebook.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/16/business/media/usa-today-fabricated-sources.html
And if you can't see NYTimes stories because of the pay wall:
https://www.cnn.com/2022/06/16/media/usa-today-removes-articles/index.html
Apparently they do not fact check their own publication unless someone points out that they don't have their facts right... So, these folks that are part of the US "partners" to fact check Fakebook uses stories fabricated by "journalists" to fact check Fakebook...
And finally: Just in case you don't believe that Fakebook uses USA Today as factcheckers...
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...-facebook-identify-misinformation/5032239002/
Oh! NOW they are working on a procedure. I thought they were supposed to be a professionally ran organization not a slipshod fly by night easily duped one. Seems like they didn't do their due diligence.She deceived them. They are now working on a procedure to prevent that from happening again.
WHATABOUTISMI wish Fox News was held to that same standard. Imagine how much more informed it's viewers would be?

Oh! NOW they are working on a procedure. I thought they were supposed to be a professionally ran organization not a slipshod fly by night easily duped one. Seems like they didn't do their due diligence.
And how do we know these are the only time. They don't have a procedure to prevent it as you noted.Let's see. It has been 40 years. Hmm. Don't you find that interesting?
Do you understand what deceiving people means? They realized their error and are making corrections now. You should be happy about that.
No, they got caught letting one of their writers publish bullshit repeatedly and now they have to deal with it. They didn't do that willingly and it is likely to happen again in the near future.
WHATABOUTISM![]()
And how do we know these are the only time. They don't have a procedure to prevent it as you noted.
Do you even know when USA Today was founded?
Irrelevant to the question at hand.
Not important. The important thing is the FACT CHECKERS didn't check their own "facts".Do you even know when USA Today was founded?
Not important. The important thing is the FACT CHECKERS didn't check their own "facts".
Too many. I guess Liberal have a high tolerance for fake news.bHow many articles were published in 40 years? And how many were found to be false?

Too many. I guess Liberal have a high tolerance for fake news.b![]()
How many articles were published in 40 years? And how many were found to be false?