RIGHT-WING IDIOTS' KEEPING SCHOOL CHILDREN SAFE FROM NRA/2ND: Open discussion

Into the Night

Well-known member
Contributor
Bring yet another thread out into open discussion, as yet another liberal thinks censorship actually works:

OP from original censored thread:
Right-wing idiots like DistressedBrane and others, are saying that in order to keep children safe in every one of our 100,000 public schools from being slaughtered by out of control 2nd Amendment beneficiaries, we as a nation should enact the following changes....

• Impenetrable steel doors.

• Reduce number of doors to one for all entry and exit.

• Eliminate windows

• Hire armed guards to man entry door and patrol school grounds stand guard over children on playground during recess and PE.

************************

What they refuse to address is HOW MUCH IS IT GOING TO COST TAXPAYERS?

HOW MUCH WILL PROPERTY TAXES HAVE TO BE RAISED NATIONWIDE TO HARDEN 100,000 PUBLIC SCHOOLS?

WHAT HAPPENS TO LOCAL ELECTED OFFICIALS WHO PASS MASSIVE TAX INCREASES WHEN RE-ELECTION TIME ROLLS AROUND?


I CAN HEAR THE CAMPAIGN ADS NOW.....

"OK, I KNOW I VOTED TO INCREASE YOUR PROPERTY TAXES BY 20% BUT THAT WAS SO KIDS CAN GO TO SCHOOL WITHOUT FEAR OF BEING MASSACRED BY A WACKED OUT 2ND AMENDMENT BENEFICIARY. PLEASE DON'T BLAME ME FOR PROTECTING THE RIGHTS OF ANY WEIRDO WITH AN AXE TO GRIND, OR SOME CONFUSED YOUNG KID RIGHT OUT OF HIGH SCHOOL WITH EMOTIONAL PROBLEMS, TO WALK INTO A STORE AND PURCHASE ASSAULT STYLE, HIGH CAPACITY WEAPONS AS EASILY AS BUYING A TOASTER OVEN OR A BICYCLE. I JUST GAVE YOU WHAT YOU WANTED!!! PLEASE DON'T HOLD ME ACCOUNTABLE FOR IT!!!!!"

BTW, reducing the number of doorways to only one, as I think one right-wing idiot in Congress might have suggested, is something that would likely not meet any local fire and safety codes in any locality anywhere in the US.
 
Bring yet another thread out into open discussion, as yet another liberal thinks censorship actually works:

OP from original censored thread:

Yes. Coming from the a guy who commands teachers not to talk to kids about gay people or slavery.

Republicans project so hard, it's pretty much all they do.
 
You'll just have to come up with something better, numb nuts, because we're not giving up our constitutional rights. ;)

Democrats seriously think they can get away with grabbing guns from over a hundred million gun owners. Yes...this is another example of Democrats discarding the Constitution.
 
Not a constitutional right.

The 1994 assault weapons ban was never ruled unconstitutional. It just wasn't reauthorized by a GOP congress in 2004.

Bans of bump stocks, high capacity ammunition clips, and sawed off shotguns will easily pass constitutional muster.

Nothing needs to be ruled unconstitutional for something to be unconstitutional. No court has authority to change or interpret the Constitution.
Discard of the Constitution of the United States and most State constitutions.

Congress does not need to 'reauthorize' the Constitution.

There is no such thing as an 'assault weapon'.
 
A guy tried to get through the steel locked doors of a elementary school in Gadsden Alabama this morning , he was shot and killed by a school resource officer. BOOM! there is your proof that locked doors and armed school personnel save lives.

Not sure if this anecdote actually occurred, but it does correctly illustrate an important point.
'Gun Free Zones' don't work. The best defense from a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.
 
The "ONLY ONE DOOR" idea is as moronic as the "SPRAY YOUR LUNGS WITH LYSOL" that was proposed during early Covid times.

You people just love simplistic moronic solutions.

Wonder why that is???

Typical of Frank. Making up shit and using it as proof of something. He is also ignoring several arguments just presented.
 
The Constitution calls for a "well regulated militia". That means the militia should be just as well equipped as the military. I know that isn't how it is now, but it's definitely how it should be.

This argument is actually in error.

2nd Amendment said:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

This amendment discusses TWO related rights, not one. BOTH are about self defense.

Any State (for that matter any government) has the inherent right of self defense. It does this by forming well organized (well regulated) militias (armies). It is responsible for training, organizing, and arming that army
Any individual has the inherent right of self defense. They do this by keeping (owning) and bearing (using) arms (weapon). That means ANY type of weapon.

Neither right shall be infringed. This is a specific directive to both federal and State governments (as well as cities and counties or parishes), HANDS OFF. The right is inherent.
 
You're the one who's playing games, motherfucker. The problem is the guns.

No. The problem is not the guns. The problem is the 'Gun Free Zones', Democrats staging mass shootings for satisfying their agenda to grab guns (sick stuff), and Democrats discarding the Constitution.
Blaming over a hundred million gun owners or their guns for a school shooting isn't going to wash, dude.
 
You don't want guns to protect yourself from the government. You want guns to protect yourself from "the blacks". Remember this St.Louis couple? That's you.

This is also what your racism looks like, by the way:

_114088607_4134eab6-8c47-491b-9969-589fd046adb4.jpg

Racism????!? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

No. These people were out defending their property from Antifa and BLM thugs that wanted to destroy it. Democrats fund and support violent factions like these.

Oh...and they didn't fire a single shot. Brandishing them was sufficient.
 
Democrats seriously think they can get away with grabbing guns from over a hundred million gun owners. Yes...this is another example of Democrats discarding the Constitution.

Just another regurgitation of gun manufacturers propaganda

No one is threatening confiscating guns, regulating guns, access to guns, is not “grabbing,” and why would you bring up the Constitution rant again when you have taken so many ten counts on the “argument”
 
No. The problem is not the guns. The problem is the 'Gun Free Zones', Democrats staging mass shootings for satisfying their agenda to grab guns (sick stuff), and Democrats discarding the Constitution.
Blaming over a hundred million gun owners or their guns for a school shooting isn't going to wash, dude.

Nope. And I see you're into quoting logic.. so here's some for ya:

Do Australia, New Zealand, and Great Britain have:

Unlocked doors? Yes.

Violent Video Games? Yes.

People who don't go to church? Yes

Kids who use social media? Yes.

Armed guards at schools? No.

Teachers armed? No?

SCHOOL SHOOTINGS? NO.

Now for America:

America has all of the above, except those counties above do not have guns.

I guess you solved the problem.

IT'S THE GUNS.

Check and mate.
 
Racism????!? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

No. These people were out defending their property from Antifa and BLM thugs that wanted to destroy it. Democrats fund and support violent factions like these.

Oh...and they didn't fire a single shot. Brandishing them was sufficient.

Oh, yes. The people were just walking through. You are so cute when you deny your racism.
 
The AR is a sporting rifle. It's used for target practice and competitions.
Myself, I don't have or want an AR, I have a much more powerful M1-A,
which is an actual military issued weapon.

It is also a decent hunting rifle. They also do pretty good at pest control, say, dispatching a coyote.
 
You assholes hate the NRA. Do you know the NRA is the largest private organization who put on responsible and the safe handling of firearms training for both citizens and law enforcement? Or is your hatred so ingrained in lies and bullshit coming from leftists like you?

Yes. Yes it is.
 
Back
Top