No Suitcase Of Ballots. Lie Publicly Debunked

[evince]

Mueller says you're a dizzy bint......

Link

 

[AProudLefty]

did anyone check to see who filled it?.....by the way, was the fact it was an official lockbox verified by the testimony of a woman with blond braids?.....

LOL. This level of cope.

 

[evince]

good lord, that's been linked on this board dozens of times.....where the fuck have you been?.....

So you can’t produce a link?


Noted

 

[PostmodernProphet]

...abc....def...ghi.....

keep practicing.....soon you'll know them all.....

 

[BidenPresident]

keep practicing.....soon you'll know them all.....

...apples...Trump...eighteen....summer....

 

[PostmodernProphet]

So you can’t produce a link?


Noted

so you are completely unaware of what is happening around you.......noted......

 

[martin]

if I did, not a single lib'rul could read it........

This from the side of the spectrum where a public library serves as a place where you can go the restroom in an emergency.

 

[evince]

so you are completely unaware of what is happening around you.......noted......

I’m aware you can’t provide proof of the things you claim repeatedly

 

[PostmodernProphet]

I’m aware you can’t provide proof of the things you claim repeatedly

the fact you are unaware of things everyone else is, is not our fault......

 

[LurchAddams]

Alright. I feel bad guys. I am now convinced there really is something to the suitcase thing. We need to reinstall twump until the investigation over the suitcase is completed.

Just kidding.

 

[AProudLefty]

It was most certainly posted here. LOL. During the whole mess and buildup to 1/6.

If you want to see it yourself it was this video I believe.

LOL they knew they were being videoed. Fail.

 

[Damocles]

LOL they knew they were being videoed. Fail.

Long distance video is not the same thing as actual watchers, you have no way to verify checks through the video. The point here, as a polling judge, especially one with partisan makeup, you don't get to dismiss the watchers and judges and do something like this and pretend that the video is enough. If the video was enough, poll watchers would not be necessary and they are not just allowed, but are also necessary to the process.

Because of the way they did this, this will always be in question. Even if you really really really don't want it to be and think it is just fine because it went your way.

 

[AProudLefty]

Well, there are several things wrong with your statement here.

Not the least is that this video was not from Fox News. LOL Only an idiot who didn't watch the video would have thought it was. Some folks do not want information that might be contrary to what they want to hear and therefore willfully remain in ingorance, you appear to be one of them.

Anyway, I keep agreeing with you (not stolen) while pointing out the issues that cause folks to continue to be skeptical of the veracity of the poll judges. Removing poll watchers from the scene then counting ballots will always cause this reaction in any close election.

Glad you are slowly waking up to the fact it was all a big lie.

 

[AProudLefty]

Long distance video is not the same thing as actual watchers, you have no way to verify checks through the video. The point here, as a polling judge, especially one with partisan makeup, you don't get to dismiss the watchers and judges and do something like this and pretend that the video is enough. If the video was enough, poll watchers would not be necessary and they are not just allowed, but are also necessary to the process.

Because of the way they did this, this will always be in question. Even if you really really really don't want it to be and think it is just fine because it went your way.

I don't want it to go the way I want.

 

[Damocles]

Glad you are slowly waking up to the fact it was all a big lie.

You clearly have reading comprehension issues. I have never believed that the election was "stolen" through "widespread election fraud".

 

[AProudLefty]

You clearly have reading comprehension issues. I have never believed that the election was "stolen" through "widespread election fraud".

Good.

 

[Monad Portal]

You clearly have reading comprehension issues. I have never believed that the election was "stolen" through "widespread election fraud".

though it clearly was.

and they bragged about it in a time article.

have you seen it? it's a confession.

 

[Damocles]

I don't want it to go the way I want.

Yet it did... and instead of simply recognizing why someone would think that was sketchy you pretend that just repeating that it wasn't is enough... I simply tell you directly, that this will always be in question and it is because of the sketchy way they handled things. No matter if the result was "perfect" what happened there should not happen, and it shouldn't so that this kind of skepticism built on process irregularities can instead be convinced through process regularities.

 

[Damocles]

though it clearly was.

and they bragged about it in a time article.

have you seen it? it's a confession.

No. Which article is that?

 

[Celticguy]

Long distance video is not the same thing as actual watchers, you have no way to verify checks through the video. The point here, as a polling judge, especially one with partisan makeup, you don't get to dismiss the watchers and judges and do something like this and pretend that the video is enough. If the video was enough, poll watchers would not be necessary and they are not just allowed, but are also necessary to the process.

Because of the way they did this, this will always be in question. Even if you really really really don't want it to be and think it is just fine because it went your way.

couple this with similarly unacceptable actions in a handful of other swing states and the notion of a "Big Lie" takes on a whole other meaning.