Patriot Front members in an U-Haul truck
- Thread starter AProudLefty
- Start date
Come to Texas, Sybil. I'll take you on a night Snipe hunt.
Sybil is already in Texas...in your head.
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
All Trump did was put a delay on their plans, and they couldn't be having that....
Another 4 years of Trump would have put them in a bad way, but they aren't there today.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
really now......please back that up with a bit of legal authority.......when you heard the phrase "dressed to kill" you obviously misunderstood the reference........
Matt Dillon
Retardium User
SKS is slower to reload, huh? I doubt that. A stripper clip can be jammed into 1 a lot quicker than changing magazines.
This story is a fascinating study in Fascism. Aside from the fact that any supremacy group is repugnant, let's discuss the facts of this unconstitutional act and why it is unconstitutional.
First and foremost; regardless of your beliefs and opinions, the First Amendment protects them. It doesn't define speech as something leftist snowflakes don't like.
Secondly; these guys had not broken any laws. Yes, they were in a U-Haul and yes, they had similar outfits on. But aside from that, had they broken any laws to be arrested? The Fifth states you have the right to due process.
I read that they were planning to disrupt a gay pride parade. What criminal code covers that? Until they engage in disruptive criminal behavior, they still have rights.
If this is the new low standard we are going to be using in this country, a lot of leftists will be going to jail.
Meanwhile, the DOJ refuses to arrest the protestors illegally threatening and protesting outside of Supreme Court justices homes which is a FELONY cited in 18 U.S.C. § 1507.
So while the DOJ ignores felonious behavior because it suits their politics, these morons get arrested because they MIGHT have disrupted a gay parade. WOW! How our principles upside down.
Thread Troll
a person who posts inflammatory, insincere, digressive,[1] extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community (such as social media (Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, etc.), a newsgroup, forum, chat room, or blog), with the intent of provoking readers into displaying emotional responses,[2] or manipulating others' perception. This is typically for the troll's amusement, or to achieve a specific result such as disrupting a rival's online activities or manipulating a political process
This story is a fascinating study in Fascism. Aside from the fact that any supremacy group is repugnant, let's discuss the facts of this unconstitutional act and why it is unconstitutional.
First and foremost; regardless of your beliefs and opinions, the First Amendment protects them. It doesn't define speech as something leftist snowflakes don't like.
Secondly; these guys had not broken any laws. Yes, they were in a U-Haul and yes, they had similar outfits on. But aside from that, had they broken any laws to be arrested? The Fifth states you have the right to due process.
I read that they were planning to disrupt a gay pride parade. What criminal code covers that? Until they engage in disruptive criminal behavior, they still have rights.
If this is the new low standard we are going to be using in this country, a lot of leftists will be going to jail.
Meanwhile, the DOJ refuses to arrest the protestors illegally threatening and protesting outside of Supreme Court justices homes which is a FELONY cited in 18 U.S.C. § 1507.
So while the DOJ ignores felonious behavior because it suits their politics, these morons get arrested because they MIGHT have disrupted a gay parade. WOW! How our principles upside down.
They had gears. And transporting humans in an U-Haul truck is illegal.
I’d do that for you at a rate of $350 an hour.
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..
sorry, from what I've seen your advice isn't worth the minimum wage.....
Conspiracy to riot and illegally transporting humans.
I can reload my M-1 quicker than either one of those. And it's more accurate.
WTF does this gibberrish mean? Did they have weapons? It's a yes or no question.
Really? Cite the criminal code that states this? So they were arrested on a traffic charge is what you're desperately trying to assert??
No one is paying a halfwit like you $350 an hour. Hell, you probably struggle tying your shoes in the morning.
