Political Theater

Into the Night said:
I don't think you'd like the result of that policy.
Click to expand...

I'd be on a lawn chair drinking a beer and eating peanuts while the traitors stand on the gallows.

Where would you be, Sybil? The Rubber Room? Working on your manifesto here?: https://politiplex.freeforums.net/board/19/debunking-signature LOL

6jkhpn.jpg
 
Eagle_Eye said:
This has been argued to no end. All I will add is read FBI director Comey's report to congress he lays out the findings. If you want to white wash his testimony in your liberal mind have a nut.
Click to expand...

According to Comey, there are two things that matter in a criminal investigation like this: Did the person being investigated mishandle classified information, and did the person know that what he or she was doing was illegal? "It takes mishandling it and criminal intent," he said.
Click to expand...
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/fbi...hillary-clinton-email-probe/story?id=41044927
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Hillary knew what she was doing. She can play the dumb blonde, but she did it deliberately.
Click to expand...

That doesn't make the classified emails a crime since the law requires that you KNOW the classified information is going to an unauthorized person.

In Clinton's case, the FBI did not find evidence "sufficient to establish" that she knew she was receiving or sending classified information and that it was against the law, Comey said.
Click to expand...
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
That doesn't make the classified emails a crime since the law requires that you KNOW the classified information is going to an unauthorized person.
Click to expand...

Sorry, dude, but you're wrong. Deliberately mishandling classified material is a crime. Hillary committed that crime by using an unsecure server to transmit classified material.

Question: If Hillary had classified material on a personal Blackberry, is that a crime?
Answer: Yes, it is.

amD1BAA4_700w_0.jpg
 
Dutch Uncle said:
Sorry, dude, but you're wrong. Deliberately mishandling classified material is a crime. Hillary committed that crime by using an unsecure server to transmit classified material.

Question: If Hillary had classified material on a personal Blackberry, is that a crime?
Answer: Yes, it is.

amD1BAA4_700w_0.jpg
Click to expand...

Absolutely. She was clearly in violation of laws on how to handle classified material.

I can remember a petty officer being court martialed for taking a reactor plant manual home (those are classified) to study so he could get qualified faster at his job. He had no intention of showing it to anyone or using it otherwise to study and intended to return it to the ship when done. He was court martialed over that.

Another I read about took a few photos of the inside of a nuclear sub without permission (the inside is classified)--as a side note, I was allowed to take photos and make drawings of a specific piece of gear on a nuclear SSBN for the specific purpose of manufacturing new ones, and all that stuff had to be sent to my command from the sub by a secure means and was locked up there when I wasn't using it. Interestingly, the parts involved themselves weren't classified yet, I had to follow those security procedures.
Anyway, the command found out and sent the guy involved to a court martial where his lawyer argued the Hillary defense.

She was fucking guilty as hell over that e-mail server.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Absolutely. She was clearly in violation of laws on how to handle classified material.

I can remember a petty officer being court martialed for taking a reactor plant manual home (those are classified) to study so he could get qualified faster at his job. He had no intention of showing it to anyone or using it otherwise to study and intended to return it to the ship when done. He was court martialed over that.

Another I read about took a few photos of the inside of a nuclear sub without permission (the inside is classified)--as a side note, I was allowed to take photos and make drawings of a specific piece of gear on a nuclear SSBN for the specific purpose of manufacturing new ones, and all that stuff had to be sent to my command from the sub by a secure means and was locked up there when I wasn't using it. Interestingly, the parts involved themselves weren't classified yet, I had to follow those security procedures.
Anyway, the command found out and sent the guy involved to a court martial where his lawyer argued the Hillary defense.

She was fucking guilty as hell over that e-mail server.
Click to expand...

Exactly. It was an election year in a narrow election and the decision was made by Obama and Lynch to give Hillary a pass. She deserved a censure at a minimum.

As this thread and others like it prove; most Americans don't know diddly squat about classified material handling.
 
18 U.S. Code § 793 (f) does NOT require intent.. This is Hillary crime
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
 
AssHatZombie said:
your points are stupid.

we're still a beacon of freedom.
Click to expand...

They certainly programmed you well, AssHat.
Beacon of freedom?
Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose.
What's important is living well, and Europeans live better than we do....AND they're free.
 
NiftyNiblick said:
They certainly programmed you well, AssHat.
Beacon of freedom?
Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose.
What's important is living well, and Europeans live better than we do....AND they're free.
Click to expand...

no.

freedom is the bill of rights from our constitution.

its very rare in the world.

why do you and your ilk hate freedom?

you need to quit sucking satan's dick.
 
AssHatZombie said:
no.

freedom is the bill of rights from our constitution.

its very rare in the world.

why do you and your ilk hate freedom?

you need to quit sucking satan's dick.
Click to expand...

There's no use to arguing with you, AssHat, because you simply don't understand anything.
You just spew platitudes like a good little drone.
You have the sophistication of a six year old at best.
Did your mom do heavy drugs while carrying you, or did the genetic damage occur generations earlier?
 
NiftyNiblick said:
There's no use to arguing with you, AssHat, because you simply don't understand anything.
You just spew platitudes like a good little drone.
You have the sophistication of a six year old at best.
Did your mom do heavy drugs while carrying you, or did the genetic damage occur generations earlier?
Click to expand...

The bill of rights isn't platitudes, dipshit. it means actual stuff, fuckface
 
T. A. Gardner said:
Absolutely. She was clearly in violation of laws on how to handle classified material.

I can remember a petty officer being court martialed for taking a reactor plant manual home (those are classified) to study so he could get qualified faster at his job. He had no intention of showing it to anyone or using it otherwise to study and intended to return it to the ship when done. He was court martialed over that.

Another I read about took a few photos of the inside of a nuclear sub without permission (the inside is classified)--as a side note, I was allowed to take photos and make drawings of a specific piece of gear on a nuclear SSBN for the specific purpose of manufacturing new ones, and all that stuff had to be sent to my command from the sub by a secure means and was locked up there when I wasn't using it. Interestingly, the parts involved themselves weren't classified yet, I had to follow those security procedures.
Anyway, the command found out and sent the guy involved to a court martial where his lawyer argued the Hillary defense.

She was fucking guilty as hell over that e-mail server.
Click to expand...

You can't deflect to Hillary anymore. She's not running for anything.

You are terrified.

We are loving it.

Be terrified more.
 
anatta said:
18 U.S. Code § 793 (f) does NOT require intent.. This is Hillary crime
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
Click to expand...

Your fear makes you desperate to talk about anything else. Poor thing.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top