Monad Portal
Was it me?
[h=1]18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees[/h]
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1505
not appearing is not obstructing.
[h=1]18 U.S. Code § 1505 - Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees[/h]
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1505
No one said it was a crime. Stop lying.
Ive considered banning him from threads, I hate the idea of banning anyone, so far it works for me to just ignore him.
I did not say anyone said it was a crime. However, someone ASKED if it was a crime and I responded.
"I'm here......so tell us cuntselor, is "losing touch with reality" a crime?" [PostmodernProphet].
Garland says his 1/6 crew is paying attention, I’ve always believed they were working their way up, and they may deal with issues, Ginni Thompson, that are too political for the House committee.I hate to break it to TD, but DOJ IS investigating this. And they are going to start getting to the real players, Rudy, Eastman, Navarro, and of course Trump. A rogues gallery of keystone cops. The level of stupidity required to believe these guys is off the charts.
Could this be the article you are referring to::
"Wisconsin Supreme Court Rules Trump Election Challenge 'Unreasonable In The Extreme'"
PIMP and TRUTH DEFLECTOR are to dumb to be embarrassed.
/shrugs.....we aren't the ones who are wrong.......
Felony obstruction, as usual, is one charge he could face.
“Based on the evidence, the Court finds it more likely than not that President Trump corruptly attempted to obstruct the Joint Session of Congress on January 6, 2021,” U.S. District Court Judge David Carter wrote.“
https://www.politico.com/amp/news/2022/03/28/trump-judge-felony-obstruction-insurrection-00020918
https://www.federalcriminallawyer.us/2020/07/24/federal-law-on-obstructing-justice-a-summary/#:~:text=Obstruction%20of%20justice%20is%20a,proceeding%20or%20the%20federal%20government.Obstructing or assaulting a process server (18 USC 1501)
Obstructing an extradition agent (18 USC 1502)
Influencing a juror in writing (18 USC 1504)
Theft or alteration of a record or process (18 USC 1506)
Demonstrating outside the residence of a judge, juror, or other officer of the court (18 USC 1507)
Listening in on federal grand jury proceedings (18 USC 1508)
Obstructing the execution of a court order (18 USC 1509)
Notifying a person about a forthcoming subpoena (18 USC 1510)
Obstructing for the purpose of illegal gambling (18 USC 1511)
Witness tampering (18 USC 1512)
Retaliating against a witness (18 USC 1513)
18 USC 1503 is the most common obstruction charge. The statute has two prongs-, one concerning obstruction by attempting to influence jurors or officers in a judicial proceeding; and another that concerns obstruction of the “due administration of justice.”
you know it is not.....
you are looking for Richard Teigen v. Wisconsin Elections Commission
https://www.wisdc.org/images/files/pdf_imported/drop-box-decision.pdf
PM is a troll. Why bother.
Since he asked if losing touch with reality is a crime, I took that to mean he agreed Trump was losing touch, but, it is not a crime.
Lying and cheating in an election
Today was the first day I heard Rudy was intoxicated when he was the only one who advised Trump to declare victory, that's my favorite thing about todays hearing.
You read too much into it. He was just trolling. As usual.
This has nothing to do with the outcome of the election, read it idiot. It took your handlers hours to come up with this??
if the method used in the election (drop boxes) was invalid, how does it not have something to do with the outcome of the election?.....
That is what Michigan, Pennsylvania, and Georgia election officials did, when will they be in prison?
When they can produce any evidence; so far, they found no cheating--only unfounded accusations.
No, I don't think Brandon won. There is always massive fraud by the left, but it has to be close to work. That's why it failed in 2016. Brandon couldn't get 30 people to a rally. Zero passion for the man.Deflection, and we can discuss two things at once. Aren't you embarrassed about your support for the big lie? (try to own up to it without deflection)