Garland called out to enforce law prohibiting picketing outside judges homes

[anatta]

Federal U.S. code 1507, states that any individual who "pickets or parades" with the "intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer" near a U.S. court or "near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer" will be fined, or "imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

The Biden administration has encouraged protesting outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes over the leaked abortion decision so long as it remains peaceful. Garland's DOJ, meanwhile, has yet to bring any charges against protesters targeting the justices' homes,
even after the alleged assassination attempt against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Former Trump administration Attorney General Bill Barr told Fox News Digital that the "law is crystal clear" and that "protests at a judge’s residence to influence a judge is a federal crime, and the law should be enforced."

"The Administration’s talking point that it supports the First Amendment is a non-answer," Barr said in an email. "The right to protest has always been subject to reasonable ‘time, place, and manner’ restrictions, like the federal law prohibiting demonstrations outside a judge’s residence."

The DOJ's response to the protests at justices' homes has drawn attention on Capitol Hill as well.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., blasted Garland as "a partisan hack who should resign in disgrace for dereliction of duty."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-garland-pressure-enforce-federal-law-protesters-justices-homes

 

[evince]

The great unplugging is coming for you



Putin is dying a painful death via blood cancer

 

[Earl]

Federal U.S. code 1507, states that any individual who "pickets or parades" with the "intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer" near a U.S. court or "near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer" will be fined, or "imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

The Biden administration has encouraged protesting outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes over the leaked abortion decision so long as it remains peaceful. Garland's DOJ, meanwhile, has yet to bring any charges against protesters targeting the justices' homes,
even after the alleged assassination attempt against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Former Trump administration Attorney General Bill Barr told Fox News Digital that the "law is crystal clear" and that "protests at a judge’s residence to influence a judge is a federal crime, and the law should be enforced."

"The Administration’s talking point that it supports the First Amendment is a non-answer," Barr said in an email. "The right to protest has always been subject to reasonable ‘time, place, and manner’ restrictions, like the federal law prohibiting demonstrations outside a judge’s residence."

The DOJ's response to the protests at justices' homes has drawn attention on Capitol Hill as well.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., blasted Garland as "a partisan hack who should resign in disgrace for dereliction of duty."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-garland-pressure-enforce-federal-law-protesters-justices-homes

I agree with Sen. Cotton.

If this were Kagen or Sotomayor, Garkland would have an Army battalion guarding them.

 

[Earl]

Federal U.S. code 1507, states that any individual who "pickets or parades" with the "intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer" near a U.S. court or "near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer" will be fined, or "imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

The Biden administration has encouraged protesting outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes over the leaked abortion decision so long as it remains peaceful. Garland's DOJ, meanwhile, has yet to bring any charges against protesters targeting the justices' homes,
even after the alleged assassination attempt against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Former Trump administration Attorney General Bill Barr told Fox News Digital that the "law is crystal clear" and that "protests at a judge’s residence to influence a judge is a federal crime, and the law should be enforced."

"The Administration’s talking point that it supports the First Amendment is a non-answer," Barr said in an email. "The right to protest has always been subject to reasonable ‘time, place, and manner’ restrictions, like the federal law prohibiting demonstrations outside a judge’s residence."

The DOJ's response to the protests at justices' homes has drawn attention on Capitol Hill as well.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., blasted Garland as "a partisan hack who should resign in disgrace for dereliction of duty."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-garland-pressure-enforce-federal-law-protesters-justices-homes

Biden and Garland are ignoring an attempt on the life of a sitting Supreme Court Justice.

 

[Earl]

Garland should resign.

 

[BidenPresident]

Federal U.S. code 1507, states that any individual who "pickets or parades" with the "intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer" near a U.S. court or "near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer" will be fined, or "imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

The Biden administration has encouraged protesting outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes over the leaked abortion decision so long as it remains peaceful. Garland's DOJ, meanwhile, has yet to bring any charges against protesters targeting the justices' homes,
even after the alleged assassination attempt against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Former Trump administration Attorney General Bill Barr told Fox News Digital that the "law is crystal clear" and that "protests at a judge’s residence to influence a judge is a federal crime, and the law should be enforced."

"The Administration’s talking point that it supports the First Amendment is a non-answer," Barr said in an email. "The right to protest has always been subject to reasonable ‘time, place, and manner’ restrictions, like the federal law prohibiting demonstrations outside a judge’s residence."

The DOJ's response to the protests at justices' homes has drawn attention on Capitol Hill as well.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., blasted Garland as "a partisan hack who should resign in disgrace for dereliction of duty."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-garland-pressure-enforce-federal-law-protesters-justices-homes

Garland won't prosecute Trump. Stand in line.

 

[ExpressLane]

Federal U.S. code 1507, states that any individual who "pickets or parades" with the "intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer" near a U.S. court or "near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer" will be fined, or "imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

The Biden administration has encouraged protesting outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes over the leaked abortion decision so long as it remains peaceful. Garland's DOJ, meanwhile, has yet to bring any charges against protesters targeting the justices' homes,
even after the alleged assassination attempt against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Former Trump administration Attorney General Bill Barr told Fox News Digital that the "law is crystal clear" and that "protests at a judge’s residence to influence a judge is a federal crime, and the law should be enforced."

"The Administration’s talking point that it supports the First Amendment is a non-answer," Barr said in an email. "The right to protest has always been subject to reasonable ‘time, place, and manner’ restrictions, like the federal law prohibiting demonstrations outside a judge’s residence."

The DOJ's response to the protests at justices' homes has drawn attention on Capitol Hill as well.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., blasted Garland as "a partisan hack who should resign in disgrace for dereliction of duty."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-garland-pressure-enforce-federal-law-protesters-justices-homes

Lf Garland does not enforce the law he should be impeached.

 

[Earl]

Garland won't prosecute Trump. Stand in line.

President Trump did not go to a sitting Supreme Court Justice's home with a gun, tie wraps, and duct tape and announce that he was there to kill the Justice.

You have no clue as to what Garland will do about Trump after the totally biased hearing that is nothing but political theater.

 

[floridafan]

President Trump did not go to a sitting Supreme Court Justice's home with a gun, tie wraps, and duct tape and announce that he was there to kill the Justice.

You have no clue as to what Garland will do about Trump after the totally biased hearing that is nothing but political theater.

Facts are never biased. What part of this hearing do you disagree with- be specific

 

[anatta]

there is a bill Pelosi is sitting on to provide upgrades and permanent protection -
it passed the Senate unanimous consent

 

[zymurgy]

he should be removed. it is absurd in this climate that he will allow people to attempt to intimidate a justice - the law can't be any more clear. he is a scumbag partisan actor, not a law talking guy

 

[Gondwanaland]

Federal U.S. code 1507, states that any individual who "pickets or parades" with the "intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer" near a U.S. court or "near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer" will be fined, or "imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

The Biden administration has encouraged protesting outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes over the leaked abortion decision so long as it remains peaceful. Garland's DOJ, meanwhile, has yet to bring any charges against protesters targeting the justices' homes,
even after the alleged assassination attempt against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Former Trump administration Attorney General Bill Barr told Fox News Digital that the "law is crystal clear" and that "protests at a judge’s residence to influence a judge is a federal crime, and the law should be enforced."

"The Administration’s talking point that it supports the First Amendment is a non-answer," Barr said in an email. "The right to protest has always been subject to reasonable ‘time, place, and manner’ restrictions, like the federal law prohibiting demonstrations outside a judge’s residence."

The DOJ's response to the protests at justices' homes has drawn attention on Capitol Hill as well.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., blasted Garland as "a partisan hack who should resign in disgrace for dereliction of duty."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-garland-pressure-enforce-federal-law-protesters-justices-homes

Given the current big deal being made over 1/6 riots, and the fact that most of the folks being charged are being charged with breaking a very similar US code, we certainly should be doing this.

 

[archives]

Federal U.S. code 1507, states that any individual who "pickets or parades" with the "intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer" near a U.S. court or "near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer" will be fined, or "imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

The Biden administration has encouraged protesting outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes over the leaked abortion decision so long as it remains peaceful. Garland's DOJ, meanwhile, has yet to bring any charges against protesters targeting the justices' homes,
even after the alleged assassination attempt against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Former Trump administration Attorney General Bill Barr told Fox News Digital that the "law is crystal clear" and that "protests at a judge’s residence to influence a judge is a federal crime, and the law should be enforced."

"The Administration’s talking point that it supports the First Amendment is a non-answer," Barr said in an email. "The right to protest has always been subject to reasonable ‘time, place, and manner’ restrictions, like the federal law prohibiting demonstrations outside a judge’s residence."

The DOJ's response to the protests at justices' homes has drawn attention on Capitol Hill as well.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., blasted Garland as "a partisan hack who should resign in disgrace for dereliction of duty."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-garland-pressure-enforce-federal-law-protesters-justices-homes

Ah, the suppose assassin was picked up blocks from Brett's house, and at any given time Bret has had armed police outside of this home, not like he was ever out there on his own as Fox likes to portray it, and funding for additional protection has been introduced in the House

Simply a deflection off of the January 6th Committee, Durham bombed, so they have to come up with anything they can float

 

[signalmankenneth]

Federal U.S. code 1507, states that any individual who "pickets or parades" with the "intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer" near a U.S. court or "near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer" will be fined, or "imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

The Biden administration has encouraged protesting outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes over the leaked abortion decision so long as it remains peaceful. Garland's DOJ, meanwhile, has yet to bring any charges against protesters targeting the justices' homes,
even after the alleged assassination attempt against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Former Trump administration Attorney General Bill Barr told Fox News Digital that the "law is crystal clear" and that "protests at a judge’s residence to influence a judge is a federal crime, and the law should be enforced."

"The Administration’s talking point that it supports the First Amendment is a non-answer," Barr said in an email. "The right to protest has always been subject to reasonable ‘time, place, and manner’ restrictions, like the federal law prohibiting demonstrations outside a judge’s residence."

The DOJ's response to the protests at justices' homes has drawn attention on Capitol Hill as well.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., blasted Garland as "a partisan hack who should resign in disgrace for dereliction of duty."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-garland-pressure-enforce-federal-law-protesters-justices-homes

Garland needs to be called out, but not for protest at justices homes, but this:

 

[Truth Detector]

Federal U.S. code 1507, states that any individual who "pickets or parades" with the "intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer" near a U.S. court or "near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer" will be fined, or "imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

The Biden administration has encouraged protesting outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes over the leaked abortion decision so long as it remains peaceful. Garland's DOJ, meanwhile, has yet to bring any charges against protesters targeting the justices' homes,
even after the alleged assassination attempt against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Former Trump administration Attorney General Bill Barr told Fox News Digital that the "law is crystal clear" and that "protests at a judge’s residence to influence a judge is a federal crime, and the law should be enforced."

"The Administration’s talking point that it supports the First Amendment is a non-answer," Barr said in an email. "The right to protest has always been subject to reasonable ‘time, place, and manner’ restrictions, like the federal law prohibiting demonstrations outside a judge’s residence."

The DOJ's response to the protests at justices' homes has drawn attention on Capitol Hill as well.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., blasted Garland as "a partisan hack who should resign in disgrace for dereliction of duty."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-garland-pressure-enforce-federal-law-protesters-justices-homes

They don't care. if it fits their political agenda, its okay to them. However, imagine if i were in front of Kagans, or Sotomayors?

 

[Truth Detector]

The great unplugging is coming for you
Putin is dying a painful death via blood cancer

half-wit
noun
\ ˈhaf-ˌwit , ˈhäf- \
: a foolish or stupid person

gib•ber•ish (ˈdʒɪb ər ɪʃ, ˈgɪb-)
n.
1. meaningless or unintelligible talk or writing; nonsense.
2. talk or writing containing many obscure, pretentious, or technical words.

 

[Truth Detector]

there is a bill Pelosi is sitting on to provide upgrades and permanent protection -
it passed the Senate unanimous consent

She doesn't care.

 

[LurchAddams]

Federal U.S. code 1507, states that any individual who "pickets or parades" with the "intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer" near a U.S. court or "near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer" will be fined, or "imprisoned not more than one year, or both."

The Biden administration has encouraged protesting outside of Supreme Court justices’ homes over the leaked abortion decision so long as it remains peaceful. Garland's DOJ, meanwhile, has yet to bring any charges against protesters targeting the justices' homes,
even after the alleged assassination attempt against Justice Brett Kavanaugh.

Former Trump administration Attorney General Bill Barr told Fox News Digital that the "law is crystal clear" and that "protests at a judge’s residence to influence a judge is a federal crime, and the law should be enforced."

"The Administration’s talking point that it supports the First Amendment is a non-answer," Barr said in an email. "The right to protest has always been subject to reasonable ‘time, place, and manner’ restrictions, like the federal law prohibiting demonstrations outside a judge’s residence."

The DOJ's response to the protests at justices' homes has drawn attention on Capitol Hill as well.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., blasted Garland as "a partisan hack who should resign in disgrace for dereliction of duty."
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-garland-pressure-enforce-federal-law-protesters-justices-homes

Oh, don't worry. Garland will enforce the law. The greatest evil in American history has been done to us by our former president and his evil minions.

They will all be held accountable.

Do not worry.

 

[LurchAddams]

The great unplugging is coming for you



Putin is dying a painful death via blood cancer

Oh, is it really painful? I so want it to be. Please, don't tease!

 

[LurchAddams]

Garland won't prosecute Trump. Stand in line.

Well.... at this point... we don't know. We do know, it's looking pretty bad for the folks around him who did know, helped stoke the lie, made money off the lie, and let the attack happen.

Navarro, Rudy, Bannon, Meadows, Ginny Thomas, et al.. they all knew the truth.

Can't wait to see those demons in chains.