Here is your chance to address the argument and facts presented.

no, I was commenting on your stupid analogy.

My point was that it doesnt matter nor was it so.

What is stupid about it? Its the same issue. You cant just get out of crimes because you claim you did not know something you clearly should have known.
 
So you refuse to try to counter any of the arguments and evidence presented?
I understand.

There were no arguments presented. There was zero evidence of a crime. All we saw last night was a bunch of hateful, insane, Trump hating dullards shrieking "BUT TRUMP!!"

There was no discussion about why, on that morning, there were only a tiny handful of police at the Capital. One of the cops admitted that there were only FIVE of them trying to hold back a crowd of over 200.

Why was the intelligence gathered days in advance about the threat of violence ignored by Schumer, Pelosi, the Capital police and the mayor of DC?

Why were Trump efforts to provide 20,000 National Guard troops ignored and not requested by Pelosi and the Mayor of DC?

Why does Liz the liar believe that it was Trump's responsibility to provide security when we know that belongs to the Mayor of DC and Pelosi as Speaker of the House?

These are the REAL questions. We know what happened. The injuries and damage to the capital have been condemned by everyone. We don't need an hour of video to know how things got out of hand.

What we do need to know is why the Democrats and Mayor of DC refused to defend the capital knowing in advance this was going to happen. Can you explain that?

This isn't about Trump. This isn't about the mostly peaceful protestors who felt disenfranchised. This is about a gross failure and incompetence of the leadership of the House and DC.

But alas, the Democratic leadership have exempted themselves from this investigation and are off limits. For anyone with half a brain, that is a problem and begs for answers.
 
Last edited:
Just address the evidence... what's incorrect about it?

What evidence was presented? I saw nothing that would support the notion that Trump acted improper. I am waiting for the evidence on why the Democratic leadership and DC mayor refused to protect the capital when they were warned this would happen.
 
Citation?
Are government memos withheld by this committee enough?

Government memos validate the long-held claim of Trump administration officials that Capitol Police rejected an offer made by the Pentagon four days before the Jan. 6 riot to provide National Guard troops.

An official Capitol Police timeline obtained by Just the News records a Jan. 2, 2021, text from Defense Department official Carol Corbin to Capitol Police deputy chief Sean Gallagher.

Corbin, according to the timeline, reached out "to determine whether USCP is considering a request for National Guard soldiers for January 6, 2021 event."

The following morning, "Gallagher replies to DOD via text that a request for National Guard support not forthcoming at this time after consultation with COP Sund," referring to Steven Sund, the chief of the Capitol Police.

Just the News noted the rejection came as the Capitol Police was beginning to change its assessment of Jan. 6, 2021, to take into account a massive Trump rally to protest the November 2020 election results.

As of Dec. 16, 2020, Capitol Police had determined there was "no information regarding specific disruptions or acts of civil disobedience targeting this function."

But internal emails and documents show police were aware of groups planning to attend the Jan. 6 rally that were discussing on social media and fringe websites tactics such a blocking tunnels leading to the Capitol.


USCPJan.6Timeline.pdf


https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/tr...uard-to-capitol-four-days-before-jan-6-riots/

https://dailyangle.com/articles/memo-confirms-trump-pentagon-offered-guard-troops-before-jan-6
 
Last edited:
Here is my rebuttal; prove me wrong: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?190343-The-January-6th-Clown-Show-and-HOAX-Part-1

It is amusing that dullards on the left, like yourself, think that Presidents who have opinions cannot express them and beli8eve that the expression of opinions is somehow a crime.

I'm still waiting on evidence that Trump planned, executed and carried out this protest the Democrats falsey and idiotically call an "insurrection."
:palm:

How about the part where all the arrested perps said the president asked them to do it?
 
Trump organized the violent coup attempt. First thing the committee said in hearing.

There is no evidence provided to support that lie. It's a fabrication by the Democratic Party of Lying Jackasses for their theatre and thrid impeachment attempt.

You would think that after failing miserably with the Mueller Hoax, the Ukraine Hoax and the Incitement impeachment HOAX, they would give up. But Democrats are morons. It's not enough to destroy our economy, ignore our southern order allowing millions to enter illegally, and embarrass us in Afghanistan.

Noooooo, they think that if they try a FOURTH time, this will get that bad Trump man. Meanwhile, the RED tsunami train is heading their way in November and they have no way to stop it. So in a last gasp effort to grasp straws, a theatrical clown show produced by ABC and promoted by the dishonest lying PHONY media is going to get them across the finish line.

It can't get much dumber than that. The real debate is here: https://www.justplainpolitics.com/showthread.php?190343-The-January-6th-Clown-Show-and-HOAX-Part-1
 
How about the part where all the arrested perps said the president asked them to do it?

The president didn't ask them to do it mental case halfwit. They "believed" it was a call to arms. Yet, it was a verbal gaff in a debate where Trump was forced to not only debate Biden, but the moderator clown named Wallace as well.

Take your meds.
 
political theatre <> reality

If it is merely theater than you should be able to present a counter argument that destroys the main points being presented.


You could argue that it is merely a one sided argument since there is no rebuttal but why not give us that rebuttal if you think it exists. If the committee was the prosecutor presenting facts to convict and this is your defense, the only question for the jury would be how long the defendant should spend in jail.
 
The president didn't ask them to do it mental case halfwit. They "believed" it was a call to arms. Yet, it was a verbal gaff in a debate where Trump was forced to not only debate Biden, but the moderator clown named Wallace as well.

Take your meds.



Don’t tell me that you turd digester


Tell the criminals who did the crime that


Their Testimony is already on record though



“Come to DC, it will be wild”
 
Don’t tell me that you turd digester
Tell the criminals who did the crime that
Their Testimony is already on record though
“Come to DC, it will be wild”

OMG!!! Trump said "come to DC, it will be wild!" No mental case halfwit, not a crime. :palm:
 
Back
Top