Fox Will Not Cover 1-6 Hearings Live

Nuts on the right get 24-7 media coverage while nuts on the left get quickly swept under the rug.

Dude, you just proved Trumpians are pussified whiners. "Buuuuttttt Mommmmmm, the Lefties get away with it! Why can't I lie to Congress and the FBI tooooooo!!!!"

I hope all the traitors and their supporters burn for their crimes.

6a7ebu.jpg
 
Do you really believe they are puppets of the Left with no regard to their oaths? What about those in the Trump administration? Do you think any of them violated their oaths by plotting to overthrow the election?

How many Republicans should go down for this and how many will?

I believe that they are willing to continue saying what got them appointed to the committee and stopped other appointees from being "accepted". Whether you believe that makes them "puppets" is up to you. I also know that folks appointed that would not tow that line on this subject were rejected and removed from the committee because it has never been an attempt to find truth, if you had a different opinion you were not welcome into Pelosi's propaganda committee.
 
Remember the "mostly peaceful" riots where you could see buildings burning in the background?

Yes.

No hearings for riots that caused billions of dollars in damages.

Now Pelosi is holding back a bill passed unanimously by the Senate which gives further protection to Supreme Court Justices.
 
Yes.

No hearings for riots that caused billions of dollars in damages.

Now Pelosi is holding back a bill passed unanimously by the Senate which gives further protection to Supreme Court Justices.

This is happening while folks are literally trying to assassinate justices.
 
Why are Supreme Court Justices more important than schools and grocery store victims who were actually killed?

Whoever said that they were? That's a you thing.

This legislation was put on hold by Pelosi long before Uvalde happened. The reality: Pelosi doesn't want to hear it because she thinks that threats to Justices are currently on her side of policy. Also, the proposed legislation simply doesn't take guns away from folks that Pelosi doesn't like.
 
Why are Supreme Court Justices more important than schools and grocery store victims who were actually killed?

So, you don’t care that a far left Democrat tried to murder a Supreme Court justice.

If it had been Sotomayor or Kagan, you would be screaming your head off, you clown.
 
All the other networks will present the Congressional hearings on the 1-6 Insurrection live tonight.

"Fox News will not be covering the January 6 committee's long-awaited first hearing live and its prime time shows will only discuss Thursday's proceedings if it is warranted, the network has announced.

...

The network said that its prime time programs that will air at the same time the hearings take place from 8 p.m. EDT Thursday, Tucker Carlson Tonight and Hannity, will not be showing the proceedings live on air and will only cover the hearings "as news warrants." "

Fox News Will Not Broadcast Jan. 6 Committee Hearing Live

Not 'breaking newsy' enough. Unimportant. And I supposed it is widely deemed that Fox viewers don't want to hear the actual news anyway. Fox would not want them hearing the truth.
Why cover a sham? They're doing the right thing.
 
Whoever said that they were? That's a you thing.

This legislation was put on hold by Pelosi long before Uvalde happened. The reality: Pelosi doesn't want to hear it because she thinks that threats to Justices are currently on her side of policy. Also, the proposed legislation simply doesn't take guns away from folks that Pelosi doesn't like.
Justices already have security, but I’m sure you know that.
 
Justices already have security, but I’m sure you know that.

Yet there has been a law passed to provide them more protection being ignored by Pelosi because she believes that it will aid her political agenda. Pretending that this had anything to do with Uvalde is preposterous the threat to these folks increased long before Uvalde. Pelosi ignores the legislation because she believes that it can help her political agenda, not for any other reason. You support it for the same reason.
 
I believe that they are willing to continue saying what got them appointed to the committee and stopped other appointees from being "accepted". Whether you believe that makes them "puppets" is up to you. I also know that folks appointed that would not tow that line on this subject were rejected and removed from the committee because it has never been an attempt to find truth, if you had a different opinion you were not welcome into Pelosi's propaganda committee.

I don't believe Cheney is anyone's puppet. I believe she strongly abides by her oath even if it costs her job. Trumpians like Cruz, Jordan and others are not as honorable. Anyone who supported the plot should be held accountable for it.
 
Hello Damo,

Again, there are two hand selected folks that will do and say what they want to hear. I recognize that they exist, it doesn't change what is: This is a partisan propaganda effort to attempt to change the current trend that they see coming in November. The problem they have is all they have is old crap that we've already heard. They are going to try to pretend that some video we haven't seen yet is "new information" but it isn't. We've already heard they were speaking to the "investigation" and have reports of what they said. Just showing us a video isn't "new" it's just trying to put some lipstick on that pig.

Folks that broke laws are being held accountable in actual trials. This effort is just partisan propaganda with carefully selected and scripted questions from people who they are ensured will speak only in the terms they want to hear. Someone to actually defend them? Not allowed. This isn't a hearing, this is simple propaganda.

I disagree.

It is hardly partisan since it includes members from both parties.

And it has nothing to do with the 2022 election. It is about Trump's refusal to accept the results of the 2020 election, the lengths he went to to try to illegally remain in power despite losing, and the insurrection he caused with The Big Lie.

It is remarkable how close we came to losing our democracy on January 6th.

This nation would be foolish not to study what happened in great detail to do our best to ensure that it never happens again.

1-6 tested our Constitution. We passed, but only with luck. We need to be better prepared for such domestic enemies in the future. Domestic enemies are a real threat to our nation right now.
 
Hello Sawyerloggingon,

Two of their biggest news personalities are devoting an entire show to the democrats made for TV docudrama and it's being advertised and promoted constantly on FOX.

Try again.

It is a bipartisan Committee. The Committee is not acting as a political agent. The Committee is doing it's duty to protect and serve the US Constitution.
 
Hello Dutch,

Do you really believe they are puppets of the Left with no regard to their oaths? What about those in the Trump administration? Do you think any of them violated their oaths by plotting to overthrow the election?

How many Republicans should go down for this and how many will?

Last night it was said that several Republicans sought out Trump requesting pardons.

What did they think they needed to be pardoned for?
 
Hello Sawyerloggingon,

In other words you and others claiming FOX isn't covering the democrats political theatre show are wrong or lying.

There is no such thing. It is an investigation of one of the most dangerous times for our Constitution since the Civil War.

Republicans are indicated, so naturally they are trying to discredit the proceedings. Don't buy that hype.

It is what it is. An official government function.
 
Hello Sawyerloggingon,



There is no such thing. It is an investigation of one of the most dangerous times for our Constitution since the Civil War.

Republicans are indicated, so naturally they are trying to discredit the proceedings. Don't buy that hype.

It is what it is. An official government function.

Official democrat talking point.
 
Hello archives,

Cheney, one of the most conservative voices in the House, is going to "do and say" what the Democrats on the Committee tell her to "do and say?"

Look at the history of this Committee, right after the attack both McCarthy and McConnell called for an investigation into the events of the day. Pelosi gave McCarthy and McConnell everything they asked for, everything they laid out they wanted, even the power for the Republicans on the Committee without a majority vote to subpoena anyone they wanted. At that point, both Kevin and Mitch said they weren't interested, in other words, they didn't want any investigation, largely for political reasons

So Pelosi went ahead and started a Committee, and when requesting McCarthy's recommendations for members, Kevin sought to purposely sabotage the Committee by appointing two Representative famous for their theatrics. Pelosi didn't accept them, McCarthy pulled the plug, and the other two GOP representative felt the matter did need attention and stepped forward

To dismiss the Committee as totally partisan is inane, right wing deflection, and the Committee's purpose is to determine who "broke laws" and should be "held accountable"

There you go. Spilling the beans of truth. And now it's all over their pretty propaganda. And just look. Their flimsy story is ruined.

Looks like the believers in The Big Lie are just going to have to suck it up and admit the truth is inescapable.

Trump lost. He royally screwed up the pandemic response, that caused inflation to be far worse than it ever needed to be, and now the economic pain caused by Trump is real. Voters held Trump responsible for his poor pandemic response.

And Trump could find himself in deeper legal trouble than his BS can dig him out of.
 
Hello Sawyerloggingon,



It is a bipartisan Committee. The Committee is not acting as a political agent. The Committee is doing it's duty to protect and serve the US Constitution.

Committee hand picked by Pelosi. Six democrats two rabid Trump hater Republicans. All official swamp members in good standing.
 
Back
Top