Fox Will Not Cover 1-6 Hearings Live

[PoliTalker]

Hello Damo,

The investigation has been happening over the past 1.5 years and they are going to put on a show for us now even though everything they will talk about has already been reported. Your false equivalence is extremely weak and clearly partisan.

I heard they have held back. New information will be presented.

 

[Lionfish]

I wouldn't do that if I were you. You might actually learn something and become more informed. It's obvious you prefer wallowing in ignorance and stupidity.

Errr, they are covering it.

 

[Damocles]

Hello Sawyerloggingon,



Tucker fans will watch Tucker instead of the truth.

Can't have it both ways.

Tucker isn't news any more than Rachel Maddow is, it is an editorial show. Pretending that his evening show is somehow usurping reporting is nonsense. It's an editorial show, folks tune in to hear an opinion like they do when they are watching Rachel.

 

[Damocles]

Hello Damo,



I heard they have held back. New information will be presented.

I heard that it is simply showing videos of stuff we have already heard happened. I do not believe that anything new will be brought to bear during these "hearings" just old video that the "Normal Jim" has never seen only heard about...

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Damo,

It's a completely partisan event where only specific folks that they know will be kind to their side of things are allowed to participate.

It will, for once, be a functional hearing without the histrionics of extremists like Jim Jordan, Elise Stefanik or Louis Gohmert. Those people would only serve to disrupt and sully the proceedings.

 

[evince]

Hello Damo,



I heard they have held back. New information will be presented.

He’s lying


The investigation has mountains of evidence that is yet to be public


Surrendered documents

Phone records


Testimony of hordes of Republican staff


This is going to be a mountain day of new evidence


Brain voids like Damo will just lie about what gets reported


It’s sad

He used to be a honest guy who dealt in facts


His brain has been melted by propaganda

 

[Damocles]

Hello Damo,



It will, for once, be a functional hearing without the histrionics of extremists like Jim Jordan, Elise Stefanik or Louis Gohmert. Those people would only serve to disrupt and sully the proceedings.

It will, be a propaganda effort with specific and carefully selected participants that they know will be kind to their worldview. It's partisan propaganda repeating the same information we have already heard.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello evince,

They are a news station that doesn’t want people to watch that day for some reason




They are supposed to be a news BUSINESS


They are making an idiotic choice with programing that will lose them viewers for what reasons?


Oh out of kindness to people who don’t want news

It's censorship. They will pick and choose what news to cover as their bias dictates.

 

[evince]

Tucker isn't news any more than Rachel Maddow is, it is an editorial show. Pretending that his evening show is somehow usurping reporting is nonsense. It's an editorial show, folks tune in to hear an opinion like they do when they are watching Rachel.

Dude

This is pathetic

Rachel doesn’t present propaganda


She presents documented facts


You cant believe you love Tucker


That is so pathetic

 

[evince]

It will, be a propaganda effort with specific and carefully selected participants that they know will be kind to their worldview. It's partisan propaganda repeating the same information we have already heard.

As you will say no matter how big the mountain of facts are
You are pathetic now

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Damo,

They have hand picked specific people, like I stated before, that they know will be kind to their cause. They literally would not allow others making it clear that it is a solely partisan effort to propagandize folks.

The 'cause' is getting to the truth.

If Trump didn't want this truth coming out he should have accepted the results of the free and fair election.

 

[Truth Detector]

Why? They didn't help you any. LOL

Projection
Projection is the process of displacing one’s feelings onto a different person, animal, or object. The term is most commonly used to describe defensive projection—attributing one’s own unacceptable urges to another. For example, if someone continuously bullies and ridicules a peer about his insecurities, the bully might be projecting his own struggle with self-esteem onto the other person.

 

[Truth Detector]

Fox viewers can't handle the truth.

Ironic coming from a liar that avoids the truth. You would be better informed watching Fox than the bullshit you gobble down on MSNBC.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Phantasmal,

I don’t think Liz Cheney or Adam Kinzinger would be a part of that, neither wants this to be Democrat propaganda. They are genuinely concerned about what happened on 1/6.

Precisely!

 

[Damocles]

Dude

This is pathetic

Rachel doesn’t present propaganda


She presents documented facts


You cant believe you love Tucker


That is so pathetic

Wow, you are a hack. Rachel is an editorial show. She presents her opinion, that it meshes with yours makes you think it is the same thing as "real", but it is just as much an opinion when it comes from you too, and it smells just as badly.

 

[Truth Detector]

Agreed and the truth is that Fox News had a part in this. Remember the news a few weeks back about Sean's reaction and trying to contact the President?

A part in what? It's apparent that the "this" gullible fools bloviate about is this nonsensical bullshit about sedition and insurrection. Neither of which occurred here.

 

[Truth Detector]

Errr, they are covering it.

Re-read my post. I wasn't talking about coverage.

 

[Truth Detector]

Tucker isn't news any more than Rachel Maddow is, it is an editorial show. Pretending that his evening show is somehow usurping reporting is nonsense. It's an editorial show, folks tune in to hear an opinion like they do when they are watching Rachel.

It is all about the news. Apparently you never watched it. Try it sometime, you might like him.

 

[PoliTalker]

Hello Damo,

Well, they are covering it, just not on the channel you want them to... and I will bet you money that they will certainly talk about it providing coverage, just not 24/7 and live coverage on the main channel, that is relegated to other channels of their network allowing folks to watch when and if they want.

If they refuse to air it and then talk about it that strongly suggests the reason is to add their own bias.

They don't want to put it on the main channel because it would contradict The Big Lie they all foolishly believe.

 

[Lionfish]

Hello Sawyerloggingon,



And they will keep their regular Fox News viewers from seeing it.

Because they are in denial.

They promoted The Big Lie.

Why don't you give us a minute by minute update and call it the J6 peak watch thread? I will support your efforts as you know I can.