UN wants new global currency to replace dollar

Anyone thats in favor of a world currency and is an American citizen? If so I have some snake oil for sale.. only costs half your net worth but believe me its for the good of you and your children.
 
Chapdog said:
Anyone thats in favor of a world currency and is an American citizen? If so I have some snake oil for sale.. only costs half your net worth but believe me its for the good of you and your children.
Click to expand...

Anyone who thinks the world should remain chained to America does indeed have snake oil to sell.

Too bad nobody is buying that bullshit.

Whether it benefits Americans of their children is totally beside the point.

And for clarity, I never said I favored it, but I surely understand the reality of it.

Do you?
 
blackascoal said:
Dude, stick the "lets see if he answers" bullshit up your ass.

Who in the fuck do you think is afraid of you or anything you have to say?

ALL, as in EVERY nation, conducts monetary policy based on global exchange.

Is this news to you?

Monetary policy dictates that reserve currency is held with confidence in that currency.

Am I going to fast?

How do you propose that nations address monetary policy without bankers?

Who should determine best practices .. plumbers?

While you rail and flail away at bankers, my issue is policy.

My stand against the bailout wasn't a stand against bankers .. they have a function. My stand was against the bad policy of giving away taxpayer money to banks which should stand or fall on their own.
Click to expand...

But you're fine with bankers using monetary policy to grow and collapse the economy as it suites them and their friends? You're stupider than we thought.
 
blackascoal said:
So goes Moron #16.

How's Afghanistan working out for ya'

All about "democracy", eh?

:0)
Click to expand...

No, it is not about democracy you twit. It is about removing the regime that allowed Bin Laden and his band of merry terrorists to operate inside their country.

Bottom line... it most certainly WASN'T about a friggin pipeline like some idiots want the world to believe.
 
AssHatZombie said:
But you're fine with bankers using monetary policy to grow and collapse the economy as it suites them and their friends? You're stupider than we thought.
Click to expand...

And you ask why talking to you is tiresome.

Post where I have ever said anything remotely similar to what you claim.

Dude, all you have is bullshit.

You're not capable of serious conversation.

What in the fuck do you think a plutocracy is?
 
blackascoal said:
Anyone who thinks the world should remain chained to America does indeed have snake oil to sell.

Too bad nobody is buying that bullshit.

Whether it benefits Americans of their children is totally beside the point.

And for clarity, I never said I favored it, but I surely understand the reality of it.

Do you?
Click to expand...

Honestly? I care about my families well being first, then my friends, then my country men, then our alies, then the rest of the world. Why would i want families lifestyle to go down while my lowest care moves up?
 
blackascoal said:
And you ask why talking to you is tiresome.

Post where I have ever said anything remotely similar to what you claim.

Dude, all you have is bullshit.

You're not capable of serious conversation.

What in the fuck do you think a plutocracy is?
Click to expand...

I can't post your lack of cricism, db.

I think a plutocracy is like a hegemon.
 
Superfreak said:
No, it is not about democracy you twit. It is about removing the regime that allowed Bin Laden and his band of merry terrorists to operate inside their country.

Bottom line... it most certainly WASN'T about a friggin pipeline like some idiots want the world to believe.
Click to expand...

We've been "removing" Bin Laden for about twice as long as WWII lasted you nitwit.

Ever heard of Karzai?

What is his history?

How did he, a nobody who didn't even live in Afghanistan come to power .. and more importantly, who brought him to power?

What was ENRON's involvement in Afghanistan politics?

Did ENRON go to the White House six times during the Bush Administration to secretly plan energy policy with Cheney?

Was the Taliban invited to Texas by UNOCOL and ENRON in a major, continuing effort to construct pipelines through Afghanistan from the petroleum-rich Caspian Basin in Central Asia?

Did a UNOCOL executive get appointed as US Envoy to Afghanistan?

Have plans for this pipeline you claim is a figment of my imagination been ijn existence since the Russinas were kicked out?

Don't feel any pressure to answer any of these questions because I already know that you're stupid.
 
Chapdog said:
Honestly? I care about my families well being first, then my friends, then my country men, then our alies, then the rest of the world. Why would i want families lifestyle to go down while my lowest care moves up?
Click to expand...

Here's the point .. it's not about you .. or me.

The world is looking to change the reserve currency because there is no confidence in American monetary policy, no confidence in American leadership.

Can you blame them?
 
blackascoal said:
"We've been "removing" Bin Laden for about twice as long as WWII lasted you nitwit."

The fact that Bush neglected what needed to be done, does not change the reason we went into Afghanistan you dolt.

"Ever heard of Karzai?"

Yes

"What is his history?"

Not relevant to why we went into Afghanistan.

"How did he, a nobody who didn't even live in Afghanistan come to power .. and more importantly, who brought him to power?"

A nobody? LMAO... do some research BAC... he was hardly a nobody. He was appointed UN representative by the Taliban, when he refused to take the position he was exiled. He was appointed interim President until the Afghans held election in 2004 and ELECTED him to be their President. You know... the thing you say gives Chavez all sorts of credibility.

"What was ENRON's involvement in Afghanistan politics?"

Do tell... because as far as I can tell, they tried to do business in Afghanistan. Just like many other corps.... they played the country's political games to do so.

"Did ENRON go to the White House six times during the Bush Administration to secretly plan energy policy with Cheney?"

Completely irrelevant.

"Was the Taliban invited to Texas by UNOCOL and ENRON in a major, continuing effort to construct pipelines through Afghanistan from the petroleum-rich Caspian Basin in Central Asia?"

No you ignorant twit. This is where you go wrong time and time again. The pipeline was NOT to take the Caspian oil. The pipeline they were going to build was to take the NAT GAS from southeastern Turkmenistan to Pakistan. Your complete ignorance on this point is what causes your conspiracy to fail. It is NOT about oil. Building the pipeline would only have minimal financial benefits to a US company to build it. The benefit to the US would be in having Turkmenistan producing Nat Gas with a distribution system that would not rely upon Russia.

"Did a UNOCOL executive get appointed as US Envoy to Afghanistan?"

Yes, he was a Unocol exec.... One who happened to be born where? Where was he from BAC? I mean... how DARE they appoint someone familiar with the country. The shock!

"Have plans for this pipeline you claim is a figment of my imagination been ijn existence since the Russinas were kicked out?"

No. Because once again your dumbass conspiracy theory makes you believe it is about the Caspian oil. It is not.

Don't feel any pressure to answer any of these questions because I already know that you're stupid.
Click to expand...

Your last response shows your ignorance, we have debunked your idiocy time and again, yet you still cling to the 'they wanna build an oil pipeline' or 'big oil is behind the war' type bullshit.

You are too ignorant to comprehend when you have been completely debunked.

Side note BAC... no US company has expressed interest in this project since 1998... even after the Taliban fell.
 
Last edited:
blackascoal said:
Here's the point .. it's not about you .. or me.

The world is looking to change the reserve currency because there is no confidence in American monetary policy, no confidence in American leadership.

Can you blame them?
Click to expand...

Right. it's about the central bankers and their personal preferences.

We all should know that.
 
Superfreak said:
Your last response shows your ignorance, we have debunked your idiocy time and again, yet you still cling to the 'they wanna build an oil pipeline' or 'big oil is behind the war' type bullshit.

You are too ignorant to comprehend when you have been completely debunked.

Side note BAC... no US company has expressed interest in this project since 1998... even after the Taliban fell.
Click to expand...

:0)

Sometimes I enjoy talking to really dumb people.

I misspoke .. didn't mean envoy .. meant the executive .. vice-president .. I spoke of is John J. Maresca .. appointed as Ambassador to Afghanistan. Was he an Afghan too?

-December 1997: Unocal Establishes Pipeline Training Facility Near bin Laden’s Compound Unocal pays University of Nebraska $900,000 to set up a training facility near bin Laden’s Kandahar compound, to train 400 Afghan teachers, electricians, carpenters and pipe fitters in anticipation of using them for their pipeline in Afghanistan. One hundred and fifty students are already attending classes.

December 4, 1997: Taliban Representatives Visit Unocal in Texas Taliban representatives in Texas, 1997.

-Representatives of the Taliban are invited guests to the Texas headquarters of Unocal to negotiate their support for the pipeline. Future President George W. Bush is Governor of Texas at the time. The Taliban appear to agree to a $2 billion pipeline deal, but will do the deal only if the US officially recognizes the Taliban regime. The Taliban meet with US officials. According to the Daily Telegraph, “the US government, which in the past has branded the Taliban’s policies against women and children ‘despicable,’ appears anxious to please the fundamentalists to clinch the lucrative pipeline contract.” A BBC regional correspondent says that “the proposal to build a pipeline across Afghanistan is part of an international scramble to profit from developing the rich energy resources of the Caspian Sea.”

-Early 1998: US Official Meets with Taliban; Promote Afghan Pipeline Bill Richardson, the US Ambassador to the UN, meets Taliban officials in Kabul. (All such meetings are illegal, because the US still officially recognizes the government the Taliban ousted as the legitimate rulers of Afghanistan.) US officials at the time call the oil and gas pipeline project a “fabulous opportunity” and are especially motivated by the “prospect of circumventing Iran, which offers another route for the pipeline.”

-February 12, 1998: Unocal VP Advocates Afghan Pipeline Before Congress Unocal Vice President John J. Maresca—later to become a Special Ambassador to Afghanistan—testifies before the House of Representatives that until a single, unified, friendly government is in place in Afghanistan, the trans-Afghan pipeline will not be built. He suggests that with a pipeline through Afghanistan, the Caspian basin could produce 20 percent of all the non-OPEC oil in the world by 2010.

I made all this up, right? Then debunk it.

The US does not engage in wars for oil, right?

Oil and pipelines have no place ijn US foreign policy, right?

... dummy

UNOCOL executives and a consultant are appointed as Ambassador AND Envoy AND President.

Just business as usual, right?

.. dummy
 
Last edited:
Chapdog said:
Honestly? I care about my families well being first, then my friends, then my country men, then our alies, then the rest of the world. Why would i want families lifestyle to go down while my lowest care moves up?
Click to expand...

It is the inevitable result of globalization and free trade.
 
Another iinevitable result is as we fall downward and others grow our money system as the global standard will be replaced by a more dominant money system.

I am not saying I am for or against any of this for the purpost of this thread. Just that it is the inevitable outcome.
 
uscitizen said:
Another iinevitable result is as we fall downward and others grow our money system as the global standard will be replaced by a more dominant money system.

I am not saying I am for or against any of this for the purpost of this thread. Just that it is the inevitable outcome.
Click to expand...

The cool thing about reality is things can reverse path, and nothing is really inevitable.
 
uscitizen said:
Another iinevitable result is as we fall downward and others grow our money system as the global standard will be replaced by a more dominant money system.

I am not saying I am for or against any of this for the purpost of this thread. Just that it is the inevitable outcome.
Click to expand...

Inevitable outcomes from ignorant policies are something most here can't deal with.

They'd rather joust about like idiots then face reality.

Why should the world remain hostage to a failed American economy and leadership?

Anyone have that answer?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top