Woman with Pistol Stops Man Firing at Graduation Party Crowd with AR-15

archives said:
Yeah, the 19 fully trained armed police unit, the epitome of “good guys with guns,” men trained to act, stood in the hall while kids were being slaughter, and the shooter doing the massacring was a “good guy with a gun” right up until the second he pulled the trigger

Forget the “good guy with a gun” bullshit, it ain’t real
Click to expand...


both had AR15...CHECK

the differance

only one had a good guy with gun that could fire back at just the sight of the AR15 being pointed and was able to stop the shooter within seconds..result no one dead but the bad guy

the other had to wait and wait and wait and wait and wait and wait and wait and wait and wait on police to do something


A CCW with a pistol stopped a bad guy with a long criminal record with an AR15 from committing a mass shooting...and that just pisses u off

FACT
 
Last edited:
ExpressLane said:
Always have been and always be smarter than you. That is the reason you don't understand logical questions, dummy.
Click to expand...

Hurr durr derp r u implying the women isn't a person? Jesus Christ. :palm:

If you would stop being a retard and think. I was clearly referring to the cops who did nothing.
 
Mina said:
Who? Could you cite the post? Or is this a strawman you've created for the sake of an argument?
Click to expand...

There's a whole thread where someone on this very site said it about Uvalde. This isn't a strawman, you are just trying to gaslight your way out of what your side of the argument stated.
 
Damocles said:
There's a whole thread where someone on this very site said it about Uvalde. This isn't a strawman, you are just trying to gaslight your way out of what your side of the argument stated.
Click to expand...

They are supposed to be the good guys. That's the point.
 
This is a perfect example of how that weirdo in Texas could’ve been stopped by a teacher with a pistol. It’s criminal how the Left has put our kids in danger.
 
Damocles said:
There's a whole thread where someone on this very site said it about Uvalde. This isn't a strawman, you are just trying to gaslight your way out of what your side of the argument stated.
Click to expand...

Do you have a link? I've seen people pointing out, correctly, that such things are exceedingly rare (and that therefore having a bunch of people walking round with guns all the time in hopes of having one there at such a moment could mean a net increase of deaths, after counting things like increased accidental shootings). I haven't seen anyone suggest that somehow it would be impossible for a good person with a gun to shoot someone.

Also, obviously "gaslight" isn't the correct word to describe someone asking for evidence to support an assertion you've made.
 
Good thing it was not a government created gun free zone. The only guy with a gun would have been the bad guy
 
Mina said:
Do you have a link? I've seen people pointing out, correctly, that such things are exceedingly rare (and that therefore having a bunch of people walking round with guns all the time in hopes of having one there at such a moment could mean a net increase of deaths, after counting things like increased accidental shootings). I haven't seen anyone suggest that somehow it would be impossible for a good person with a gun to shoot someone.

Also, obviously "gaslight" isn't the correct word to describe someone asking for evidence to support an assertion you've made.
Click to expand...

It is, however, clearly the correct word to describe someone ignoring what folks say on this board and pretending to ask for "evidence" for something they've personally seen on the site while pretending that they didn't. In fact, that is exactly the right word for it.
 
Damocles said:
It is, however, clearly the correct word to describe someone ignoring what folks say on this board and pretending to ask for "evidence" for something they've personally seen on the site while pretending that they didn't. In fact, that is exactly the right word for it.
Click to expand...

I haven't seen it. I take it from your failure to post a link that you haven't either. Wouldn't it be better, in the future, to just admit you were using a straw man attack, rather than trying to pretend otherwise?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top