Russia's army could collapse amid huge losses of more than 30,000 troops

Yes, but not with us. You...being a warmonger, want to get involved though and that's why you are the LAST person whose opinion should matter here.
they are dime a dozen -they pop up like weeds in summer. They cant be stopped
 
It just means that you're retarded.

Retarded in what way ?

Incidentally- why do you think that an army that invades another country to ethnically-cleanse and murder its population should be called a ' defense ' force ?

Tell me about that retardation again....................




Haw, haw................................haw.
 
So, if it manages to survive for another five centuries, then, it gets to stay a country. That has basically been the Muslim argument for maintaining its occupation of the Holy Land.

Also, I like being able to ship weapons into Ukraine to be used against Russian troops. Much harder to do that if it gets annexed.


3D, you detest Germany, so here is some more grist to your mill.

The nasty truth about Lenin: Antony Beevor doesn't fully explore the tale behind the USSR's birth, but he still produces a well-researched volume

In the late summer of 1914 a small, nasty man was arrested as an enemy alien in a remote corner of the Austrian empire. The man was Vladimir Lenin

Yet the Austrian and German empires thought they could use him. They appreciated his efforts to promote Ukrainian nationalism.

Then, these ultra-conservative monarchists sprang him from prison and conveyed him to safety in neutral Switzerland.

Later, they arranged for him and his clique of Bolshevik agitators (whom they would normally have arrested on sight) to return to Russia across Germany. And there they supplied his movement with nine tons of gold to help him ruin Russia.

Thanks to them he was able to overthrow Russia’s first liberal democracy in a ruthless putsch, which was the beginning of 70 years of police-state terror.

In return for these favours, Lenin pulled Russia out of the First World War, so allowing Germany to send huge numbers of troops to the Western Front. There they came within an inch of breaking through to the Channel and defeating Britain and France.

He also handed Germany vast slices of Russian territory, not least Ukraine, important then, as now, as a pivot of power.

All this is known, including the role in it of the most sinister and cynical secret agent ever known, the weirdly named Parvus Helphand. Yet you will barely find a word of this in Antony Beevor’s new book about the Russian Revolution.

Mr Beevor is a fine historian – diligent, conscientious and knowledgeable, with a long list of excellent books behind him. This volume is well researched and full of telling detail. I have read every word of it.

But, like so many before him, he has not felt quite able to acknowledge the role of Germany and its Austrian ally in the deliberate crushing of Russian freedom and the creation of the Soviet prison state.

For many decades, widespread Left-wing admiration for the Soviet Union made it hard to tell the squalid truth, that Lenin was a German agent and the much-romanticised ‘revolution’ a miserable foreign-inspired coup d’etat.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/ev...ution-Civil-War-review-nasty-truth-Lenin.html
 
Last edited:
Yes, but not with us. You...being a warmonger, want to get involved though and that's why you are the LAST person whose opinion should matter here.

Do you think it's appropriate to lend aid to allies when they go to war? How is it warmongering to literally not go to war?
 
But, like so many before him, he has not felt quite able to acknowledge the role of Germany and its Austrian ally in the deliberate crushing of Russian freedom and the creation of the Soviet prison state.
what is it with the west and Russia??
Russian culture is unique but still more tied by religion and
orientation to the west...
 
im getting there. but then again im not pleased with NATO in many ways
I consider it a necessary evil now.

I got it. You're that "anatta". That member I didn't recognize when I got here. The last time she's been seen was 10 days ago. So you're anatta.
 
Manservant
th
So you're anatta.



No- but you're definitely a nutter.



Haw, haw......................................haw.
 
I got it. You're that "anatta". That member I didn't recognize when I got here. The last time she's been seen was 10 days ago. So you're anatta.
yes i dont make any secret about it, but "anatta" isnt a feminine name it's a Buddhist term = no self
 
.
While Moscow's latest estimated troop losses make grim reading for President Vladimir Putin, the report claims he sees them as a 'price worth paying' for victory.

However, the new report - a secretive analysis of Putin's brutal invasion seen by The Mirror - claims that the losses could be too great for his soldiers, amid other reports that Russian morale is low.

Latest estimates from the Ukraine's Armed Forces suggest as many as 30,350 Russian soldiers have been killed since the invasion was launched on February 24, which came after more than 100,000 of the Kremlin's troops massed on the border.

In addition, several thousand Russian military vehicles - including tanks, aircraft and mobile artillery units - have been destroyed in Putin's so-called 'special military operation' that has dragged into its fourth month.

In the latest example of heavy Russian losses, it was reported on Monday that a Ukrainian paratrooper regiment destroyed a Russian regiment.

Former Ukrainian journalist and editor, and a Ukraine Army veteran, Viktor Kovalenko claimed: 'The Ukrainian 80th Paratrooper-Storm Brigade confirms that they annihilated a unit of the Russian 104 Paratrooper-Storm Regiment (76th Division).'

He said around 20 Ukrainian servicemen were killed and their armour destroyed in the attack. The location of the assault was not reported.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/ar...0-000-troops-confidential-UK-report-says.html

Other subject peoples in Russia would be smart to coordinate a rebellion right now. Russia is effectively an empire, where a majority of ethnic Russians keep millions of local populations of ethnic minorities under their heel with the threat of military force. No one ethnic enclave has a chance against that. But with Putin's inept blundering having wiped out a lot of Russia's military power in mere months, and with what remains mostly tied up and bleeding out in Ukraine, it's a rare opportunity. If several of those ethnic enclaves could make common cause and simultaneously declare independence, others would soon follow suit and Russia would see its empire tear apart at the seams. It's not so different from when the Soviet bloc nations took a moment of Soviet weakness to tear away in the early 1990's.
 
Other subject peoples in Russia would be smart to coordinate a rebellion right now. Russia is effectively an empire, where a majority of ethnic Russians keep millions of local populations of ethnic minorities under their heel with the threat of military force. No one ethnic enclave has a chance against that.

Sounds like the American domestic empire- a majority of immigrant Americans sitting on the ethnic populations and other minorities under the threat of military force.

If several of those ethnic enclaves could make common cause and simultaneously declare independence, others would soon follow suit and (America ) would see its empire tear apart at the seams.

California might lead the way ? There's a Latino majority on the near horizon. There might be some change in store after that.
 
Sounds like the American domestic empire- a majority of immigrant Americans sitting on the ethnic populations and other minorities under the threat of military force.

I don't think so. For starters, we have a pluralistic multi-party democracy. If people don't like the leaders, we have a chance to vote them out... whereas Putin has been in de facto control of Russia for two decades. We also have open media and regardless of who is in power at the moment we have state and local governments in the hands of the opposition party. Again, that's different from Russia where you risk prison by speaking out against the leader (or even just protesting his war), and where opposition politicians wind up murdered or imprisoned.

Because of that, if, in the US, an ethnic minority group that formed a substantial majority in a significant locality wanted to break away, there'd be a way to campaign for that. And such campaigns do, in fact, exist, right out in the open, without fear. They just never get much momentum, because most people are happy to stay with the US. That's very different from Russia, where military force keeps people in line.

There's a Latino majority on the near horizon. There might be some change in store after that.

I doubt it. The only way I could see California breaking away would be as part of a much larger multi-ethnic block of states -- including NV, OR, and WA, at least, and probably also the whole of the Northeast. Going it alone would be problematic for any state, and sticking around in the rump US would be problematic for any liberal state that didn't leave.
 
Back
Top