Trial Docs: Sussmann Edited FBI Press Release About DNC Hack Because It ‘Undermined’

Mina said:
No. Can you point out even a single normal person who calls it that? Heck, can you even point out a single SANE person who calls it that?

Obviously, giving a person a chance to comment on a press release that concerns them before it goes out isn't giving approval power. It's just a way to make sure you're not missing anything important. It's the same reason, for example, that reporters contact the subject of a story for comment before they go out with it. They want the subject to have a chance to call their attention to anything they may have gotten wrong, or any important context that may be missing. If you go to press with something without that kind of review, it's a lot more likely you'll make an embarrassing error.
Click to expand...

they changed substantially meaningful language.

You must live in a dimension where extreme stupidity is the norm.

how sad for you.
 
Mina said:
No. Can you point out even a single normal person who calls it that? Heck, can you even point out a single SANE person who calls it that?

Obviously, giving a person a chance to comment on a press release that concerns them before it goes out isn't giving approval power. It's just a way to make sure you're not missing anything important. It's the same reason, for example, that reporters contact the subject of a story for comment before they go out with it. They want the subject to have a chance to call their attention to anything they may have gotten wrong, or any important context that may be missing. If you go to press with something without that kind of review, it's a lot more likely you'll make an embarrassing error.
Click to expand...

they changed substantially meaningful language.

You must live in a dimension where extreme stupidity is the norm.

how sad for you.
 
AssHatZombie said:
they changed substantially meaningful language.
Click to expand...

Yes -- they took out misleading language and replaced it with something that better reflected the reality of the situation. I bet they're glad they didn't embarrass themselves by going out with that erroneous first draft!
 
AssHatZombie said:
this wasn't about that, you retarded, ape-faced, goon.
Click to expand...
LOL.
What do you think it is about?

I'll bet you haven't read the actual emails or the actual press release.

By the way, it seems that this proves that Durham and his team lied to the court when he claimed the FBI didn't know that Sussmann worked for the Democrats.
How could the FBI know that Sussmann works for the Democrats in July and then not know it in September?
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
LOL.
What do you think it is about?

I'll bet you haven't read the actual emails or the actual press release.

By the way, it seems that this proves that Durham and his team lied to the court when he claimed the FBI didn't know that Sussmann worked for the Democrats.
How could the FBI know that Sussmann works for the Democrats in July and then not know it in September?
Click to expand...

you think this email exchange was about permission to identify the victim? yer dum.

they knew the whole time, they're part of the deep state conspiracy to elect clinton by any means necessary.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top