A modest proposal for Left wingers.....

AProudLefty said:
See the pattern?

mass-shootings-ar-15.jpg
Click to expand...

So you believe it is ok to die by pistol? WEIRD. Shall we look up how many people are shot by Pistols and other guns per year in comparison to AR-15's ? You do know it is a lot more right. Like...A LOT more. Why do you not care? I thought the goal was about saving Human life. I guess in the end thats all bullshit. How sad.
 
Stone said:
So you believe it is ok to die by pistol? WEIRD. Shall we look up how many people are shot by Pistols and other guns per year in comparison to AR-15's ? You do know it is a lot more right. Like...A LOT more. Why do you not care? I thought the goal was about saving Human life. I guess in the end thats all bullshit. How sad.
Click to expand...

Do you think Stephen Paddock would be able to shoot many people with a handgun from a distance?
 
Stone said:
Sooooooo,.....would you not all agree that in any bad situation it is normal and correct to fix the worst of it FIRST,....then proceed on to the rest? I mean,....if you have a leaky boat surely you would patch the hole where most of the water is coming in first and then proceed on to the tiny pinhole right? Yes,....of course I am right.

Sooooooooooo,...here is where I am going with this. Lets pretend that some day you do in fact get your long sought after wish of taking our guns away,....going door to door,.....taking them as you go. Wouldnt it make MUCH MORE sense to grab up all the guns from the absolute worst crime areas in the nation first and then work your way backward. This way we save more lives,...MANY MORE LIVES.

Wouldnt be hard to figure out where to go either. Simply pull up the FBI's stats on Gun violence and where it is happening most and have at it. Remember,....the goal is to save as many lives as possible. In this way my idea is really the ONLY way to achieve that.

Agreed?

You will be starting in the Cabrini-Green area of Chicago. Should be an interesting time for you with excitement a plenty. ;) If my math skills are correct I would think you would be getting around to my area,...ohhhhhhhhhhh,.....sometime in around 2078, 2079 or so.

Remember,....the goal is to SAVE LIVES. Logic would dictate that you would want to go the the areas losing the most life first. Any other way would not be logical and if it is not logical you dont have a chance in hell of passing legislation. Good luck........:cool:
Click to expand...

Not interested in taking away all guns, or going door to door to confiscate them. Thats your words, not any mainstream liberal.

I have a 16 gage in my closet, it was my grandfathers hunting rifle. I shoot it sometimes at the range or in North Carolina at skeet. Its lots of fun.
 
Stone said:
Sooooooo,.....would you not all agree that in any bad situation it is normal and correct to fix the worst of it FIRST,....then proceed on to the rest? I mean,....if you have a leaky boat surely you would patch the hole where most of the water is coming in first and then proceed on to the tiny pinhole right? Yes,....of course I am right.

Sooooooooooo,...here is where I am going with this. Lets pretend that some day you do in fact get your long sought after wish of taking our guns away,....going door to door,.....taking them as you go. Wouldnt it make MUCH MORE sense to grab up all the guns from the absolute worst crime areas in the nation first and then work your way backward. This way we save more lives,...MANY MORE LIVES.

Wouldnt be hard to figure out where to go either. Simply pull up the FBI's stats on Gun violence and where it is happening most and have at it. Remember,....the goal is to save as many lives as possible. In this way my idea is really the ONLY way to achieve that.

Agreed?

You will be starting in the Cabrini-Green area of Chicago. Should be an interesting time for you with excitement a plenty. ;) If my math skills are correct I would think you would be getting around to my area,...ohhhhhhhhhhh,.....sometime in around 2078, 2079 or so.

Remember,....the goal is to SAVE LIVES. Logic would dictate that you would want to go the the areas losing the most life first. Any other way would not be logical and if it is not logical you dont have a chance in hell of passing legislation. Good luck........:cool:
Click to expand...

You're simply wallowing in examples of the chaos that guns have created, dumbass.

The solution is to get rid of dumbasses.
 
Jarod said:
Not interested in taking away all guns, or going door to door to confiscate them. Thats your words, not any mainstream liberal.

I have a 16 gage in my closet, it was my grandfathers hunting rifle. I shoot it sometimes at the range or in North Carolina at skeet. Its lots of fun.
Click to expand...

Oh,...I see. So you are interested in taking away the guns that kill the LEAST amount of people and save the LEAST amount of lives. Got it, ;)
 
Jarod said:
Not interested in taking away all guns, or going door to door to confiscate them. Thats your words, not any mainstream liberal.

I have a 16 gage in my closet, it was my grandfathers hunting rifle. I shoot it sometimes at the range or in North Carolina at skeet. Its lots of fun.
Click to expand...

You shoot a rifle at skeet? Um... I've never seen anyone ever shoot a rifle at skeet. Skeet shooting is done with shotguns. Shotguns are not hunting rifles. So, your grandfather's hunting shotgun is what you are saying you are using to shoot at skeet. There is no such thing as a 16 gauge rifle.
 
Damocles said:
You shoot a rifle at skeet? Um... I've never seen anyone ever shoot a rifle at skeet. Skeet shooting is done with shotguns. Shotguns are not hunting rifles. So, your grandfather's hunting shotgun is what you are saying you are using to shoot at skeet. There is no such thing as a 16 gauge rifle.
Click to expand...

I do not know much about what you call different guns, but the guy who cleaned it for me and restored it called it a 16 gage and I call it a shotgun, called it the wrong thing above. I do shoot it at both skeet and clay pigeons, for fun in an unorganized way.

I made a mistake when I called it a rifle.

I admit I sometimes make mistakes.
 
Jarod said:
I do not know much about what you call different guns, but the guy who cleaned it for me and restored it called it a 16 gage and I call it a shotgun, called it the wrong thing above. I do shoot it at both skeet and clay pigeons, for fun in an unorganized way.

I made a mistake when I called it a rifle.

I admit I sometimes make mistakes.
Click to expand...

Cool. I wasn't playing gotcha here. I was just noting that it was not a rifle. Hopefully in a semi-humorous way. I don't know how folks read that in their head. I wasn't trying to be meanly sarcastic, it was supposed to be lighthearted sarcasm.
 
Damocles said:
Cool. I wasn't playing gotcha here. I was just noting that it was not a rifle. Hopefully in a semi-humorous way. I don't know how folks read that in their head. I wasn't trying to be meanly sarcastic, it was supposed to be lighthearted sarcasm.
Click to expand...

I took no offence, enjoyed the chance to admit I was wrong.
 
Stone said:
A shotgun is NOT a rifle. Hunting or otherwise.
Click to expand...

I know what a shotgun is, and I know they are used to hunt.

Jarod didn't claim to be an expert, and your attempts to word-smith him into surrender just don't cut the mustard
 
Cypress said:
I know what a shotgun is, and I know they are used to hunt.

Jarod didn't claim to be an expert, and your attempts to word-smith him into surrender just don't cut the mustard
Click to expand...

Actually I wasnt. If you look back I thanked him when he said he didnt know much about guns. I was basically joking,....thus the reason for the thanks I gave his post.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top